The Coach as a Container in the Team Coaching Process

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to illustrate the essential nature of the role of the team coach in holding and containing an interactional learning space for teams in transformation, such that in-depth and sustainable change can take place. In organizations, the container mechanism is held by different groups – sometimes a management group – and in a learning space it could be held by the coach, consultant, or facilitator. The structure of the methodology is in itself a container. A container refers to a capacity or structure which can hold anxieties and uncomfortable feelings while they are considered or processed, or while other essential work is done. The containing role the coach takes up is a conscious one and has direct implications for the ability of teams to change in ways that improve performance. This research explores the role of coach, as container, using projective identification as a key communications process, from the perspective of an eclectic depth-psychology approach. Using three case studies from various different cultural contexts, this containing process is highlighted and analysed from a systems psychodynamic approach and a somatic systemic theoretical perspective. Psychological strategies, approaches, techniques and coaching practice guidelines are described in their application in these teams and their complex organizational settings. Patterns and themes across these wider systems are identified. Issues of safety, splitting, belonging and conscience, and power and authority were identified. The construct of projective identification is illustrated as one of the primary containing mechanisms used.

Keywords

Somatic systemic approach Constellations Container mechanism Systems psychodynamics Object relations theory Good enough coach Complexity Systems transformation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements are due to our clients who worked with us and were open to significant change, as well as my business partners and fellow coaches.

References

  1. Cilliers, F. (2005). Executive coaching experiences: A systems psychodynamic perspective. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31(3), 23–30. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v31i3.205.Google Scholar
  2. Cilliers, F., & Koortzen, P. (1997). Introduction to group behaviour and processes. Pretoria: Centre for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.Google Scholar
  3. Cilliers, F., & Koortzen, P. (2002). The psychoanalytic approach to team development. In R. L. Lowman (Ed.), Handbook of organizational consulting psychology (pp. 260–284). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Cilliers, F., & Terblanche, L. (2010). The systems psychodynamic leadership coaching experiences of nursing managers. Health SA Gesondheid, 15(1), Art #457, 9 pages. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v15i1.457.
  5. Clarke, S., & Hoggett, P. (2009). Researching beneath the surface. Psycho-social research methods in practice. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, A., & Dartington, T. (2004). The vanishing organization: Organizational containment in a networked world. In C. Huffington, A. Armstrong, W. Halton, L. Hoyle, & J. Pooley (Eds.), Working below the surface. The emotional life of contemporary organizations (pp. 127–150). London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  7. Dimitrov, P. L. (2008). Organizational psychodynamics. Unpublished lectures.Google Scholar
  8. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Halton, W. (1994). Some unconscious aspects of organizational life: Contributions from psychoanalysis. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 11–18). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: Supervision and development. England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hellinger, B. (1998). Love’s hidden symmetry. Arizona: Zeig, Tucker and Co.Google Scholar
  12. Hellinger, B. (2006). No waves without the ocean: Experiences and thoughts. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.Google Scholar
  13. Horn, K. P., & Brick, R. (2005). Invisible dynamics. Systems constellations in organizationss and business. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.Google Scholar
  14. Jaques, E. (1953). On the dynamics of social structure: A contribution to the psycho-analytical study of social phenomena. Human Relations, 6(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1177/001872675300600101February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, R., & Waterfield, J. (2004). Making words count: The value of qualitative research. Physiotherapy Research International, 9(3), 121–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Konigswieser, R., & Hillebrand, M. (2005). Systemic consultancy in organizationss: Concepts – tools – innovations. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.Google Scholar
  17. Lawton-Smith, C. (2011). Organizational psychology models in coaching supervision. In T. Bachkirova, P. Jackson, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), Coaching & mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (pp. 155–166). England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, G. (2010). The psychodynamic approach to coaching. In E. Cox, T. Bachkirova, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The complete handbook of coaching (pp. 23–36). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Moylan, D. (1994). The dangers of contagion: Projective identification processes in institutions. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 51–59). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Newman, J. L., Robinson-Kurpius, S. E., & Faqua, D. R. (2002). Issues in the ethical practice of consulting psychology. In R. L. Lowman (Ed.), Handbook of organizational consulting psychology (pp. 733–758). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Obholzer, A. (1994). Authority, power and leadership: Contributions from group relations training. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 39–50). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rioch, M. J. (1975). The work of Wilfred Bion on groups. In A. D. Colman & W. H. Bexton (Eds.), Group relations reader 1 (pp. 21–33). Jupiter: The A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, V. Z. (1994a). The organization of work: Contributions from open systems theory. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 28–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, V. Z. (1994b). Till death us do part: Caring and uncaring in work with the elderly. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 75–83). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, V. Z. (1994c). The self-assigned impossible task. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 110–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Roberts, V. Z. (1994d). Conflict and collaboration: Managing intergroup relations. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 187–196). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, V. Z., & Brunning, H. (2008). Psychodynamic and systems-psychodynamic coaching. In S. Palmer & A. Whybrow (Eds.), Handbook of coaching psychology: A guide for practitioners (pp. 253–277). Sussex: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ruppert, F. (2008). Trauma, bonding and family constellations: Understanding and healing the injuries of the soul. Frome: Green Balloon Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Schneider, J. R. (2007). Family constellations: Basic principles and procedures. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.Google Scholar
  30. Speck, P. (1994). Working with dying people on being good enough. In A. Obholzer & V. R. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 94–100). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Stapley, L. F. (2006). Individuals, groups, and organizations beneath the surface. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  32. Stokes, J. (1994). The unconscious at work in groups and team: Contributions from the work of Wilfred Bion. In A. Obholzer & V. R. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 19–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Tomaschek, N., & Strobel, M. (2010). Conscious organization. The Augusburg school on innovation coaching for higher performance, agility and innovation in business. In S. Schloemer & N. Tomaschek (Eds.), Leading in complexity: New ways in management (pp. 118–130). Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.Google Scholar
  34. Ulsamer, B. (2003). The art and practice of family constellations. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.Google Scholar
  35. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). General system theory – A critical review. In J. Beishon & G. Peters (Eds.), Systems behaviour (pp. 29–49). London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Psychologist, Team and Systems Coach, Systems ConsultantJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations