Towards Adaptive Evolutionary Architecture

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9596)

Abstract

This paper presents first results from an interdisciplinary project, in which the fields of architecture, philosophy and artificial life are combined to explore possible futures of architecture. Through an interactive evolutionary installation, called EvoCurtain, we investigate aspects of how living in the future could occur, if built spaces could evolve and adapt alongside inhabitants. As such, present study explores the interdisciplinary possibilities in utilizing computational power to co-create with users and generate designs based on human input. We argue that this could lead to the development of designs tailored to the individual preferences of inhabitants, changing the roles of architects and designers entirely. Architecture-as-it-could-be is a philosophical approach conducted through artistic methods to anticipate the technological futures of human-centered development within architect.

Keywords

Evolutionary computation Interactive evolution Architecture Artificial life 

References

  1. 1.
    Bedau, M.A., McCaskill, J.S., Packard, N.H., Rasmussen, S., Adami, C., Green, D.G., Ikegami, T., Kaneko, K., Ray, T.S.: Open problems in artificial life. Artif. Life 6(4), 363–376 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langton, C.G.: Artificial Life: An Overview. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takagi, H.: Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proc. IEEE 89(9), 1275–1296 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalay, Y.E.: Architecture’s New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer-Aided Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiberg, M.: Interactive Textures for Architecture and Landscaping: Digital Elements and Technologies: Digital Elements and Technologies. IGI Global, Hershey (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schumacher, P.: Parametricism: a new global style for architecture and urban design. Archit. Des. 79(4), 14–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galanter, P.: The problem with evolutionary art is. In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) EvoApplications 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6025, pp. 321–330. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schnädelbach, H.: Adaptive architecture-a conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of Media City (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schnädelbach, H., Glover, K., Irune, A.A.: Exobuilding: breathing life into architecture. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, pp. 442–451. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farahi Bouzanjani, B., Leach, N., Huang, A., Fox, M.: Alloplastic architecture: The design of an interactive tensegrity structure. In: Adaptive Architecture, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA). ACADIA, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada, pp. 129–136, October 2013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross, P., Tomico, O.: The growth plan: An approach for considering social implications in ambient intelligent system design. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2009 Convention, pp. 6–9. Citeseer (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magielse, R., Ross, P., Rao, S., Ozcelebi, T., Jaramillo, P., Amft, O.: An interdisciplinary approach to designing adaptive lighting environments. In: 2011 7th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), pp. 17–24. IEEE(2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petersen, K.Y., Søndergaard, K.: Staging multi-modal explorative research using formalised techniques of performing arts. In: KSIG 2011: SkinDeep - Experiential Knowledge and Multi Sensory Communication (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merleau-Ponty, M., Smith, C.: Phenomenology of Perception. Motilal Banarsidass Publisherm, Delhi (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Froese, T., Gallagher, S.: Phenomenology and artificial life: toward a technological supplementation of phenomenological methodology. Husserl Stud. 26(2), 83–106 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoover, A.K., Szerlip, P.A., Stanley, K.O.: Functional scaffolding for composing additional musical voices. Comput. Music J. 38(4), 80–99 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dahlstedt, P.: Creating and exploring huge parameter spaces: interactive evolution as a tool for sound generation. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International Computer Music Conference, pp. 235–242 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson, C.G.: Exploring sound-space with interactive genetic algorithms. Leonardo 36(1), 51–54 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jónsson, B.T., Hoover, A.K., Risi, S.: Interactively evolving compositional sound synthesis networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2015, pp. 321–328. ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Secretan, J., Beato, N., D’Ambrosio, D.B., Rodriguez, A., Campbell, A., Folsom-Kovarik, J.T., Stanley, K.O.: Picbreeder: a case study in collaborative evolutionary exploration of design space. Evol. Comput. 19(3), 373–403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Risi, S., Lehman, J., D’Ambrosio, D.B., Hall, R., Stanley, K.O.: Combining search-based procedural content generation and social gaming in the petalz video game. In: Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference (AIIDE 2012), Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hastings, E.J., Guha, R.K., Stanley, K.O.: Evolving content in the galactic arms race video game. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG 2009), pp. 241–248. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoover, A.K., Cachia, W., Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G.N.: Audioinspace: exploring the creative fusion of generative audio, visuals and gameplay. In: Johnson, C., Carballal, A., Correia, J. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2015. LNCS, vol. 9027, pp. 101–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Risi, S., Lehman, J., D’Ambrosio, D., Hall, R., Stanley, K.: Petalz: Search-based procedural content generation for the casual gamer. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games PP(99), 1 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ihde, D.: Bodies in Technology, vol. 5. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keeley, B.L.: Artificial life for philosophers. Philos. Psychol. 11(2), 251–260 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jaskiewicz, T.: Towards a methodology for complex adaptive interactive architecture. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oliver, P.: Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Hølt Bak
    • 1
  • Nina Rask
    • 1
  • Sebastian Risi
    • 1
  1. 1.IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations