Advertisement

Family Traits of Galaxies: From the Tuning Fork to a Physical Classification in a Multi-Wavelength Context

  • Roberto RampazzoEmail author
  • Mauro D’Onofrio
  • Simone Zaggia
  • Debra M. Elmegreen
  • Eija Laurikainen
  • Pierre-Alain Duc
  • Carme Gallart
  • Didier Fraix-Burnet
Chapter
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 435)

Abstract

At the time of the Great Debate nebulæ where recognized to have different morphologies and first classifications, sometimes only descriptive, have been attempted. A review of these early classification systems are well documented by the Allan Sandage’s review in 2005 (Sandage 2005 ). This review emphasized the debt, in term of continuity of forms of spiral galaxies, due by the Hubble’s classification scheme to the Reynold’s systems proposed in 1920 (Reynolds 1920 ).

Keywords

Star Formation Spiral Galaxy Surface Brightness Tuning Fork Stellar Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abraham, R., van den Bergh, S., Nair, P.: A new approach to galaxy morphology. I. Analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early data release. Astrophys. J. 588, 218 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Andrae, R., Jahnke, K., Melchior, P.: Parametrizing arbitrary galaxy morphologies: potentials and pitfalls. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 385 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, J., Romanowsky, Aaron J., Brodie, J.P., Forbes, D.A., Strader, J., et al.: The SLUGGS survey: wide-field stellar kinematics of early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 791, 80 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. Arp, H.: Atlas of peculiar galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 14, 1 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arp, H., Madore, B.: A Catalogue of Southern Peculiar Galaxies and Associations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  6. Athanassoula, E., Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Bosma, A.: On the nature of the barlens component in barred galaxies. astro-ph 1405.6726 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Ball, N.M., Brunner, R.J.: Data mining and machine learning in astronomy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19, 1049 (2010)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Barentine, J., Kormendy, J.: Two pseudobulges in the “boxy bulge” galaxy NGC 5746. Astrophys. J. 754, 140 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bender, R.: Rotating and counter-rotating cores in elliptical galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 193, 7 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertola, F., Capaccioli, M.: Dynamics of early type galaxies. I - The rotation curve of the elliptical galaxy NGC 4697. Astrophys. J. 200, 439 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. Block, D., Freeman, K.: Walk with Allan Sandage. In: Freeman, K., Elmegreen, B., Block, D., Woolway, M.A. (eds.) Lessons from the Local Group, p.1. Springer, Dordrecht (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Block, D., Wainscoatt, R.: Morphological differences between optical and infrared images of the spiral galaxy NGC309. Nature 353, 48 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Block, D., Elmegreen, B., Wainscoat, R.: Smooth dark spiral arms in the flocculent galaxy NGC2841. Nature 381, 674 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Block, D., et al.: The Hubble tuning fork strikes a new note. In: Block, D.L., Puerari, I., Freeman, K.C., Groess, R., Block, E.K. (eds.) Penetrating Bars Through Masks of Cosmic Dust: The Hubble Tuning Fork Strikes a New Note. Proceedings of a Conference Held at Pilanesburg National Park (South Africa). Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 319, p. 15. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bois M., Emsellem, E., Bournaud, F., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - VI. Simulations of binary galaxy mergers and the link with fast rotators, slow rotators and kinematically distinct cores. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1654 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Bournaud, F., Elmegreen, B.G., Elmegreen, D.M.: Astrophys. J. 670, 237 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bournaud, F., Duc, P.-A., Brinks, E., Boquien, M., Amram, P., et al.: Missing mass in collisional debris from galaxies. Science 316, 1166 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brodie J.P., Romanowsky, A.J., Strader, J., Forbes, D.A., Foster, C., et al.: The SAGES legacy unifying globulars and galaxies survey (SLUGGS): sample definition, methods, and initial results. Astrophys. J. 796, 52 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buta, R.: Galaxy morphology. In: Falcon-Barroso, J., Knapen, J. (eds.) Secular Evolution of Galaxies, p.155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  20. Buta, R., Corwin, H.G., Jr., Odewahn, S.C.: In: Athanassoula, E., Bosma, A., Mujica, R. (eds.) The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies. Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Perturbations. ASP Conference Proceedings. vol. 275, p. 102. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco (2002)Google Scholar
  21. Buta, R., Sheth, K., Athanassoula, E., Bosma, A., Knapen, J., et al.: A classical morphological analysis of galaxies in the Spitzer survey of stellar structure in galaxies (S4G). Astrophys. J. Suppl. 217 (2), A32, 46 pp. (2015)Google Scholar
  22. Caon, N., Capaccioli, M., D’Onofrio, M.: On the shape of the light profiles of early type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 265, 1013 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cappellari M., Emsellem, E., Krajnović, D., McDermid, R.M.; Scott, N., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - I. A volume-limited sample of 260 nearby early-type galaxies: science goals and selection criteria Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413, 813 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., Krajnović, D., McDermid, R.M., Serra, P., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - VII. A new look at the morphology of nearby galaxies: the kinematic morphology-density relation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1680 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. Cecil, G., Rose, J.A.: Constraints on galaxy structure and evolution from the light of nearby systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 1177 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Combes, F., Sanders, R.H.: Formation and properties of persisting stellar bars. Astron. Astrophys. 96, 164 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Conselice, C.J.: The relationship between stellar light distributions of galaxies and their formation histories. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 147, 1 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Conselice, C.J.: The fundamental properties of galaxies and a new galaxy classification system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 373, 1389 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cooper A. P., D’Souza, R., Kauffmann, G., Wang, J., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al.: Galactic accretion and the outer structure of galaxies in the CDM model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 3348 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cortesi, A., Merrifield, M.R., Coccato, L., Arnaboldi, M., Gerhard, O., et al.: Planetary nebula spectrograph survey of S0 galaxy kinematics - II. Clues to the origins of S0 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 1010 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. de Vaucouleurs, G.: Classification and morphology of external galaxies. Handbuch der Physik. vol. 53, p. 275. Springer, Berlin (1959)Google Scholar
  32. de Vaucouleurs, G., et al.: Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies, vols. I–III. Springer, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Disney, M.J.: Visibility of galaxies. Nature 263, 573 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dressler, A.: Galaxy morphology in rich clusters - Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 236, 351 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dressler A., Sandage A.: Rotational velocities and central velocity dispersions for a sample of S0 galaxies. Astrophys. J. 265, 664 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dressler A., Oemler, A., Jr., Butcher, H. R., Gunn, J. E.: The morphology of distant cluster galaxies. 1: HST observations of CL 0939+4713. Astrophys. J. 430, 107 (1994)Google Scholar
  37. Duc P.-A., Paudel, S., McDermid, R.M., Cuillandre, J.-C., Serra, P., et al.: Identification of old tidal dwarfs near early-type galaxies from deep imaging and H I observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440, 1458 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Duc, P.-A., Cuillandre, J.-C., Karabal, E., Cappellari, M., Alatalo, K., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - XXIX. The new look of early-type galaxies and surrounding fields disclosed by extremely deep optical images. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 120 (2015).Google Scholar
  39. Elbaz D., Dickinson, M., Hwang, H.S., Dìaz-Santos, T., Magdis, G., et al.: Astron. Astrophys. 533, A119 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eliche-Moral, M., Gonzàlez-García, A.C., Aguerri, J.A.L., Gallego, J., Zamorano, J., et al.: Evolution along the sequence of S0 Hubble types induced by dry minor mergers. I. Global bulge-to-disk structural relations. Astron. Astrophys. 547, 48 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Elmegreen, D.M.: A near-infrared atlas of spiral galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 47, 229 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Elmegreen, D.M., Elmegreen, B.G.: Blue and near-infrared surface photometry of spiral structure in 34 nonbarred grand design and flocculent galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 54, 127 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Elmegreen, D.M., Elmegreen, B.G.: Arm classifications for spiral galaxies. Astrophys. J. 314, 3 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Emsellem, E., Cappellari, M., Krajnovic̀, D., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - III. A census of the stellar angular momentum within the effective radius of early-type galaxies: unveiling the distribution of fast and slow rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 888 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. Eskridge, P.B., Frogel, J.A., Pogge, R.W., Quillen, A.C., Davies, R.L., et al.: The frequency of barred spiral galaxies in the near-infrared. Astron. J. 119, 536 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Falcon-Barroso, J., Lyubenova M., van de Ven G.: Angular momentum across the Hubble sequence from the CALIFA survey. In: Cappellari, M., Courteau, S. (eds.) Galaxy Masses as Constrains of Formation Models, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, IAU Symposium, vol. 311, pp. 78–81 (2015)ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., Piconcelli, E., Menci, N., Aussel, H., et al.: Quasar feedback revealed by giant molecular outflows Astron. Astrophys. 518, L155 (2010)ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. Fraix-Burnet, D., Dugué, M., Chattopadhyay, T., Chattopadhyay, A.K., Davoust E.: Structures in the fundamental plane of early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, 2207 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fraix-Burnet, D., Chattopadhyay, T., Chattopadhyay, A.K., Davoust, E., Thuillard, M.: A six-parameter space to describe galaxy diversification. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A80 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gerola, H., Seiden, P.: Stochastic star formation and spiral structure of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 223, 129 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hodge P.W.: Dwarf galaxies. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 35 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hodge, P.W., Pyper, D.M., Webb, C.J.: Dwarf galaxies in the Fornax cluster. Astron. J. 70, 559 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Holmberg, E.: A photographic photometry of extragalactic nebulae. Lund. Medd. Astron. Obs. Ser. II. vol. 136, p.1 (1958)ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. Hubble, E.: A general study of diffuse galactic nebulæ. Astrophys. J. 56, 162 (1922)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hubble, E.: Extragalactic nebulæ. Astrophys. J. 64, 321 (1926)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hubble, E.: The classification of spiral nebulæ. Observatory. 50, 276 (1927)ADSGoogle Scholar
  57. Hubble, E.: The Realm of the Nebulæ. Yale University Press, New Haven (1936)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Ilyina, M., Sil’chenko, O., Afanasiev, V.: Nature of star-forming rings in S0 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 439, 334 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Impey, C., Bothun, G.: Low surface brightness galaxies. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 35, 267 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Karachentsev, I.D.: Distribution of Sculptor-type dwarf systems in the Virgo cluster of galaxies. Astrophysics. 1, 118 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Karachentseva, V.E.: Sculptor-type dwarfs in galactic clusters. Astrophysics. 3, 245 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Knox-Shaw, H.: Observations of nebuæ made during 1912-1914. Helwan Obs. Bull. 15, 129 (1915)Google Scholar
  63. Kormendy, J.: Rotation of the bulge components of barred galaxies. Astrophys. J. 257, 75 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kormendy J.: Families of ellipsoidal stellar systems and the formation of dwarf elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 295, 73 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kormendy, J., Bender, R.: A revised parallel-sequence morphological classification of galaxies: structure and formation of S0 and spheroidal salaxies.Astrophys. J. Suppl. 198, 2 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kormendy, J., Illingworth, G.: Rotation of the bulge components of disk galaxies. Astrophys. J. 256, 460 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kormendy, J., Norman, C.: Observational constraints on driving mechanisms for spiral density waves. Astrophys. J. 233, 539 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R.: Multicomponent decompositions for a sample of S0 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 362, 1319 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Laurikainen, E., et al.: Bars, ovals, and lenses in early-type disk galaxies: probes of galaxy evolution. Astrophys. J. 692, 34 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R., Knapen, J.H., Comerón, S.: Photometric scaling relations of lenticular and spiral galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 1089 (2010)ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. Laurikainen, E. Salo, H., Buta, R., Knapen J.H.: Near-infrared atlas of S0-Sa galaxies (NIRS0S). Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418, 1452 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Athanassoula, E., Bosma, A., Herrera-Endoqui, M.: Milky Way mass galaxies with X-shaped bulges are not rare in the local Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 80 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lintott, C., Schawinski, K., Bamford, S., Slosar, A., Land, K., et al.: Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 166 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Longo, G., Capaccioli, M., Busarello, G. (eds.): Morphological and physical classification of galaxies. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop of the Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 178. Springer, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  75. Lotz, J., Primack, J., Madau, P.: A new nonparametric approach to galaxy morphological classification. Astron. J. 128, 163 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lütticke, R., Dettmar, R., Pohlen, M.: Box- and peanut-shaped bulges. I. Statistics. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 145, 405 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martinez-Delgado, D., Gabany, R.J., Crawford, K., Zibetti, S., Majewski, S.R., et al.: Stellar tidal streams in spiral galaxies of the local volume: a pilot survey with modest aperture telescopes. Astron. J. 140, 962 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Meidt, S.E., Schinnerer, E., Knapen, J.H., Bosma, A., Athanassoula, E., et al.: Reconstructing the stellar mass distributions of galaxies using S4G IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 μm images. I. Correcting for contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, hot dust, and intermediate-age stars. Astrophys. J. 744, 17 (2012)Google Scholar
  79. Meidt, S.E., Schinnerer, E. van de Ven, G., Zaritsky, D., Peletier, R., et al.: Reconstructing the stellar mass distributions of galaxies using S4G IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 μm images. II. The conversion from light to mass. Astrophys. J. 788, 144 (2014)Google Scholar
  80. Mirabel, I.F., Dottori, H., Lutz, D.: Genesis of a dwarf galaxy from the debris of the Antennae. Astron. Astrophys. 256, L19–L22 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  81. Moffet, A., Kannappan, S.J., Baker, A.J., Laine, S.: Extended ultraviolet disks and ultraviolet-bright disks in low-mass E/S0 galaxies. Astrophys. J. 745, 34 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Morgan, W.W.: A preliminary classification of the forms of galaxies according to their stellar population. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 70, 364 (1958)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Odewahan, S.C., Cohen, S.H., Windhorst, R.A., Philip, N.S.: Automated galaxy morphology: a Fourier approach. Astrophys. J. 568, 539 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Phillipps, S., Disney, M., Kibblewhite, E., Cawson, M.: The surface brightness of 1550 galaxies in Fornax. II - Automated galaxy surface photometry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 229, 505 (1987)Google Scholar
  85. Querejeta, M., Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., Cisternas, M., Muñoz-Mateos, J.C., et al.: The Spitzer survey of stellar structure in galaxies (S4G). The pipeline 5: high-precision stellar masses at 3.6 micron. astro-ph 1409.5126 (2014)Google Scholar
  86. Rampazzo, R., Vega, O., Bressan, A., Clemens, M. S., Marino, A., Panuzzo, P.: A Spitzer-IRS view of early-type galaxies with cuspy/core nuclei and fast/slow rotation. Astron. Astrophys. 565, A50 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Reaves, G.: Dwarf galaxies in the Virgo cluster. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 74, 392 (1962)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Reynolds, J.H.: Photometric measures of the nuclei of some typical spiral nebulæ. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 80, 746 (1920)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Reynolds, J.H.: Nebulae. The condensation in the spiral. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 85, 142 (1924)Google Scholar
  90. Reynolds, J.H.: The classification of the spiral nebulæ. Observatory. 50, 185 (1927)ADSGoogle Scholar
  91. Rix, H.-W., Rieke, M.J.: Tracing the stellar mass in M51. Astrophys. J. 418, 123 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Roberts, W.W. Jr., Roberts, M.S., Shu, F.H.: Density wave theory and the classification of spiral galaxies. Astrophys. J. 196, 381 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sánchez Almeida, J., Aguerri, J.A.L., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., de Vicente, A.: Automatic unsupervised classification of all Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7 galaxy spectra. Astrophys. J. 714, 487 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sandage, A.: The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC (1961)Google Scholar
  95. Sandage, A.: The calssification of galaxies: early history and ongoing developments. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 43, 581–624 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sandage, A., Bedke, J.: The Carnegie Atlas of Galaxies. Vols. I & II. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Washington, DC, 638 (1994)Google Scholar
  97. Sandage, A., Binggeli, B.: Studies of the Virgo cluster. III - A classification system and an illustrated atlas of Virgo cluster dwarf galaxies. Astron. J. 89, 919 (1984)Google Scholar
  98. Sandage, A. Tammann, G.A.: A Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Washington, DC, 635 (1981)Google Scholar
  99. Sandage, A., Sandage, M., Kristian, J.: Galaxies and the Universe, Stars and Stellar Systems, vol. 9, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1975)Google Scholar
  100. Schweizer, F.: Photometric studies of spiral structure. I - The disks and arms of six SB I and SC I galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 31, 313 (1976)Google Scholar
  101. Sellwood, J.A., Carlberg, R.G.: Transient spirals as superposed instabilities. Astrophys. J. 785, 137 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Serra, P., Oser, L., Krajnovic̀, D., Naab, T., Oosterloo, T., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - XXVI. H I discs in real and simulated fast and slow rotators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 3388 (2014)Google Scholar
  103. Sheth, K., Regan, M., Hinz, J. L., Gil de Paz, A., Menéndez-Delmestre, K. al.: The Spitzer survey of stellar structure in galaxies (S4G). Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 122, 1397 (2010)Google Scholar
  104. Sil’chenko, O.: Recent revolutions and unsolved problems in the galaxy evolution paradigm. Astron. Nachr. 334, 781 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Silk, J., Mamon, G.A.: The current status of galaxy formation. Research in Astron. Astrophys. 12, 917 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Simien, F., de Vaucouleurs, G.: Systematics of bulge-to-disk ratios. Astrophys. J. 302, 564 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Spitzer, L. Jr., Baade, W.: Stellar populations and collisions of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 113, 413 (1951)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Stoughton, C., et al.: Sloan Digital Sky Survey: early data release. Astron. J. 123, 485 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sulentic, J.W., Tifft, W.G.: The Revised New General Catalogue of Nonstellar Astronomical Objects. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (1973)Google Scholar
  110. Szomoru, D., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P.G.: Sizes and surface brightness profiles of quiescent galaxies at z\(\sim\) 2. Astrophys. J. 749, 121 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Thornley, M.: Uncovering spiral structure in flocculent galaxies. Astrophys. J. 469, l45 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., Tosi, M.: Star-formation histories, abundances, and kinematics of dwarf galaxies in the local group. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 371 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tsikoudi, V.: Photometry and structure of lenticular galaxies. II - NGC 4111 and NGC 4762. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 43, 365 (1980)Google Scholar
  114. van den Bergh, S.: A Catalogue of Dwarf Galaxies. Publications of the David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto. vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 147–150. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada (1959)Google Scholar
  115. van den Bergh, S.: The luminosity classification of galaxies. Astron. J. 64, 347 (1959)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. van den Bergh, S.: A new classification system for galaxies. Astrophys. J. 206, 883 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. van den Bergh, S.: Some musings on galaxy classification. Astron. J. 113, 2054 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. van den Bergh, S.: Galaxy Morphology and Classification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Van Dokkum, P.G., Leja, J., Nelson, E.J., Patel, S., Skelton, R.E., et al.: The assembly of Milky-Way-like galaxies since z\(\sim\) 2.5. Astrophys. J. 771, 35 (2013)Google Scholar
  120. Van Dokkum, P.G., Abraham, R., Merritt, A.: First results from the dragonfly telephoto array: the apparent lack of a stellar halo in the massive spiral galaxy M 101 Astropys. J. Lett. 782, L24 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vorontsov-Vel’Yaminov, B., Arkhipova, V.P.: Morphological Catalogue of Galaxies, Part I (1962)Google Scholar
  122. Watanabe, M., Kodaira, K., Okamura S.: Digital surface photometry of galaxies toward a quantitative classification. IV - Principal component analysis of surface-photometric parameters. Astrophys. J. 292, 72 (1985)Google Scholar
  123. Weinzirl, T., et al.: Bulge n and B/T in high-mass galaxies: constraints on the origin of bulges in hierarchical models. Astrophys. J. 696, 411–447 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Welch, G.: Galaxy Morphology and Classification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998); J. R. Astron. Soc. Can. 93, 201 (1999)Google Scholar
  125. Whitmore, B.C.: An objective classification system for spiral galaxies. I The two dominant dimensions. Astrophys. J. 278, 61 (1984)Google Scholar
  126. Wolf, M.: Die Klassifizierung der kleinen Nebelflecken. Publik. Astrophys. Inst. Koenigstuhl Heidelberg, 3, 109 (1908)ADSGoogle Scholar
  127. Woltjer, L.: Dynamics of gas and magnetic fields; spiral structure. In: A. Blaauw, M. Schmidt (eds.) Galactic Structure. p. 531. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1965)Google Scholar
  128. Wray, J.D.: The Color Atlas of Galaxies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  129. Young, L.M., Bureau, M., Davis, T.A., Combes, F., McDermid, R.M., et al.: The ATLAS3D project - IV. The molecular gas content of early-type galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 940 (2011)Google Scholar
  130. Zaritsky, D., Rix, H.-W., Rieke, M.: Inner spiral structure of the galaxy M51. Nature 364, 313 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zwicky, F.: Some novel features of the Whirlpool nebula as revealed by composite analytical photography. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 67, 232 (1955)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Rampazzo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mauro D’Onofrio
    • 2
  • Simone Zaggia
    • 1
  • Debra M. Elmegreen
    • 3
  • Eija Laurikainen
    • 4
  • Pierre-Alain Duc
    • 5
  • Carme Gallart
    • 6
  • Didier Fraix-Burnet
    • 7
  1. 1.INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Physics and Astronomy DepartmentVassar CollegePoughkeespleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Physics, Astronomy DivisionUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  5. 5.CEA SaclayService d’AstrophysiqueGif-sur-Yvette CedexFrance
  6. 6.Instituto de Astrofisica de CanariaLa Laguna, TenerifeSpain
  7. 7.Université de Grenoble Alpes/CNRS, IPAGGrenoble Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations