Transparent Conducting Oxides for Solar Cell Applications

  • Shadia J. IkhmayiesEmail author
Conference paper


Transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are wide bandgap semiconductors (Eg ≥3.1 eV) whose properties strongly depend on stoichiometric deviations, such as oxygen deficiency, and on the nature and quantity of impurities trapped in the host lattice. Examples of TCOs include tin oxide (SnO2), indium tin oxide (In2O3), and zinc oxide (ZnO). The best-known application of TCOs in solar cells is their use as fore contacts. High-efficiency CdTe solar cells are generally grown in a superstrate configuration, where the CdTe/CdS stacks are deposited on TCO-coated glass substrates. Another development is an application of a TCO as a back electrical contact on CdTe, leading to bifacial CdTe solar cells, which can be illuminated from one or both sides.

In this chapter, a review of the properties of TCOs of potential use in solar cells was performed, with a focus on tin oxide and zinc oxide thin films. This focus is due to the fact that these two compounds in thin film forms are technologically important materials in photovoltaic cells. The electrical, optical, structural, compositional, and morphological properties of both of these compounds are discussed.


Transparent conducting oxides Solar cells Fore contacts Tin oxide Zinc oxide 


  1. 1.
    Riveros R, Romero E, Gordillo G (2006) Synthesis and characterization of highly transparent and conductive SnO2:F and In2O3:Sn thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis. Braz J Phys 36(3):1042–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferekides CS, Mamazza R, Balasubramanian U, Morel DL (2005) Cd1−XZnXTe thin films and junctions. Thin Solid Films 480–481:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chopra KL, Dass SR (1983) Thin film solar cells. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartnagel HL, Dawar AL, Jain AK, Jagadish C (1995) Semiconducting transparent thin films. Institute of Physics, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costellamo JE (1992) Handbook of display technology. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishibashi S, Higuchi Y, Ota Y, Nakamura K (1990) Low resistivity indium-tin oxide transparent conductive films. I. Effect of introducing H2O gas or H2 gas during direct current magnetron sputtering. J Vac Sci Technol A 8:1399–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SU, Boo J-H, Hong B (2011) Structural, electrical, and optical properties of SnO2:Sb films prepared on flexible substrate at room temperature. Jpn J Appl Phys 50:01AB10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yadav AA, Masumdara EU, Moholkar AV, Neumann-Spallart M, Rajpure KY, Bhosale CH (2009) Electrical, structural and optical properties of SnO2:F thin films: effect of the substrate temperature. J Alloys Compd 488:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2013) An Investigation of the bandgap and Urbach tail of vacuum-evaporated SnO2 thin films. Renew Energy 49:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ikhmayies JS (2012) Properties of amorphous SnO2 thin films prepared by thermal evaporation. Int J Mater Chem 2(4):173–177Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2008) Effect of processing on the electrical properties of spray-deposited SnO2:F thin films. Am J Appl Sci 5(6):672–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2008) The effects of post-treatments on the photovoltaic properties of spray-deposited SnO2:F thin films. Appl Surf Sci 255:2627–2631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2009) Effect of the substrate temperature on the electrical and structural properties of spray-deposited SnO2:F thin films. Mater Sci Semicond Process 12(3):122–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2011) An investigation of the bandgap and Urbach tail of spray-deposited SnO2:F thin films. Phys Scr 84:055801 (7pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2012) Using HF rather than NH4F as doping source for spray-deposited SnO2:F thin films. J Central South Univ 19:791–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Abu El-Haija NM, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2014) A comparison between different ohmic contacts for ZnO thin films. J Semicond 36(3): 033005-1-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Abu El-Haija NM, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2010) Characterization of undoped spray-deposited ZnO thin films of photovoltaic applications. Fluid Dyn Mater Process 6(2):165–178Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Abu El-Haija NM, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2010) The influence of annealing in nitrogen atmosphere on the electrical, optical and structural properties of spray-deposited ZnO thin films. Fluid Dyn Mater Process 6(2):219–232Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikhmayies SJ, Abu El-Haija NM, Ahmad-Bitar RN (2010) Electrical and optical properties of ZnO:Al thin film prepared by the spray pyrolysis technique. Phys Scripta 81(1): art. no. 015703CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Physics DepartmentAl Isra UniversityAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations