Advertisement

Refining the Process of Science Support for Communities Around Extreme Weather Events and Climate Impacts

  • Kristina J. PetersonEmail author
  • Shirley B. Laska
  • Rosina Philippe
  • Olivia Burchett Porter
  • Richard L. Krajeski
  • Sheila Lakshmi Steinberg
  • William A. Sprigg
Chapter
Part of the Extreme Weather and Society book series (EWS)

Abstract

Native American communities along the Gulf of Mexico, separated in significant ways from contemporary tools and technology, experience and cope with weather extremes in unique and largely unknown ways. From one generation to the next there has been little communication between science, where advanced tools of warning and survival can be derived, and community, where lessons of “living off the land” can inform science of the most pressing needs and the most practical and useful technologies to fill them. This chapter describes a successful and ongoing science/community relationship to address immediate pressures of extreme weather and the resilience to confront potential threats from forces extant, including climate variability and human exploitation of natural resources. Lessons learned here, particularly those of communication and collaboration, apply around the world where both global science and self-supporting communities have become isolated from one another.

Keywords

Hurricane Indigenous perspectives Storm surge Place-based communities Participatory action research Traditional ecological knowledge Gemeinschaft Gesellschaft Climate change Extreme weather resilience Role of science 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the community members of Grand Bayou and Pointe-au-Chien who patiently participated in the climate change discussions and who have been diligently working for the sustainability of their own communities and for the betterment of all. Without the contribution of the community members of Grand Bayou this account and the study on which it is largely based would not have been possible.

References

  1. Anderson M, Brown D, Jean I (2012) Time to listen: hearing people on the receiving end of international aid. Collaborative Learning Project, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel KO (1984) Understanding and explanation: a transcendental-pragmatic perspective. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris C (1994) Knowledge for action. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Avraamidou L, Osborne J (2009) The role of narrative in communicating science. Int J Sci Educ 31(12):1683–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F (2009) Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change. J Roy Soc NZ 39(4):151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bethel MB, Brien LF, Danielson EJ et al (2011) Blending geospatial technology and traditional ecological knowledge to enhance restoration decision-support processes in coastal Louisiana. J Coast Res 27(3):555–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethel MB, Brien LF, Esposito MM et al (2014) Sci-TEK: a GIS-based multi-disciplinary method for incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into Louisiana’s coastal protection and restoration prioritization processes. J Coast Res 30(5):1081–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackburn J (ed) (1998) Who changes: institutionalizing participation in development. ITP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Coastal Wetlands, Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Task Force. Meeting Document. Lafayette, LA. P. 14, Figure 1 “CWPPRA Organization Structure.” Section 2.0. “Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force 14 May 2015Google Scholar
  10. Cochran P, Huntington OH, Pungowiyi C et al (2013) Indigenous frameworks for observing and responding to climate change in Alaska. Clim Change 120(3):557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conle C (2003) An anatomy of narrative curricula. Educ Res 32(3):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke B, Kothari U (2001) Participation: the new tyranny. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuomo CJ (2011) Climate change, vulnerability, and responsibility. Hypatia 26:690–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis L (ed) (2010) Alliances: re/envisioning indigenous-non-indigenous relationships. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  15. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Smith LT (2008) Handbook of critical indigenous methodologies. Sage Publishing, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duerden F, Beasely E (2006) Assessing community vulnerabilities to environmental change in the Inuvialuit region, NWT. In: Riewe R, Oakes J (eds) Climate change: linking traditional and scientific knowledge. University of Manitoba Indigenous Issues Press, Winnipeg, pp 123–141Google Scholar
  17. Dussel E (2013) Ethics of liberation: in the age of globalization and exclusion. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Escobar A (1999) The invention of development. Curr Hist (98)631:382–386Google Scholar
  19. First Peoples Conservation Council (2012) http://fpcclouisiana.org. Accessed 30 May 2015
  20. Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaventa J (1993) The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: the knowledge struggle in the information age. In: Park P (ed) Voices of changes; participatory research in the United States and Canada. Bergin & Garvey, Westport, pp 21–40Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger M (1971) Poetry, language, and thought. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Herda E (1999) Research conversations and narrative: a critical hermeneutic orientation in participatory inquiry. Praeger Publishers, WestportGoogle Scholar
  24. Hooke W (2010) Living on the real world. http://www.livingontherealworld.org. Accessed 30 May 2015
  25. Huntington HP (2000) Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 10(5):1270–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kent J, Taylor D (1984) Community resource management. SRM, DenverGoogle Scholar
  27. Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M (eds) (2010) Participatory action research, approaches and method: connecting people, participation and place. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Kimmerer RW (2013a) Braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimmerer RW (2013b) The fortress, the river, and the garden: a new metaphor for cultivating mutualistic relationship between scientific and traditional ecological knowledge. In: Kulneiks A, Longboat DR, Young K (eds) Contemporary studies in environmental and indigenous pedagogies: a curricula of stories and place. Sense Publishers, Boston, pp 49–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kunde J (2007) Using PAR in developing policy. Presented at the American Meteorological Society 87th Annual Conference, Civic Center, San Antonio, 16 Jan 2007Google Scholar
  31. Laska S, Phillips B, Pine J (2005) Collaborative research—small grant for exploratory research: an interdisciplinary approach to coastal vulnerability and community sustainability. National Science Foundation, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  32. Laska S (2006) Resiliency of coastal communities after Katrina. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  33. Laska S, Peterson K, Alcina ME et al (2010) Enhancing Gulf of Mexico coastal communities’ resiliency through participatory community engagement. CHART Publications. Paper 21. Available via ScholarWorks. http://scholarworks.uno.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=chart_pubs. Accessed 20 May 2015
  34. Laska S, Peterson K (2011) The convergence of catastrophes and social change: the role of participatory action research in support of the new engaged citizen. J Appl Soc Sci 5(1):24–36Google Scholar
  35. Laska S, Peterson K, Rodrigue C et al (2015) Layering of natural and human-caused disasters in the context of sea level rise: Coastal Louisiana communities at the edge. In: Companion M (ed) Disaster’s impact on livelihood and cultural survival: losses, opportunities and mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 225–239Google Scholar
  36. Leonetti C (2010) Indigenous stewardship methods and NRCS conservation practices. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  37. Levinas E (1996) Emmanuel Levinas: basic philosophical writings. University of Indiana Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynn K, Daigle J, Hoffman J et al (2013) The impacts of climate change on tribal traditional foods. Clim Change 120(3):545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maldonado JK, Shearer C, Bronen R et al (2013) The impact of climate change on tribal communities in the U.S.: displacement, relocation, and human rights. Clim Change 120(3):301–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGregor D (2008) Linking traditional ecological knowledge and Western science: Aboriginal perspectives. In Special issue (2000 State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference). Can J Nativ Stud XXVIII:139–158Google Scholar
  41. Mears J (2012) A climate change focused organization. In: Presented at the first stewards symposium: coastal peoples address climate change, Smithsonian, Washington, DC, 20 June 2012Google Scholar
  42. Naquin AP, Lesen AE, Peterson KJ (2015) ‘We can’t give up’: a conversation about community engagement. In: Lesen AE (ed) Scientists, experts, and civic engagement: walking a fine line. Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, pp 101–110Google Scholar
  43. Nienaber G (2012) Forgotten tribe on Grand Bayou La. Slammed by Isaac. Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/georgianne-nienaber/forgotten-tribe-on-grand-_b_1841905.html. Accessed on 10/15/15
  44. Park P, Brydon-Miller M, Hall B et al (eds) (1993) Voices of change: participatory research in the United States and Canada. Bergin and Garvey, WestportGoogle Scholar
  45. Park P (1993) What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In: Park P et al (eds) Voices of change: participatory research in the United States and Canada. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  46. Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson K (2015) Participatory action-citizen engagement: when knowledge comes from the academy and the community. In: Lesen AE (ed) Scientists, experts and civic engagement: walking a fine line. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 83–100Google Scholar
  48. Peterson K (2010) Transforming researchers and practitioners: the unanticipated consequences (significance) of participatory action research (PAR). Dissertation, University of New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  49. Pointe-au-Chien History. http://pactribe.tripod.com/. Retrieved Nov 2015
  50. Pound B (ed) (2003) Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods: uniting science and participation. Earthscan Publications Ltd, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council (2015) http://www.pwsrcac.org/. Accessed 30 May 2015
  52. Reason P and Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Ricoeur P (1991) From texts to action. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Ross A, Sherman R, Snodgrass JG et al (2010) Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature: knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Left Coast Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  55. Sillitoe P, Bicker A, Pottier J (eds) (2002) Participating in development: approaches to indigenous knowledge. Routledge Land, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith LT (1999, 2012) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Sprigg WA, Hinkley T (2000) (eds) Southwest Regional Assessment Group; Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Institute for the Study of Planet Earth, University of Arizona, Tucson 60 ppGoogle Scholar
  58. Tönnies F (1996) Community and society: gemeinschaft and gesellschaft. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  59. Tschakert P, Dietrich KA (2010) Anticipatory learning for climate change and resilience. Ecol Soc 15(2):11 [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art11/
  60. Tsosie R (2010) Indigenous peoples and global climate change: intercultural models of climate equity. Environ Law Litigation 25:7–18Google Scholar
  61. West J, Peterson KM, Alcina M et al (2008) Principles of participation and issues of entry for participatory action research (PAR) in coastal community resiliency enhancement collaboration. J Comm Engaged Res Learn Partnerships 1(1)Google Scholar
  62. Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  63. Whyte KP (2013) Justice forward: tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility. Clim Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0743-2 Google Scholar
  64. Wildcat DR (2009) Red alert! Saving the planet with indigenous knowledge. Fulcrum, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  65. Wisner B (2009) Why are some disasters neglected and are crisis states neglected disasters? London School of Economics, London, 28 Jan 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina J. Peterson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shirley B. Laska
    • 2
  • Rosina Philippe
    • 3
  • Olivia Burchett Porter
    • 4
  • Richard L. Krajeski
    • 2
  • Sheila Lakshmi Steinberg
    • 5
  • William A. Sprigg
    • 6
  1. 1.Lowlander CenterGrayUSA
  2. 2.The Lowlander CenterGrayUSA
  3. 3.Atakapa-Ishak/Chawasha TribePlaquemines ParishUSA
  4. 4.Loyola UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  5. 5.School of Arts and SciecnesBrandman University-Chapman University SystemIrvineUSA
  6. 6.Department of Atmospheric SciencesThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations