GPLMT: A Lightweight Experimentation and Testbed Management Framework

  • Matthias WachsEmail author
  • Nadine Herold
  • Stephan-A. Posselt
  • Florian Dold
  • Georg Carle
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9631)


Conducting experiments in federated, distributed, and heterogeneous testbeds is a challenging task for researchers. Researchers have to take care of the whole experiment life cycle, ensure the reproducibility of each run, and the comparability of the results. We present GPLMT, a flexible and lightweight framework for managing testbeds and the experiment life cycle. GPLMT provides an intuitive way to formalize experiments. The resulting experiment description is portable across varying experimentation platforms. GPLMT enables researchers to manage and control networked testbeds and resources, and conduct experiments on large-scale, heterogeneous, and distributed testbeds. We state the requirements and the design of GPLMT, describe the challenges of developing and using such a tool, and present selected user studies along with their experience of using GPLMT in varying scenarios. GPLMT is free and open source software and can be obtained from the project’s GitHub repository.


Testbed management Experimentation 



This work has been supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under support code 16KIS0145, project SURF. The authors would like to thank Matthias Jaros, Oliver Gasser for their helpful feedback, Omar Tarabai for his work on GPLMT and the integration with Zabbix.


  1. 1.
    Jaros, M.: Distribution and orchestration of network measurements on the planetlab testbed. Bachelor’s thesis, Technische Universität München, Chair for Network Architectures and Services, April 2015Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albrecht, J., Huang, D.Y.: Managing distributed applications using gush. In: Magedanz, T., Gavras, A., Thanh, N.H., Chase, J.S. (eds.) TridentCom 2010. LNICST, vol. 46, pp. 401–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quereilhac, A., Lacage, M., Freire, C., Turletti, T., Dabbous, W.: Nepi: an integration framework for network experimentation. In: 19th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), pp. 1–5, September 2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rakotoarivelo, T., Ott, M., Jourjon, G., Seskar, I.: OMF: a control and management framework for networking testbeds. ACM Oper. Syst. Rev. (OSR) 43, 54–59 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ragusa, C., Robinson, P., Svorobej, S.: A framework for modeling and execution of infrastructure contention experiments. In: 2nd Internation Workshop on Measurement-based Experimental Research, Methodology and Tools (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Genge, B., Siaterlis, C., Fovino, I.N., Masera, M.: A cyber-physical experimentation environment for the security analysis of networked industrial control systems. Comput. Electr. Eng. 38(5), 1146–1161 (2012). Special issue on Recent Advances in Security and Privacy in Distributed Communications and Image processingCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Wachs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nadine Herold
    • 1
  • Stephan-A. Posselt
    • 1
  • Florian Dold
    • 2
  • Georg Carle
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of Munich (TUM)GarchingGermany
  2. 2.Chair for Network Architectures and Services, Department for Informatics Technical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations