Heuristic Assessment of Parameters of the Local Ground Approximation from Terrestrial LIDAR Data

  • Marcin Bator
  • Leszek J. Chmielewski
  • Arkadiusz Orłowski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9555)


The recently proposed quality measure is used to find the local ground approximation (LGA) from the data measured with the terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). The measure is the number of points in a thin layer located directly above the approximating surface. It can be optimized with the hill climbing algorithm. The method is robust against the data which can be treated as outliers from the ground model, so the TLS data have neither to be filtered nor segmented into those pertaining to the ground and to other objects (trees or lower vegetation). The results are compared with those obtained with the Hough transform-based method and assessed visually, with a positive result. If the ground does not depart too far from the assumed planar shape, the errors are small in relation to those obtained with other measurement modalities.


Local ground approximation LGA Terrestrial laser scanning TLS Quality measure Optimization Digital terrain model DTM 


  1. 1.
    Sithole, G., Vosselman, G.: Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 59(1–2), 85–101 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Srinivasan, S., Popescu, S., Eriksson, M., Sheridan, R., Ku, N.W.: Terrestrial laser scanning as an effective tool to retrieve tree level height, crown width, and stem diameter. Remote Sens. 7(2), 1877–1896 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stereńczak, K., Zasada, M., Brach, M.: The accuracy assessment of DTM generated from LIDAR data for forest area - a case study for Scots pine stands in Poland. Baltic For. 19(2), 252–262 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costantino, D., Angelini, M.: Production of DTM quality by TLS data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 46, 80–103 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eltner, A., Mulsow, C., Maas, H.G.: Quantitative measurement of soil erosion from TLS and UAV data. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2, 119–124 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puttonen, E., Krooks, A., Kaartinen, H., Kaasalainen, S.: Ground level determination in forested environment with utilization of a scanner-centered terrestrial laser scanning configuration. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 12(3), 616–620 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dassot, M., Colin, A., Santenoise, P., Fournier, M., Constant, T.: Terrestrial laser scanning for measuring the solid wood volume, including branches, of adult standing trees in the forest environment. Comput. Electron. Agric. 89, 86–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stereńczak, K., Kozak, J.: Evaluation of digital terrain models generated in forest conditions from airborne laser scanning data acquired in two seasons. Scand. J. For. Res. 26(4), 374–384 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zasada, M., Stereńczak, K., Dudek, W., Rybski, A.: Horizon visibility and accuracy of stocking determination on circular sample plots using automated remote measurement techniques. For. Ecol. Manage. 302, 171–177 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chmielewski, L.J., Orłowski, A.: Ground level recovery from terrestrial laser scanning data with the variably randomized iterated hierarchical hough transform. In: Azzopardi, G., Petkov, N., Yamagiwa, S. (eds.) CAIP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9256, pp. 630–641. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23192-1_53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bator, M., Chmielewski, L.J., Orłowski, A.: Where is the ground? quality measures for the planar digital terrain model in terrestrial laser scanning. In: Murino, V., Puppo, E. (eds.) ICIAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9279, pp. 343–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23231-7_31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michalewicz, Z., Fogel, D.B.: How to Solve it: Modern Heuristics. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcin Bator
    • 1
  • Leszek J. Chmielewski
    • 1
  • Arkadiusz Orłowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Applied Informatics and Mathematics (WZIM)Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW)WarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations