Liver Resection

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Liver resection has been transformed from a high-risk procedure to one that is now performed frequently with a minimal mortality and acceptable morbidity. In-depth preoperative assessment and risk stratification of patients undergoing liver surgery, in addition to advancements in perioperative care and surgical techniques, play a significant role in risk reduction. This chapter aims to emphasize important aspects of preoperative evaluation such as assessment of liver function and prediction of the future liver remnant. Operative guidelines and essential techniques, such as minimal invasive liver surgery, are also addressed in addition to alternative management for nonsurgical candidates.

Keywords

Liver resection Operative management Liver disease Perioperative management Surgical techniques 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Belghiti J et al. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(1):38–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruix J, Sherman M, Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42(5):1208–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Srinevas K, Andrew S, Ryan S, Gamblin TC, et al. Major liver resection in elderly patients: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(5):787–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho S, Steel J, Tsung A, et al. Safety of liver resection in the elderly: how important is age? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(4):1088–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nordlinger B et al. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: a prognostic scoring system to improve case selection based on 1,568 patients. Association Française de Chirurgie. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1254–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagao T et al. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical features and long-term prognosis. Ann Surg. 1987;205(1):33–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Child CG et al. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pugh RN et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamath PS et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lam CM et al. Major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with an unsatisfactory indocyanine green clearance test. Br J Surg. 1999;86(8):1012–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shoup M et al. Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(3):325–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shindoh J, Tzeng CW, Aloia T, et al. Optimal future liver remnant in patients treated with extensive preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2493.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Azoulay D et al. Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):665–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):405–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rubin GD. 3-D imaging with MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45 Suppl 1:S37–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palmucci S et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary pathology. Radiol Med. 2010;115:732–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strasberg S. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jarnagin WR et al. A prospective analysis of staging laparoscopy in patients with hepatobiliary primary and secondary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:34–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kooby DA et al. Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2003;237(6):860–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jarnagin W et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236:397–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Balaa FK, Gamblin TC, Tsung A, et al. Right hepatic lobectomy using the staple technique in 101 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(2):338–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc. 1992;6:97–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection: 2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buell JF et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nguyen KT et al. Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):842–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Surgical OncologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations