Advertisement

Cholangioscopy and Biliary Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy

  • Kunal Karia
  • Angela Saul
  • Amy Tyberg
  • Monica Gaidhane
  • Michel KahalehEmail author
Chapter
  • 534 Downloads

Abstract

The evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures is challenging due to the low sensitivity of routine sampling at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Cholangioscopy allows for direct visualization of the biliary mucosa. Confocal laser endomicroscopy is an in vivo imaging technique that provides real-time optical biopsies. Both modalities have the potential to increase diagnostic yields at the time of ERCP. This chapter will focus on the current data available for those two technologies.

Keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Indeterminate biliary stricture Cholangioscopy Confocal laser endomicroscopy Choledocholithiasis Lithotripsy SpyGlass Cellvizio 

Supplementary material

Video 12.1

Colangiocscopy (MP4 21306 kb)

Video 12.2

pCLE (MP4 13227 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    McIver MA. An instrument for visualizing the interior of the common ductal operation. Surgery. 1941;9:112.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parsi MA. Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASGE Technology Committee, Shah RJ, Adler DG, Conway JD, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kantsevoy SV, et al. Cholangiopancreatoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:411–21.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:832–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brauer BC, Shah RJ. Cholangioscopy in liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;18:927–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moon JH, Choi HJ. The role of direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultraslim endoscope for biliary lesions: indications, limitations, and complications. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:537–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osanai M, Itoi T, Igarashi Y, Tanaka K, Kida M, Maguchi H, et al. Peroral videocholangioscopy to evaluate indeterminate bile duct lesions and preoperative mucosal cancerous extension: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:635–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parsi MA, Jang S, Sanaka M, Stevens T, Vargo JJ. Diagnostic and therapeutic cholangiopancreatoscopy: performance of a new digital cholangioscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:936–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sethi A, Widmer J, Shah NL, Pleskow DK, Edmundowicz AS, Sejpal DV, et al. Interobserver agreement for evaluation of imaging with single operator choledochoscopy: What are we looking at? Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:518–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oh HC, Lee SK, Lee TY, Kwon S, Lee SS, Seo DW, Kim MH. Analysis of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy related complications and the risk factors for those complications. Endoscopy. 2007;39:731–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL, Brown WR, Brauer BC, Fukami NN, et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:251–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itoi T, Moon JH, Waxman I. Current status of direct peroral cholangioscopy. Dig Endosc. 2011;23 Suppl 1:154–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi JH, Lee SK. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy: does its role still exist? Clin Endosc. 2013;46:529–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H, Ebata T, Igami T, Nimura Y. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1860–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramachandani M, Reddy N, Gupta R, Lakhtakia S, Tandan M, Darisetty S, et al. Role of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:511–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nishikawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, Sugiyama H, Miyazaki M, Yokosuko O. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of peroral video-cholangioscopic visual findings and cholangioscopy-guided forceps biopsy findings for indeterminate biliary lesions: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:219–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun X, Zhou Z, Tian J, Wang Z, Huang Q, Fan K, et al. Is single-operator peroral cholangioscopy a useful tool for the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(1):79–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF, Hawes RH, Pleskow DK, Slivka A, et al. Single operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:805–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Bellis M, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Chappo J, Younger C, et al. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:176–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tieu AH, Kumbhari V, Jakhete N, Onyimba F, Patel Y, Shin EJ, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of SpyGlass peroral cholangioscopy in intraductal biliary disease: Single-center, retrospective, cohort study. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(4):479–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manta R, Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R, Maccio L, Melotti G, Dabizzi E, et al. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective, cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1569–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farnik H, Weigt J, Malfertheiner P, Grützmann A, Gossner L, Friedrich-Rust M, et al. A multicenter study on the role of direct retrograde cholangioscopy in patients with inconclusive endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy. 2014;46:16–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arnelo U, Seth E, Bergquist A. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 2015;47(8):696–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patel SN, Rosenkranz L, Hooks B, Tarnasky PR, Raijman I, Fishman DS, et al. Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary calculi using single-operator cholangioscopy: a multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:344–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB, Kim YI, Kortan PK. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2330–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moon JH, Ko BM, Choi HJ, Koo HC, Hong SJ, Cheon YK, et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for the treatment of retained bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2729–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Layfield LJ, Cramer H, Madden J, Gopez E, Lui K. Atypical squamous epithelium in cytologic specimens from the pancreas: cytological differential diagnosis and clinical implications. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;25:38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim HJ, Kim MH, Lee SK, Yoo KS, Seo DW, Min YI. Tumor vessel: a valuable cholangioscopic clue of malignant biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:635–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, Sugiyama H, Miyakawa K, Ishihara T, Ohtsuka M, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:230–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang X, Cai YQ, Chen YH, Liu XB. Biliary tract intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: Report of 19 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(14):4261–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woo YS, Lee JK, Oh SH, Kim MJ, Jung JG, Lee KH, et al. Role of SpyGlass peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:2565–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nwaneshiudu A, Kuschal C, Sakamoto FH, Anderson RR, Schwarzenberger K, Young RC. Introduction to confocal microscopy. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(12):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith I, Kline PE, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. A review on the use of confocal laser endomicroscopy in the bile duct. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mauna Kea Technologies [Internet]. Cellvizio 100 Series datasheet. 2013 Nov [cited 2015 Mar 3]. www.maunakeatech.com
  35. 35.
    Neumann H, Kiesslich R, Wallace MB, Neurath MF. Confocal laser endomicroscopy: technical advances and clinical applications. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(2):388–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, Dekker E, et al. Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011;43(10):882–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kwan AS, Barry C, McAllister L, Constable I. Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(1):33–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Becker V, von Delius S, Bajbouj M, et al. Intravenous application of fluorescein for confocal laser scanning microscopy: evaluation of contrast dynamics and image quality with increasing injection-to-imaging time. Gastointest Endosc. 2008;68(2):319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F, et al. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:565–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bangarulingam SY, Bjornsson E, Enders F, et al. Long-term outcomes of positive fluorescence in situ hybridization tests in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:174–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meining A, Shah RJ, Slivka A, et al. Classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings in pancreaticobiliary strictures. Endoscopy. 2012;44(3):251–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caillol F, Bories E, Poizat F, et al. Endomicroscopy in bile duct: Inflammation interferes with pCLE applied in the bile duct: a prospective study of 54 patients. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013;1(2):120–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Caillol F, Filoche B, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Refined probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy classification of biliary strictures: the paris classification. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1784–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Slivka A, Gan I, Jamidar P, et al. Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the characterization of indeterminate biliary strictures: results of a prospective multicenter international study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(2):282–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Meining A, Chen YK, Pleskow D, et al. Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(5):961–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Talreja JP, Turner BG, Gress FG, et al. Pre- and post-training session evaluation for interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for biliary strictures. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:577–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shieh FK, Drumm H, Nathanson MH, Jamidar PA. High-definition confocal endomicroscopy of the common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46(5):401–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cellvizio [Internet]. Downstream revenue generated by Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) in Undetermined Pancreaticobiliary lesions. http://www.cellvizio.net/sites/default/files/issu_presentation/ICCU2014%20-%20Sharaiha.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kunal Karia
    • 1
  • Angela Saul
    • 1
  • Amy Tyberg
    • 1
  • Monica Gaidhane
    • 1
  • Michel Kahaleh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations