Advertisement

Guided Play: A Solution to the Play Versus Learning Dichotomy

  • Tamara Spiewak ToubEmail author
  • Vinaya Rajan
  • Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
  • Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Chapter
Part of the Evolutionary Psychology book series (EVOLPSYCH)

Abstract

A fundamental question guiding early childhood education research is the ideological debate of how children learn. A dichotomy exists, suggesting that play and learning are mutually exclusive. Evolutionary perspectives can offer insight into how to best educate children and what the role of play might be. We consider the evolutionary perspectives of Peter Gray, who proposes that humans evolved to primarily learn from self-directed free play and exploration, and David Geary, who advocates using direct instruction to promote biologically secondary (i.e., non-evolved) skills. In this chapter, we embrace guided play, which is a type of playful learning that combines the benefits of free play with the value of direct instruction to promote academic, socio-emotional, and cognitive development. In guided play, an adult supports children’s learning through scaffolding techniques while still maintaining child-led direction. We discuss how guided play naturally incorporates four key pillars for effective learning. Specifically, we synthesize research demonstrating that humans learn best when: (1) they take an active role in the learning environment, (2) they are engaged, (3) information is meaningful, and (4) they interact in a social context. We conclude by suggesting possible avenues for future research on guided play.

Keywords

Guided play Playful learning Play Education Early childhood Evolutionary perspectives Pedagogy Science of learning Direct instruction Discovery learn 

References

  1. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2010). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1037/a0021017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, A. L., & Booth, A. E. (2014). Motivated by meaning: Testing the effect of knowledge-infused rewards on preschoolers’ persistence. Child Development, 85(2), 783–791. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, D. R., & Hanson, K. G. (2010). From blooming, buzzing confusion to media literacy: The early development of television viewing. Developmental Review, 30(2), 239–255. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5(3), 25–50. doi: 10.2307/1602366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berch, D. B. (2007). Instructing evolved minds: Pedagogically primary strategies for promoting biologically secondary learning. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 109–118). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  8. Berch, D. B. (2013). Evolutionary theory can inform the intelligent design of educational policy and practice. Retrieved from https://evolution-institute.org/project/education/evolutionary-theory-can-inform-the-intelligent-design-of-educational-policy-and-practice/.
  9. Bjorklund, D. F. (2007). The most educable of animals. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 119–129). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  10. Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Borun, M., Chambers, M., & Cleghorn, A. (1996). Families are learning in science museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 39, 123–138. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1996.tb01084.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  13. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed August 4, 2015).Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood education experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 231–242. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiong, C., & DeLoache, J. S. (2012). Learning the ABCs: What kinds of picture books facilitate young children’s learning? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2), 225–241. doi: 10.1177/1468798411430091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickinson, D. K., Nesbitt, K. T., Collins, M. F., Hadley, E. B., Newman, K., Rivera, B., … Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2016). Using book reading to teach for breadth and depth of vocabulary. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  18. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.
  19. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Elkind, D. (2008). Can we play? Greater Good, 4, 14–17. Retrieved from http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_we_play/.Google Scholar
  21. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrara, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N., & Golinkoff, R. (2011). Block talk: Spatial language during block play. Mind, Brain & Education, 5(3), 143–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01122.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher, A. V., Godwin, K. E., & Seltman, H. (2014). Visual environment, attention allocation, and learning in young children: When too much of a good thing may be bad. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1362–1370. doi: 10.1177/0956797614533801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Singer, D. G., & Berk, L. (2010). Playing around in school: Implications for learning and educational policy. In A. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 341–363). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, K. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Taking shape: Supporting preschoolers’ acquisition of geometric knowledge through guided play. Child Development, 84(6), 1872–1878. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and change in children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychology, 50(1), 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geary, D. C. (2007a). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 1–99). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  29. Geary, D. C. (2007b). Reflections and refinements. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 177–203). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  30. Ginsburg, H. P., Pappas, S., & Seo, K. (2001). Everyday mathematical knowledge: Asking young children what is developmentally appropriate. In S. L. Golbeck (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on early childhood education: Reframing dilemmas in research and practice (pp. 181–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Goldin-Meadow, S., Levine, S. C., Hedges, L. V., Huttenlocher, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Small, S. L. (2014). New evidence about language and cognitive development based on a longitudinal study: Hypotheses for intervention. American Psychologist, 69(6), 588–599. doi: 10.1037/a0036886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Golinkoff, R. M., Deniz Can, D., Soderstrom, M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2015). (Baby)talk to me: The social context of infant-directed speech and its effects on early language acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2016). Becoming brilliant: What science tells us about raising successful children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gopnik, A., Griffiths, T. L., & Lucas, C. G. (2015). When younger learners can be better (or at least more open-minded) than older ones. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 87–92. doi: 10.1177/0963721414556653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York, NY: Morrow Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gray, P. (2011). The evolutionary biology of education: How our hunter-gatherer educative instincts could form the basis for education today. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 28–40. doi: 10.1007/s12052-010-0306-1.Google Scholar
  37. Gray, P. (2013). Free to Learn: Why unleashing the instinct to play will make our children happier, more self-reliant, and better students for life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Haden, C. A. (2002). Talking about science in museums. Child Development, 4, 62–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  40. Hassinger-Das, B., Ridge, K., Parker, A., Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Dickinson, D. K. (2016). Building vocabulary knowledge in preschoolers through shared book-reading and game play. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  41. Hassinger-Das., B., Toub, T. S., Ilgaz, H., Weisberg, D., Nesbitt, K. T., Collins, M. F., & Nicolopoulou, A. (2015). Playing to learn: How book-reading + guided play can improve vocabulary for low-income preschoolers. In T. S. Toub (Chair), Beyond book-reading: Promoting vocabulary development through innovative activities. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
  42. Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317(5843), 1360–1366. doi: 10.1126/science.1146282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Owen, M. T., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A., … Suma, K. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children’s language success. Psychological Science, 26, 1071–1083. doi: 10.1177/0956797615581493.
  44. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2003). Einstein never used flashcards: How our children really learn and why they need to play more and memorize less. Emmaus, PA: Rosedale.Google Scholar
  45. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2011). The great balancing act: Optimizing core curricula through playful learning. In E. Zigler, W. S. Gilliam, & W. S. Barnett (Eds.), The pre-K debates: Current controversies and issues (pp. 110–115). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  46. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L. E., & Singer, D. G. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in school: Presenting the evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J., Robb, M., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1177/1529100615569721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1983). Effects of script structure on children’s story recall. Developmental Psychology, 19(4), 625–635. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.19.4.625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vols. 1 & 2). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ilgaz, H., Weisberg, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Nicolopoulou, A. (2013). Not all play is created equal: When playful learning sparks vocabulary acquisition in low-income children. In D. Dickinson (Chair), Effects of varied types of adult-supported play on preschool children’s receptive vocabulary learning. Seattle, WA: Society for Research on Child Development.Google Scholar
  52. Imuta, K., & Scarf, D. (2014). When too much of a novel thing may be what’s ‘bad’: Commentary on Fisher, Godwin, and Seltman (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F., & Yawkey, T. D. (1999). Play and early childhood development. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  54. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 89(1), 47–62. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47.Google Scholar
  55. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kittredge, A. K., Klahr, D., & Fisher, A. V. (2014). Direct instruction of discovery. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  57. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kochuk, N., & Ratnayaka, M. (2007). NCLB/ESEA: It’s time for a change! Voices from America’s classrooms. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  59. Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10(1), 110–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Leopold, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). An imagination effect in learning from scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 47–63. doi: 10.1037/a0037142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lillard, A. (2001). Pretend play as twin earth: A social-cognitive analysis. Developmental Review, 21(4), 495–531. doi: 10.1006/drev.2001.0532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lillard, A. S. (2013). Playful learning and Montessori education. American Journal of Play, 5(2), 157–186.Google Scholar
  63. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50(4), 315–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Marcon, R. A. (1999). Differential impact of preschool models on development and early learning of inner-city children: A three-cohort study. Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 358–375. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Marcon, R. (2002). Moving up the grades: Relationships between preschool model and later school success. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 4(1), 517–530.Google Scholar
  66. Mashburn, A. J., Justice, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Peer effects on children’s language achievement during pre-kindergarten. Child Development, 80(3), 686–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01291.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 405–412. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.84.4.405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  69. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Research-based principles for designing multimedia instruction. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology website, http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php.Google Scholar
  70. Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50–51. doi: 10.1126/science.1168927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288. doi: 10.1126/science.1175626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crisis in kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood.Google Scholar
  73. Morrow, L. M., & Rand, M. K. (1991). Promoting literacy during play by designing early childhood classroom environments. Reading Teacher, 44(6), 396–402. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20200675.Google Scholar
  74. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB, 2001). Public Law 107–110, USA.Google Scholar
  75. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). PISA 2012 Results: What Student Know and Can Do—Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume 1). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-I.pdf.
  76. Parish-Morris, J., Mahajan, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Collins, M. F. (2013). Once upon a time: Parent-child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 200–211. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pellegrini, A. D. (2009). The role of play in human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pellegrini, A. D., & Galda, L. (1990). Children’s play, language, and early literacy. Topics in Language Disorders, 10(3), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pruden, S. M., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter? Developmental Science, 14(6), 1417–1430. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Ramani, G. B., Siegler, R. S., & Hitti, A. (2012). Taking it to the classroom: Number board games as a small group learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 661–672. doi: 10.1037/a0028995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Reed, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2016). Learning on hold: Cell phones sidetrack parent-child interactions. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  82. Resnick, M. (2004). Edutainment? No thanks. I prefer playful learning. Associazione Civita Report on Edutainment, 14, 1–4.Google Scholar
  83. Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85(3), 956–970. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Schwamborn, A., Mayer, R. E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 872–879. doi: 10.1037/a0019640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sénéchal, M., Thomas, E., & Monker, J. (1995). Individual differences in 4-year-old children’s acquisition of vocabulary during storybook reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 218–229. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Shuell, T. J. (1990). Phases of meaningful learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 531–547. doi: 10.3102/00346543060004531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Singer, D. G., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2006). Play: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (2005). Imagination and play in the electronic age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sunderman, G. L., Tracey, C. A., Kim, J., & Orfield, G. (2004). Listening to teachers: Classroom realities and No Child Left Behind. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489176.pdf.Google Scholar
  92. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 9–31. doi: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021808.72598.4d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sweller, J. (2007). Evolutionary biology and educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 165–175). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  94. Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Kuchirko, Y., & Song, L. (2014). Why is infant language learning facilitated by parental responsiveness? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 121–126. doi: 10.1177/0963721414522813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tare, M., Chiong, C., Ganea, P., & DeLoache, J. (2010). Less is more: How manipulative features affect children’s learning from picture books. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 395–400. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Toub, T. S., Hassinger-Das., B., Nesbitt, K. T., Unlutabak, B., Wilson, S., Nicolopoulou, A., … Dickinson, D. (2015, March). Playing for words: Best practices for guided play in support of vocabulary development. In B. Hassinger-Das (Chair), Learning to play: Identifying and assessing key elements of playful learning. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  97. Toub, T. S., Hassinger-Das, B., Nesbitt, K. T., Ilgaz, H., Weisberg, D. S., Collins, M. F., … Dickinson, D. (2016). The language of play: Developing preschool vocabulary through play following shared book-reading. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  98. Troseth, G. L., Saylor, M. M., & Archer, A. H. (2006). Young children’s use of video as a source of socially relevant information. Child Development, 77(3), 786–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00903.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Viadero, D. (2007). Teachers say NCLB has changed classroom practice. Education Week, 26, 6–22. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/06/20/42rand.h26.html.Google Scholar
  100. Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2010). Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 479–485. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Weisberg, D. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2014). Mise en place: Setting the stage for thought and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 276–278. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Weisberg, D. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Guided play: Where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(2), 104–112. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Weisberg, D. S., Kittredge, A. K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Klahr, D. (2015). Guided play: Making play work for education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Weisberg, D. S., Zosh, J. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Talking it up: Play, language, and the role of adult support. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 39–54. Retrieved from http://www.journalofplay.org/.Google Scholar
  105. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872. doi: 10.2307/1132208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Wolfgang, C. H., Stannard, L. L., & Jones, I. (2003). Advanced construction play with LEGOs among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. Early Child Development and Care, 173(5), 467–475. doi: 10.1080/0300443032000088212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zevenbergen, A. A., Whitehurst, G. J., & Zevenbergen, J. A. (2003). Effects of a shared-reading intervention on the inclusion of evaluative devices in narratives of children from low-income families. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(03)00021-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177–1198. doi: 10.1002/tea.20443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zosh, J. M., Brinster, M., & Halberda, J. (2013). Optimal contrast: Competition between two referents improves word learning. Applied Developmental Science, 17(1), 20–28. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2013.748420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamara Spiewak Toub
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vinaya Rajan
    • 2
  • Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
    • 3
  • Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral and Social SciencesUniversity of the SciencesPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.School of Education and Departments of Psychology and Linguistics and Cognitive ScienceUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  4. 4.Brookings InstitutionWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations