Advertisement

Crowd Behaviour and Collective Action

  • Stephen T. La Macchia
  • Winnifred R. Louis
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the contribution of social identity theory to understanding crowd behaviour and collective action, and discuss possibilities for continued theoretical integration and promoting social change. We first review the major theories of crowd behaviour, including social identity theories. We discuss how the latter have addressed the limitations of prior theories and provided explanatory accounts of specific riot events, leading towards a conceptual and theoretical synthesis of collective action and crowd behaviour. We then discuss social identity theories (and prior theories) of collective action, their apparent disconnect from social identity theories of crowd behaviour, and the possibilities for theoretical integration between the two areas. Finally, we address the role of social identity in peace and conflict more broadly, and discuss future directions in this area of research.

Keywords

Social identification Social movements Policing Protest Theoretical integration 

References

  1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Oxford, England: Harpers.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, F. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., & Wagner, U. (2011). Emotional consequences of collective action participation: Differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1587–1598. doi: 10.1177/0146167211414145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackwood, L. M., & Louis, W. R. (2012). If it matters for the group then it matters to me: Collective action outcomes for seasoned activists. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 72–92. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02001.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumer, H. (1951). Social movements. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), New outline of the principles of sociology (Vol. 29, pp. 1–51). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–226). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Fraser, S. C., Beaman, A. L., & Kelem, R. T. (1976). Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(2), 178–183. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.2.178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(Suppl 2), 382–389. doi: 10.1037/h0057906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gusfield, J. R. (1963). Symbolic crusade. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  12. Handler, J. F. (1992). Postmodernism, protest, and the new social movements. Law & Society Review, 26(4), 697–731. doi: 10.2307/3053811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., & Platow, M. J. (2013). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. doi: 10.2307/2095417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2008). Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 992–1012. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lane, R. E. (1965). The politics of consensus in an age of affluence. The American Political Science Review, 59(4), 874–895. doi: 10.2307/1953211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lasswell, H. D. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. Oxford, England: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Le Bon, G. (1947). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Ernest Benn. (Original work published 1895).Google Scholar
  19. Louis, W. R. (2014). Peace and conflict as group norms. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(2), 180–186. doi: 10.1037/pac0000018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Louis, W. R., La Macchia, S. T., Amiot, C. E., Thomas, E. F., Blackwood, L. M., Mavor, K. I., et al. (2016). Causality in the study of collective action and political behaviour. In F. M. Moghaddam & R. Harré (Eds.), Questioning causality: Scientific explorations of cause and consequence across social contexts. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Louis, W. R., Mavor, K. I., La Macchia, S. T., & Amiot, C. E. (2014). Social justice and psychology: What is, and what should be. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(1), 14–27. doi: 10.1037/a0033033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. doi: 10.2307/2777934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind: A sketch of the principles of collective psychology with some attempt to apply them to the interpretation of national life and character. Oxford, England: Putnam.Google Scholar
  24. McGarty, C., Bliuc, A.-M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 839–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01627.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(3), 238–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reicher, S. D. (1984a). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23(4), 341–350. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00650.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reicher, S. D. (1984b). The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420140102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reicher, S. D. (1996). “The Battle of Westminster”: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 115–134. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<115::AID-EJSP740>3.0.CO;2-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reicher, S. D. (2000). Crowd behavior. Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 374–377). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., Platow, M., & Steffens, N. (2016). Tyranny and leadership. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Theoretical, contemporary and worldwide perspectives. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Reicher, S. D., & Stott, C. (2011). Mad mobs and Englishmen? Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
  32. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Saab, R., Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Cheung, W.-Y. (2014). Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 539–560. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saeri, A. K., Iyer, A., & Louis, W. R. (2015). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict outsiders’ responses to external group conflict: Implications for identification, anger, and collective action. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., & Kessler, T. (2013). Leader performance and prototypicality: Their inter‐relationship and impact on leaders’ identity entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 606–613. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the ‘poll tax riot’. Human Relations, 53(2), 247–273.Google Scholar
  39. Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352. doi: 10.1177/1088868308323223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swaab, R., Postmes, T., van Beest, I., & Spears, R. (2007). Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared identity in negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 187–199. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sweetman, J., Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Pratto, F., & Saab, R. (2013). “I Have a Dream”: A typology of social change goals. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 293–320. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v1i1.85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tabri, N., & Conway, M. (2011). Negative expectancies for the group’s outcomes undermine normative collective action: Conflict between Christian and Muslim groups in Lebanon. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 649–669. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02071.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263–276. doi: 10.1177/0146167213510525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. doi: 10.1177/1088868309341563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. doi: 10.1177/0146167294205002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1972). Collective behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  49. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987). Collective behavior (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  50. van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “Passionate Economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180–199. doi: 10.1177/1088868311430835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2010). Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zaal, M. P., Van Laar, C., Ståhl, T., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 670–689. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02069.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237–307.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations