The Potential for Sustainable Production and Consumption in a Technological Society

Chapter

Abstract

The French philosopher Jacques Ellul articulated the concept of the technological society in 1954 to describe the deeply interwoven relationship between social, cultural, economic, political and technical factors that exists in mature industrial societies. Some commentators have seen a continuing role for this concept pertinent to understanding the broad social dynamics of technological change. This chapter draws on current commentary to investigate the implications for change in existing processes of production and consumption through sustainable innovation. It reviews current thinking in the social studies of technology to identify the ways in which discourses of sustainable innovation might not transform socio-technical systems in the manner conceived by proponents. It identifies how technical characteristics relating to sustainable performance of a particular artefact could fail to transfer from artefact to system or from innovation to widespread adoption and use. In conclusion, it is suggested that calls for sustainable innovation represent part of the ‘business as usual’ operations of a technological society.

Keywords

Boundary spanning Discourse Jacques Ellul Social change Sustainable innovation Technological change Technological society 

References

  1. Akrich, M., 1992: “The De-scription of Technical Objects,” in: Bijker, W.E.; Law, J., (Eds.): Shaping Technology/Building Society (Cambridge MA: MIT Press): 205–224.Google Scholar
  2. Afuah, A., 2003: Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation and Profits (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Agbemabiese, L.; Byrne, J., 2005: “Commodification of Ghana’s Volta River: An Example of Ellul’s Autonomy of Technique”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 25: 17–25.Google Scholar
  4. Agazzi, E., 1998: “From Technique to Technology: The Role of Modern Science”, in: Techne, 4,2: 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Berkout, F.; Smith, A.; Stirling, A., 2004: Socio-technical Regimes and Transition Contexts. In: Elzen, B.; Geels, F.W.; Green, K. (Eds.): System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 48–75.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, E.; Wield, D., 1994: “Regulation as a Means for the Social Control of Technology”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 6,3: 259–272.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, N.; Michael, M., 2003: “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15,1: 3–18.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D., 2005: “Complexity, Configurations and Cases”, in: Theory, Culture and Society, 22,5: 95–111.Google Scholar
  9. Cameron, D., 2013: Green Economy. Speech Address at the Launch of the DECC’s Energy Efficiency Mission; at: http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/opinion/2241323/camerons-green-economy-speech-in-full (8 July 2014).
  10. Carter, N., 2007: The Politics of the Environment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Carson, R., 1962: Silent Spring (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
  12. Cillers, P., 2005: “Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism”, in: Theory Culture and Society, 22: 255–267.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, M.J., 2000: “Ecological Modernisation, Environmental Knowledge and National Character: A Preliminary Analysis of the Netherlands”, in: Environmental Politics, Special Edition, 9,1: 77–106.Google Scholar
  14. Coles, A-M.; Harris, L., 2006: “Ethical Consumers and E-commerce: The Emergence and Growth of Fair Trade in the UK”, in: Journal of Research for Consumers, 10; at: http://www.jrconsumers.com/.
  15. Coles, A-M.; Peters, S.R., 2003: “Sustainable Development, Global Innovation and Advanced Technologies: The Case of Fuel Cells”, in: International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 3,3/4: 278–289.Google Scholar
  16. Coles, A-M.; Yan, L., 2010: “Transnational Entrepreneurship in Action: Traditional Chinese Medicine in the UK”, in: Proceedings of the 33 Institute of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference, London, 2–4 November. Google Scholar
  17. Collingridge, D., 1980: The Social Control of Technology (London: Frances Pinter).Google Scholar
  18. Collingridge, D., 1989: “Incremental Decision Making in Technological Innovation: What Role for Science?” in: Science, Technology and Human Values, 14,2: 141–162.Google Scholar
  19. Collingridge, D., 1990: “Technology Organizations and Incrementalism: The Space Shuttle”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management”, 2,2: 181–200.Google Scholar
  20. Collingridge, D., 1992: The Management of Scale: Big Organisations, Big Decisions, Big Mistakes (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  21. Commoner, B., 1971: The Closing Circle: Nature, Man and Technology (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
  22. Connelly, J.; Smith, G., 1999: Politics and the Environment: From Theory to Practice (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  23. Conway, S., 1995: “Informal Boundary Spanning: Communication in the Innovation Process”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7(3): 327–342.Google Scholar
  24. Coombs, R.; Hull, R., 1998: “Knowledge Management Practices and Path Dependency in Innovation”, in: Research Policy, 27: 237–253.Google Scholar
  25. Coutard, O., 1999: “Introduction: The Evolving Forms of Governance of Large Technical Systems”, in: Coutard, O. (Ed.): The Governance of Large Technical Systems (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  26. Davies, P.W.F., 1997: “Technology and Business Ethics Theory”, in: Business Ethics: A European Review, 6,2: 76–80.Google Scholar
  27. De Laat, B., 2000: “Scripts for the Future: Using Innovation Studies to Design Foresight Tools”, in: Brown, N.; Rappert, B.; Webster, A. (Eds.): Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  28. Dobson, A., 2003: Citizenship and the Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Ellul, J., 1954: La Technique ou L’enjeu du Siècle (Paris: Armand Colin).Google Scholar
  30. Ellul, J., 1964: The Technological Society (New York: Vintage Books).Google Scholar
  31. Ellul, J., 1980: The Technological System (New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
  32. Ellul, J., 1984: Money and Power (Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship).Google Scholar
  33. Ellul, J., 1989: What I Believe (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).Google Scholar
  34. Ellul, J., 1990: The Technological Bluff (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).Google Scholar
  35. Feenberg, A., 1999: Questioning Technology (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  36. Fisher, D.; Freudenburg, W., 2001: “Ecological Modernisation and its Critics: Assessing the Past and Looking Toward the Future”, in: Society and Natural Resources, 14: 701–709.Google Scholar
  37. Foray, D.; Grubler, A., 1996: “Technology and the Environment: An Overview”, in: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53,3: 1–13.Google Scholar
  38. Freeman, C., 1996: “The Greening of Technology and Models of Innovation”, in: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53,3: 27–39.Google Scholar
  39. Freeman C.; Soete, L., 1997: The Economics of Industrial Innovation (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  40. Garrison, K., 2010: “Perpetuating the Technological Ideology: An Ellulian Critique of Feenberg’s Democratized Rationalization”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 30: 195–204.Google Scholar
  41. Garud, R.; Kumaraswamy, A.; Karnøe, P., 2010: “Path Dependence or Path Creation?”, in: Journal of Management Studies, 47,4: 760–774.Google Scholar
  42. Geels, F.W., 2002: “Technological Transitions as evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case Study”, in: Research Policy, 31: 1257–1274.Google Scholar
  43. Geels, F.W., 2004: From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. Research Policy, 33: 897–920.Google Scholar
  44. Genus, A., 1997: “Unstructuring Incompetence: Problems of Contracting, Trust and the Development of the Channel Tunnel”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 9,4: 419–436.Google Scholar
  45. Genus, A.; Coles, A.-M., 2006: “Firm Strategies for Risk Management in Innovation”, in: International Journal of Innovation Management, 10,2: 1–14.Google Scholar
  46. Genus, A.; Coles, A-M., 2005: “On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17,4: 433–443.Google Scholar
  47. Goudreau, K.A., 2003: “Habermas on Purposive-Rational Action: A Contribution to the Understanding of Ellul’s Technique”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 23: 174–179.Google Scholar
  48. Grundmann, R., 1999: “On Control and Shifting Boundaries: Modern Society in the Web of Systems and Networks,” in: Coutard, O. (Ed.): The Governance of Large Technical Systems (London: Routledge): 239–257.Google Scholar
  49. Harris, L.; Coles, A.-M.; Davies, R., 2003: “Emerging Ethical Perspectives of E-commerce”, in: Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 1,1: 39–48.Google Scholar
  50. Hearn, G.; Roony, B.; Mandeville, T., 2003: “Phenomenological Turbulence in Innovation and Knowledge Systems”, in: Prometheus, 21,2: 231–244.Google Scholar
  51. Hedgecoe, A.; Martin, P., 2003: “The Drugs Don’t Work: Expectations and the Shaping of Pharmacogenetics”, in: Social Studies of Science, 33,3: 327–364.Google Scholar
  52. Hinnells, M., 1993: “Environmental Factors in Products: How to Gather the Evidence”, in: Design Studies, 14(4): 457–475.Google Scholar
  53. Hirsch, P.M.; Gillespie, J., 2001: “Unpacking Path Dependence: Differential Valuations Accorded to History Across Disciplines,” in: Garud, R.; Karnøe, P. (Eds.): Path Dependency and Creation (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum).Google Scholar
  54. Hobday, M., 1998: “Product Complexity, Innovation and Industrial Organization”, in: Research Policy, 26: 698–710.Google Scholar
  55. Hughes, T., 1983: Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  56. Hoffman, P., 2001: Tomorrow’s Energy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  57. Jamison, A., 1998: “The Shaping of the Global Agenda: The Role of Non-governmental Organisations”, in: Lash, S.; Szerszynski, B.; Wynne, B. (Eds.): Risk, Environment and Modernity (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  58. Jamison, A., 2001a: “Science, Technology and the Quest for Sustainable Development”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13,1: 9–22.Google Scholar
  59. Jamison, A., 2001b: The Making of Green Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  60. Kemp, R., 1994: “Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability: The Problem of Technological Regime Shifts”, in: Futures, 26,10: 1023–1046.Google Scholar
  61. Kemp, R.; Rip, A.; Schot, J., 2001: “Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches”, in: Garud, R.; Karnøe, P. (Eds.): Path Dependency and Creation (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum): 269–299.Google Scholar
  62. Kemp, R.; Schot, J.; Hoogma, R., 1998: “Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10: 175–196.Google Scholar
  63. Kline, S.J., 1985: “What is Technology?”, in: Bulletin of Science and Technology, 1: 215–218.Google Scholar
  64. Koch, C., 2000: “The Ventriloquist’s Dummy? The Role of Technology in Political Processes”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12(1): 199–238.Google Scholar
  65. Koch, C., 2001: “Enterprise Resource Planning: Information Technology as a Steamroller for Management Politics?”, in: Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14: 64–78.Google Scholar
  66. Kovalsky, N.; Haluza-DeLay, R., 2011: Homo-Energeticus: An Ellulian Analysis of the Alberta Tar Sands; at: http://www.academia.edu/1216875/Homo_energeticus_Jacques_Ellul_on_the_Alberta_Oilsands (7 May 2013).
  67. Kozinets, R.V., 2008: “Technology/Ideology: How Ideological Fields Influence Consumers’ Technology Narratives”, in: Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6): 865–881.Google Scholar
  68. Kroes, P., 2001: “Technical Functions as Dispositions: A Critical Assessment”, Techne, 5,1: 1–16.Google Scholar
  69. Lampel, J., 2001: “Show and Tell: Product Demonstrations and Path Creation of Technical Change”, in: Garud, R.; Karnøe, P. (Eds.): Path Dependency and Creation (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum): 303–328.Google Scholar
  70. Latour, B., 2000: “When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of Science Studies”, in: British Journal of Sociology, 51,1: 105–123.Google Scholar
  71. Levidow, L., 2001: “Precautionary Uncertainty: Regulating GM Crops in Europe”, in: Social Studies of Science, 31,6: 845–78.Google Scholar
  72. Low, P.; Ward, S. (Eds.) 1998: British Environmental Policy in Europe (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  73. McCormick, J., 2001: Environmental Policy in the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  74. Maley, T., 2004: “Max Weber and the Iron Cage of Technology”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 24: 69–85.Google Scholar
  75. Milanese, B.; Buhrs, T., 2007: “Marrying Strands of Ecological Modernisation: A Proposed Framework”, in: Environmental Politics, 16,4: 565–583.Google Scholar
  76. Milne, R., 2012: “Pharmaceutical Prospects: Bio-pharming and the Geography of Technological Expectations”, in: Social Studies of Science, 42: 290–306.Google Scholar
  77. Mitcham, C., 1994: Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  78. Moore, R.C., 1998: “Hegemony, Agency, and Dialectical Tension in Ellul’s Technological Society”, in: Journal of Communication, Summer: 129–144.Google Scholar
  79. Moore, R.C., 2001: “Environmental Issues and the Watchdog Role of the Media: How Ellul’s Theory Complicates Liberal Democracy”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 32(6): 325–333.Google Scholar
  80. Narayanan, V.K., 2001: Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  81. Nicholls, A.; Opal, C., 2005: Fair Trade: Market Driven Ethical Consumption (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  82. Nowotny, H., 2005: “The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction”, in: Theory Culture and Society, 22: 15–31.Google Scholar
  83. Peters, S.R., Coles, A.-M., 2006: “Strategic Innovation in Sustainable Technology: The Case of Fuel Cells for Vehicles”, in: International Journal for the Environment and Sustainable Development, 5,4: 338–354.Google Scholar
  84. Prabhaker, P., 2000: “Who Owns the Online Consumer?”, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17,2: 158–171.Google Scholar
  85. Roden, D., 2011: In and Out of Control: Self-augmenting and Autonomous Technique; at: http://www.academia.edu/296976/In_and_Out_of_Control_Self-Augmenting_and_Autonomous_Technique (7 May 2013).
  86. Rose, E., 2003: “The Errors of Thamus: An Analysis of Technology Critique,” in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 23: 147–156.Google Scholar
  87. Rycroft, R., 2002: Technology-Based Globalization Indicators: The Centrality of Innovation Network Data. George Washington University Occasional Paper Series, 7 October.Google Scholar
  88. Rydin, Y., 2010: “Planning and the Technological Society: Discussing the London Plan”, in: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34,2: 243–259.Google Scholar
  89. Rosenberg, N., 1983: Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  90. Scott-Ruse, M., 2005: “Technology and the Evolution of the Human: from Bergson to the Philosophy of Technology”, in: Essays in Philosophy, A Biannual Journal, 6,1; at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/eip/vol6/iss1/27 (7 May 2013).
  91. Schot, J., 1992: “The Policy Relevance of the Quasi-Evolutionary Model: The Case of Stimulating Clean Technologies,” in: Coombs, R.; Saviotti, P.; Walsh, V. (Eds.): Technological Change and Company Strategies (London: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  92. Shapere, D., 1998: Building on What we have Learned: the Relations Between Science and Technology”, in: Techne, 4,2: 105–120.Google Scholar
  93. Skea, J., 1994: “Environmental Issues and Innovation,” in: Dodgson, M.; Rothwell, R. (Eds.): The Handbook of Industrial Innovation (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  94. Smith, A., 2003: “Transforming Technological Regimes for Sustainable Development: A Role for Alternative Technology Niches?”, in: Science and Public Policy, 30,2: 127–135.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, A., 2006: “Green Niches in Sustainable Development: The Case of Organic Food”, in: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24: 439–458.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, A.; Kern, F., 2007: The Transitions Discourse in the Ecological Modernisation of the Netherlands. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series 160, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  97. Son, W.C., 2004: “Reading Jacques Ellul’s ‘The Technological Bluff’ in Context”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 24: 518–533.Google Scholar
  98. Summerton, J., 1999: “Power Plays: The Politics of Interlinking Systems”, in: Coutard, O. (Ed.): The Governance of Large Technical Systems (London: Routledge): 93–113.Google Scholar
  99. Thomson, I., 2000: “From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg”, in: Inquiry, 43: 203–216.Google Scholar
  100. Torgerson, D., 2000: “Farewell to the Green Movement? Political Action and the Green Public Sphere”, in: Environmental Politics, 11,1: 133–145.Google Scholar
  101. Tsoi, J.; Steward, F.; Coles, A-M., 2008: “Nanoparticle Innovation and Paper Fibre Recyclability—Mapping Niches as Emergent Socio-technical Networks”, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 16,8/9: 957–966.Google Scholar
  102. Urry, J., 2005: “The Complexities of the Global”, in: Theory Culture and Society, 22: 235–254.Google Scholar
  103. Vanderburg, W.H., 2004: “The Autonomy of Technique Revisited”, in: Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 24: 515–517.Google Scholar
  104. Van der Sluijs, J.; Eijndhoven, J.; Shackley, S.; Wynne, B., 1998: “Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy: The Case of Consensus Around Climate Change”, in: Social Studies of Science, 28,2: 291–323.Google Scholar
  105. Van Lente, H., 2000: “Forceful Futures: From Promise to Requirement”, in: Brown, N.; Rappert, B.; Webster, A. (Eds.): Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science (Aldershot: Ashgate): 43–64.Google Scholar
  106. Wallace, D., 1995: Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation Strategies in Europe, USA and Japan (London: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  107. Winner, L., 1978: Autonomous Technology: Technics Out-Of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  108. Winston, B., 1998: Media, Technology and Society: a History from the Telegraph to the Internet (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s)  2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations