Israeli and US Gangs in the Virtual World: The Sociocultural Context of Gang Members’ Online Activity
- 490 Downloads
The Internet has opened up new opportunities for crime and deviance. Although there is growing interest in gang activity on the web, there is a lack of systematic and comparative evidence about online gang activities. This chapter examines the differences and similarities in online behavior and criminal activity between gang members in the USA and Israel. Drawing on routine activity theory, the study examines the role of online activities (e.g. hours spent online, YouTube use, social network use) and online gang-related activities (e.g., gangs have websites, organize and recruit online, view the web as important) in online offending and deviance. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with 136 current gang members in the USA and 57 gang members in Israel. Findings indicate that there are differences in online activities of gang members and gangs across countries, although levels of offending are largely similar. Furthermore, the analyses reveal that online routines were positively related to online offending of gang members in the USA, while only technological ability was significantly related to offending in Israel. We discuss these findings in the context of existing research on gangs and the web, offer directions for future research, and suggest some response strategies.
KeywordsThe Internet Gangs Routine activities theory Crime and deviance Israel United States
- Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (1997). In Athena’s camp: Preparing for conflict in the information age. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
- Boniel-Nissim, M., & Latzer, Y. (2011). The characteristics of pro-ana community. In D. Stein & Y. Latzer (Eds.), Treatment and special issue of eating disorders (pp. 73–84). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
- Conway, M. (2010). Terrorism and the internet: A review of the history, issues, and responses. In P. Reich (Ed.), Cybercrime and security. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Corb, A. (2011). Into the minds of mayhem: White supremacy, recruitment, and the internet. Cambridge, England: Google Ideas.Google Scholar
- Decker, S. H., & Pyrooz, D. C. (2010). Gang violence around the world: Context, culture and country. In G. McDonald (Ed.), Small arms survey (pp. 128–155). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Decker, S. H., & Pyrooz, D. C. (2012). Gang offending and online behavior. JRSA Forum 30(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
- Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 53–66). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Felson, M. (2006). The street gang strategy. In M. Felson (Ed.), Crime and nature (pp. 305–324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hagedorn, J. (2008). A world of gangs: Armed young men and gangsta culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Harel-Fisch, Y., Korn, I., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Ben- David, I., & Nave, S. (2009). Youth in Israel: Social welfare, mental health, and risk behavior. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University press (Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Horrigan, J. (2010). Broadband adoption and use in America OBI working paper series. Federal Communications Commission. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/FCCSurvey.pdf.
- Hu, Q., Xu, Z., & Yayla, A. A. (2013). Why college students commit computer hacks: Insights from a cross culture analysis. Retrieved from http://beta.orionsshoulders.com/Resources/articles/26_22254_%20().pdf.
- Internet World Stats. (2014). World Internet users and population stats. Retrieved from http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users.
- Interpol. (2014). Cybercrime report. Retrieved from http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Cybercrime/Cybercrime.
- Israel Internet Association. (2014). A survey of internet usage among Israeli youth. Retrieved from http://data.isoc.org.il/data/563.
- Lobe, B., Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., & Vodeb, H. (2011). Cross-national comparison of risks and safety on the Internet. London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline.
- Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and technology. The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/03/13/teens-and-technology-2013.
- Matsuda, K. N., Esbensen, F.-A., & Carson, D. C. (2012). Putting the ‘gang’ in ‘Eurogang’: Characteristics of delinquent youth groups by different definitional approaches. In F.-A. Esbensen & C. L. Maxson (Eds.), Youth gangs in international perspective: Results from the Eurogang program of research (pp. 17–33). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCuddy, T., & Vogel, M. (2014). More than just friends: Online social networks and offending. Criminal Justice Review, 6(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
- Meldrum, R. C., & Clark, J. (2013). Adolescent virtual time spent socializing with peers, substance use, and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 20(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Mesch, G. S. (2009). The internet and youth culture. Hedgehog Review, 11(1), 50–60.Google Scholar
- Pyrooz, D. C., Fox, A. M., Katz, C. M., & Decker, S. H. (2012). Gang organization, offending, and victimization: A cross-national analysis. In F.-A. Esbensen & C. L. Maxson (Eds.), Youth gangs in international perspective: Results from the Eurogang program of research (pp. 85–105). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reid, E., & Chen, H. (2002). Internet-savvy U.S. and middle eastern extremist groups. Mobilization: An International Quarterly Review, 12(2), 177–192.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. (2005). The diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Sela-Shayovitz, R. (2012b). The impact of globalization, migration, and social group processes on neo-Nazi youth gangs. In F.-A. Esbensen & C. L. Maxson (Eds.), Youth gangs in international perspective: Results from the Eurogang program of research (pp. 295–310). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Smith, C. A., & Tobin, K. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2010). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 11(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Van Hellemont, E. (2012). Gangland online: Performing the real world of gangstas and ghettos in Brussels. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 20(1), 159–173.Google Scholar
- Weerman, F., Maxson, C., Esbensen, F.-A., Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & van Gemert, F. (2009). Eurogang program manual. Eurogang Network. Retrieved from http://www.umsl.edu/ccj/eurogang/EurogangManual.pdf.
- Weimann, G. (2004). Www.terror.net : How modern terrorism uses the Internet (Special report 116). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
- Wolfe, S. E., Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2014). Routine cell phone activity and exposure to sex messages: Extending the generality of routine activity theory and exploring the etiology of a risky teenage behavior. Crime & Delinquency. doi: 10.1177/0011128714541192.Google Scholar