Environmental and Microbial Relationships pp 269-278

Part of the The Mycota book series (MYCOTA, volume IV) | Cite as

14 Beetles versus Fungi: Trophic Interactions in Boreal Forests

Chapter

Abstract

Larvae or adults of fungivorous Coleoptera selectively feed on a primarily fungal diet, fruit bodies, mycelia and spores. Evolutionary success and diversity of fungi and beetles make patterns of their co-occurrence and interactions among the most complex in terrestrial habitats. This chapter provides an illustration of this ecological complexity focusing on studies of fungus–beetle interactions from European boreal forests. Taxonomic, functional and life-form diversity of both fungi and beetles clashes in a number of interaction types, resulting in diverse species assemblage patterns and varying degrees of trophic specialisation of beetles.

References

  1. Ashe JS (1986) Subsocial behavior among gyrophaenine Staphylinids (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae). Sociobiology 12:315–320Google Scholar
  2. Benick L (1952) Pilzkäfer und Käferpilze. Ökologische und statistische Untersuchungen. Acta Zool Fenn 70:1–309Google Scholar
  3. Boddy L, Jones TH (2008) Interactions between basidiomycota and invertebrates. In: Boddy L, Frankland JC, van West P (eds) Ecology of saprotrophic basidiomycetes, The British mycological society. Elsevier, London, pp 155–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boddy L, Frankland JC, van West P (eds) (2008) Ecology of saprotrophic basidiomycetes, The British mycological society. Elsevier, London, 372 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnley AK, Collins SA (2007) Entomopathogenic fungi and their role in pest control. In: Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (eds) The mycota, vol 4, Environmental and microbial relationships. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–188Google Scholar
  6. Crowson RA (1981) The biology of Coleoptera. Academic, New York, 802 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodelin B, Pene B, Andre J (2005) L’alimentation des coléoptères saproxyliques et notes sur les contenus stomacaux de cinq espèces. Bull Mens Soc Linn Lyon 74:335–345Google Scholar
  8. Ehnström B, Axelsson R (2002) Insektsgnag i bark och ved. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala, 512 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Faticov M, Ståhls G, Schigel DS (2015) A new trapping method for fungivorous insects. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 88:23–28Google Scholar
  10. Fogel R (1973a) Insect mycophagy: a preliminary bibliography. USDA For Serv 63:1–9Google Scholar
  11. Fogel R (1973b) Insect mycophagy: a preliminary bibliography. USDA For Serv 63A:1–7Google Scholar
  12. Fogel R, Peck SB (1975) Ecological studies of hypogeous fungi 1. Coleoptera associated with sporocarps. Mycologia 67:741–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankland JC (1982) Biomass and nutrient cycling by decomposer basidiomycetes. In: Frankland JC, Hedger JN, Swift MJ (eds) Decomposer basidiomycetes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 241–261Google Scholar
  14. Gilbert J, Arrow FZS (1924) Vocal organs in the coleopterous families Dytiscidae, Erotylidae and Endomychidae. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 72:134–143Google Scholar
  15. Global Biotic Interactions (2015) http://www.globalbioticinteractions.org. Cited 23 July 2015
  16. Guevara R, Rayner AM, Reynols SE (2000a) Effects of fungivory by two specialist ciid beetles (Octotemnus glabriculus and Cis boleti) on the reproductive fitness of their host fungus, coriolus versicolor. New Phytol 145:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guevara R, Rayner AM, Reynols SE (2000b) Orientation of the specialists and generalist fungivorous ciid beetles to host and non-host odours. Physiol Entomol 25:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hågvar S (1999) Saproxylic beetles visiting living sporocarps of Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius. Norw J Entomol 46:25–32Google Scholar
  19. Hammond PM, Lawrence JF (1989) Mycophagy in insects: a summary. In: Wilding HN, Collins NM, Hammond PM (eds) Insect–fungus interactions. Academic, London, pp 275–324Google Scholar
  20. Hanski I (1989) Fungivory: fungi, insects and ecology. In: Wilding HN, Collins NM, Hammond PM (eds) Insect–fungus interactions. Academic, London, pp 25–68Google Scholar
  21. Heard SB (1998) Resource patch density and larval aggregation in mushroom-breeding flies. Oikos 81:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilszczajski J, Gibb H, Hjältén J, Atlegrim O, Johansson T, Pettersson RB, Ball JP, Danell K (2005) Parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) of saproxylic beetles are affected by forest successional stage and dead wood characteristics in boreal spruce forest. Biol Conserv 126:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Interactions Web DataBase (2015) www.nceas.ucsb.edu/interactionweb. Cited 23 July 2015
  24. Jonsell M (1999) Insects in wood-decaying polypores: conservation aspects. Acta Univ Agric Suec Silvestria 93:1–47Google Scholar
  25. Jonsell M, Nordlander G (1995) Field attraction of Coleoptera to odours of the wood-decaying polypores Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius. Ann Zool Fenn 32:391–402Google Scholar
  26. Jonsell M, Nordlander G (2004) Host selection patterns in insects breeding in bracket fungi. Ecol Entomol 29:697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B (1998) Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers Conserv 7:749–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonsson M, Nordlander G (2006) Insect colonisation of fruiting bodies of the wood-decaying fungus Fomitopsis pinicola at different distances from an old-growth forest. Biodivers Conserv 15:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jonsson M, Nordlander G, Jonsell M (1997) Pheromones affecting flying beetles colonizing the polypores Fomes fomentarius and Fomitopsis pinicola. Entomol Fenn 8:161–165Google Scholar
  30. Klimaszewski J, Peck SB (1987) Succession and phenology of beetle faunas (Coleoptera) in the fungus Polyporus squamosus (Huds.: Fr.) Karst. (Polyporaceae) in Silesia, Poland. Can J Zool 65:542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Komonen A (2008) Colonization experiment of fungivorous beetles (Ciidae) in a lake–island system. Entomol Tidskr 129:141–145Google Scholar
  32. Kompantsev AV (1984) Complexes of beetles associated with main wood–decomposing fungi in the forests of Kostroma region. In: Animal world of southern taiga. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 191–196 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  33. Lawrence JF (1973) Host preference in Ciid beetles (Coleoptera: Ciidae) inhabiting the fruiting bodies of Basidiomycetes in North America. Bull Mus Comp Zool 145:163–212Google Scholar
  34. Lawrence JF (1977) Coleoptera associated with an hypoxylon species (Ascomycetes: Xylariaceae) on oak. Coleopt Bull 31:309–312Google Scholar
  35. Lawrence JF (1989) Mycophagy in the Coleoptera: feeding strategies and morphological adaptations. In: Wilding HN, Collins NM, Hammond PM (eds) Insect–fungus interactions. Academic, London, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  36. Leschen RAB (1994) Ecological and behavioral correlates among mycophagous Coleoptera. Folia Entomol Mex 92:9–19Google Scholar
  37. Leschen RAB (2000) Beetles feeding on bugs (Coleoptera, Hemiptera): repeated shifts from mycophagous ancestors. Invertebr Taxon 14:917–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leschen RAB, Carlton CE (1996) Slime–production in mycophagous Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) including a new species of Eusphaerius. J Nat Hist 30:1861–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewinsohn TM, Roslin T (2008) Four ways toward tropical herbivore megadiversity. Ecol Lett 11:398–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewis OT, Memmott J, Lasalle J, Lyal CHC, Whitefoords C, Godfray CJ (2002) Structure of a diverse tropical forest insect–parasitoid community. J Anim Ecol 71:855–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Makarova OL (2004) Gamasid mites (Parasitiformes, Mesostigmata), dwellers of bracket fungi, from the Pechora–Ilychskii reserve (Republic of Komi). Entomol Rev 84:667–672Google Scholar
  42. Martinez ND (1992) Constant connectance in community food webs. Amer Nat 139:1208–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGonigle TP (1995) The significance of grazing on fungi in nutrient cycling. Can J Bot 1:1370–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McGonigle TP (2007) Effect of animals grazing on fungi. In: Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (eds) The mycota, vol 4, Environmental and microbial relationships. Springer, Berlin, pp 201–212Google Scholar
  45. Niemelä T (2005) Käävät, puiden sienet. Polypores, lignicolous fungi. Norrlinia 13:1–320Google Scholar
  46. Økland B (1995) Insect fauna compared between six polypore species in a southern Norwegian spruce forest. Fauna Norv B 42:21–46Google Scholar
  47. Økland B (2002) Canopy cover favours sporocarp-visiting beetles in spruce forests. Norw J Entomol 49:29–39Google Scholar
  48. Orledge GM, Reynolds SE (2005) Fungivore host-use groups from cluster analysis: patterns of utilisation of fungal fruiting bodies by ciid beetles. Ecol Entomol 30:620–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orledge GM, Smith PA, Reynolds SE (2010) The non-pest Australasian fungivore Cis billamellatus Wood (Coleoptera: Ciidae) in northern Europe: spread dynamics, invasion success and ecological impact. Biol Invasions 12:515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paviour-Smith K (1960) The fruiting bodies of macrofungi as habitats for beetles of the family Ciidae (Coleoptera). Oikos 11:43–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Polilov AA (2008) An introduction to the Ptiliidae (Coleoptera) of Primorskiy region with descriptions of three new genera, new and little known species. Russ Entomol J 17:149–176Google Scholar
  52. Polis GA (1991) Complex trophic interactions in deserts: an empirical critique of food-web theory. Am Nat 138:123–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quinto J, Marcos-García M, Díaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V, Galante E, Micó E (2015) Association patterns in saproxylic insect networks in three Iberian Mediterranean woodlands and their resistance to microhabitat loss. PLoS One 10(3):e0122141. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122141
  54. Rohlfs M, Albert M, Keller NP, Kempken F (2007) Secondary chemicals protect mould from fungivory. Biol Lett 3:523–525CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryvarden L (1991) Genera of polypores: Nomenclature and taxonomy. Synop Fungorum 5:1–363Google Scholar
  56. Schigel DS (2009) Polypore assemblages in boreal old-growth forests, and associated Coleoptera. Publ Bot Univ Hels 39:1–44Google Scholar
  57. Schigel DS (2011a) Fungus–beetle food web patterns in boreal forests. Russ Entomol J 20:141–150Google Scholar
  58. Schigel DS (2011b) Polypore–beetle associations in Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 48:319–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schigel DS (2012a) Fungivory of saproxylic Coleoptera: the mystery of rejected polypores. Stud For Slov 137:53–58Google Scholar
  60. Schigel DS (2012b) Fungivory and host associations of Coleoptera: a review of research approaches. Mycology 3:258–272Google Scholar
  61. Schmidt AR, Dörfelt H, Struwe S, Perrichot V (2010) Evidence for fungivory in Cretaceous amber forests from Gondwana and Laurasia. Palaeontographica 283:157–173Google Scholar
  62. Shaw PJA (1992) Fungi, fungivores and fungal food webs. In: Carroll GC, Wicklow D (eds) The fungal community: its organisation and role in ecosystems, vol 2. CRS Press, New York, pp 295–310Google Scholar
  63. Stokland JN, Dahlberg A, Meyke E, Schigel DS, Siitonen J (2006) The Nordic saproxylic database – a comprehensive overview of the biological diversity in dead wood. I European congress of conservation biology, Hungary, 22–26 Aug 2006, p 159Google Scholar
  64. Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (2012) Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 524 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stribling JB, Seymour RL (1988) Evidence of mycophagy in Ptilodactylidae (Coleoptera: Dryopoidea) with notes on phylogenetic implications. Coleopt Bull 42:152–154Google Scholar
  66. Takahashi KH, Tuno N, Kagaya T (2005) Abundance of mycophagous arthropods present on different species of fungi in relation to resource abundance at different spatial scales. Eur J Entomol 102:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thakeow P, Angeli S, Weißbecker B, Schütz S (2008) Antennal and behavioral responses of Cis boleti to fungal odor of Trametes gibbosa. Chem Senses 33:379–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Thunes KH (1994) The coleopteran fauna of Piptoporus betulinus and Fomes fomentarius (Aphyllophorales: Polyporaceae) in western Norway. Entomol Fenn 5:157–168Google Scholar
  69. Thunes KH, Midtgaard F, Gjerde I (2000) Diversity of Coleoptera of the bracket fungus Fomitopsis pinicola in a Norwegian spruce forest. Biodivers Conserv 9:833–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vega FE, Blackwell M (2005) Insect–fungal associations: ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 352 ppGoogle Scholar
  71. Wertheim B, Sevenster JG, Eijs IEM, van Alphen JJM (2000) Species diversity in mycophagous insect community: the case of spatial aggregation vs. resource partitioning. J Anim Ecol 69:335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wheeler Q, Blackwell M (1984) Fungus–insect relationships: perspective in ecology and evolution. Columbia University Press, New York, 514 ppGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilding HN, Collins NM, Hammond PM (1989) Insect–fungus interactions. Academic, London, 344 ppGoogle Scholar
  74. Yakovlev EB (1995) Species diversity and abundance of fungivorous Diptera in forest and city parks of Russia Karelia. Int J Dipterol Res 6:335–362Google Scholar
  75. Yamashita S, Hijii N (2007a) Resource use pattern of a mycophagous beetle, Neopallodes inermis (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae), on soft fungi, Collybia spp. (Agaricales). Ann Entomol Soc Am 100:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yamashita S, Hijii N (2007b) The role of fungal taxa and developmental stage of mushrooms in determining the composition of the mycophagous insect community in a Japanese forest. Eur J Entomol 104:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yamashita S, Ando K, Hoshina H, Ito N, Katayama Y, Kawanabe M, Maruyama M, Itioka T (2015) Food web structure of the fungivorous insect community on bracket fungi in a Bornean tropical rain forest. Ecol Entomol 40:390–400. doi:10.1111/een.12200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yorozuya H (2006) Effects of parasitoids on a mycophagous drosophilid community in northern Japan and an evaluation of the disproportionate parasitism hypothesis. Entomol Sci 9:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metapopulation Research Centre and LUOMUS – Finnish Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of HelsinkiUniversity of Helsinki, HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations