Advertisement

Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture

  • Andrés Díaz Lantada
  • Diego Curras
  • Javier Mousa
  • Stefan Hengsbach
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials book series (SMTEB, volume 18)

Abstract

Even though pioneer studies in the field of tissue engineering, either for disease study or for tissue repair, were performed on flat 2D substrates (normally Petri dishes), more recent research has helped to highlight the relevance of three-dimensional systems in cell culture. In fact, even one-dimensional patterns upon have been found more adequate, for mimicking actual cell migration in three-dimensional environments, than conventional two-dimensional scaffolds for cell culture, what puts forward the need for alternative development procedures aiming at a more adequate reproduction of the 3D environment, taking account of both biochemical and biomechanical approaches. The combined employment of computer-aided design, engineering and manufacturing resources, together with rapid prototyping procedures, working on the basis of additive manufacturing approaches, allows for the efficient development of knowledge-based functionally graded scaffolds for effective and biomimetic three-dimensional cell culture in a wide range of materials. Applications of such tissue engineering scaffolds for cell culture include the repair, regeneration and even biofabrication of hard tissues, soft tissues and osteochondral constructs, as well as the modeling of disease development and management, as detailed in forthcoming chapters. In this chapter we present some design and manufacturing strategies for the development of knowledge-based functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds aimed at different types of tissues. We also detail some prototyping approaches towards low-cost rapid prototyped scaffolds and tumor growth models, as cases of study for illustrating the complete development process of these types of medical devices.

Keywords

Additive Manufacturing Selective Laser Sinter Tissue Engineering Scaffold Manufacturing Resource Direct Laser Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF, http://www.knmf.kit.edu/) a Helmholtz research infrastructure at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Proposal KNMF-2014-011002990 (Multi-culti: Multi-scaffold cell culture platform for addressing the effect of microtexture and microstructure on mesenchymal stem cell fate), and the co-authors and their teams that made them possible are acknowledged. We acknowledge the support of the “Tomax: Tool-less manufacture of complex geometries” project, funded by the European Union Commission under grant nº: 633192—H2020-FoF-2014-2015/H2020-FoF-2014 and led by Prof. Dr. Jürgen Stampfl from the Technical University of Vienna.

References

  1. Bartolo PJS, Almeida H, Laoui T (2009) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing for tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Comput Appl Technol 36:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boccaccini A, Kneser U, Arkudas A (2012) Scaffolds for vascularized bone regeneration: advances and challenges. Expert Rev Med Devices 9(5):457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brem H, Walter K, Langer R (1993) Polymers as controlled drug delivery devices for the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 39:2–7Google Scholar
  4. Chan CKF, Chen CC, Luppen CA, Kraft DL, Kim JB, De Boer A, Wei K, Helms JA, Kuo CJ, Weissman IL (2009) Endochondral ossification is required for hematopoietic stem cell niche formation. Nature 457(7228):490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, Williams MA, Mallick KK (2015) 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng Part C 47:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Díaz Lantada A (2013) Handbook of advanced design and manufacturing technologies for biodevices. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Díaz Lantada A, Endrino JL, Mosquera AA, Lafont P (2010a) Design and rapid prototyping of DLC coated fractal surfaces for tissue engineering applications. J Phys: Conf Ser 252(1):012003Google Scholar
  8. Díaz Lantada A, Mosquera A, Endrino JL, Lafont P (2010b) Design and rapid prototyping of DLC coated fractal surfaces for tissue engineering applications. J Appl Phys Conf Ser 252:012003Google Scholar
  9. Díaz Lantada A, Pareja Sánchez B, Gómez Murillo C, Urbieta Sotillo J (2013) Fractals in tissue engineering: Towards biomimetic cell-culture matrices, microsystems and microstructured implants. Expert Rev Med Devices 10(5):629–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Díaz Lantada A, Alarcón Iniesta E, Pareja Sánchez B, García-Ruíz JP (2014) Free-form rapid-prototyped PDMS scaffolds incorporating growth factors promote chondrogenesis. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014:1–10. Article ID 612976. doi: 10.1155/2014/612976
  11. Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, Yamada K (2009) One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol 184(4):481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekaputra AK, Zhou Y, Cool SMK, Hutmacher DM (2009) Composite electrospun scaffolds for engineering tubular bone grafts. Tissue Eng Part A 15(12):3779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischbach C, Chen R, Matsumoto T, Schmelze T, Brugge JS, Polverini PJ, Mooney DJ (2007) Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds. Nat Methods 4:855–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Kobayashi H (2005) Design of tissue-engineered nanoscaffold through self-assembly of peptide amphiphile. J Bioact Compos Polym 21(4):277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Kobayashi H, Tabata Y (2006) Enhanced angiogenesis through controlled release of basic fibroblast growth factor from peptide amphiphile for tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 27(34):5836–5844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Tian F, Kobayashi H, Tabata Y (2007) Bone regeneration on a collagen sponge self-assembled peptide-amphiphile nanofiber hybrid scaffold. Tissue Eng 13(1):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Hattori S, Matsuoka R, Kawaguchi N (2010) Micro and nano-scale in vitro 3D culture system for cardiac stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 94(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosseinkhani H, Hong P-D, Yu D-S, Chen Y-R, Ickowicz D, Farber I-Y, Domb A-J (2012) Development of 3D in vitro platform technology to engineer mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Nanomed 7:3035–3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutmacher DW, Schantz T, Zein I, Ng KW, Teoh SH, Tan KC (2001) Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res 55(2):203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Infür R, Pucher N, Heller C, Lichtenegger H, Liska R, Schmidt V, Kuna L, Haase A, Stampfl J (2007) Functional polymers by two-photon 3D lithography. Appl Surf Sci 254:836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laschke MW, Rücker M, Jensen G, Carvalho C, Mülhaupt R, Gellrich NC, Menger MD (2008) Incorporation of growth factor containing Matrigel promotes vascularization of porous PLGA scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 85(2):397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindström S, Iles A, Persson J, Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Lindström H, Svahn HA (2010) Nanoporous titania coating of microwell chips for stem cell culture and analysis. J Biomed Sci Eng 5:272–279Google Scholar
  23. Lohfeld S, Tyndyk MA, Cahill S, Flaherty N, Barron V, Mc Hugh PE (2010) A method to fabricate small features on scaffolds for tissue engineering via selective laser sintering. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maher PS, Keatch RP, Donnelly K, Paxton Z (2009) Formed 3D bio-scaffolds via rapid prototyping technology. In: Presented at 4th European conference of the IFMBE, IFMBE proceedings, vol 22, issue 17, p 2200Google Scholar
  25. Ovsianikov A, Mironov V, Stampfl J, Liska R (2012) Engineering 3D cell-culture matrices: multiphoton processing technologies for biological and tissue engineering applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 9(6):613–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perets A, Baruch Y, Weisbuch F, Shoshany G, Neufeld V, Cohen S (2003) Enhancing the vascularization of three-dimensional porous alginate scaffolds by incorporating controlled release basic fibroblast growth factor microspheres. J Biomed Mater Res A 65(4):489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richardson TP, Peters MC, Ennett AB, Mooney DJ (2001) Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery. Nat Biotechnol 19:1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T, Jarzem P, Haglund L (2015) 3D printed ABS and PLA scaffolds for cartilage and nucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 16(7):15118–15135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan GE, Pandit AS, Apatsidis D (2008) Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique. Biomaterials 29:3625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schaedler TA, Jacobsen AJ, Torrents A, Sorensen AE, Lian J, Greer JR, Valdebilt L, Carter WB (2011) Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science 334(6058):962–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuster M, Turecek C, Kaiser B, Stampfl J, Liska R, Varga F (2007a) Evaluation of biocompatible photopolymers I: photoreactivity and mechanical properties of reactive diluents. J Macromol Sci A 44:547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schuster M, Turecek C, Kaiser B, Stampfl J, Liska R, Varga F (2007b) Evaluation of biocompatible photopolymers II: further reactive diluents. Monatsh Chem 138:261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stampfl J, Fouad H, Seidler S, Liska R, Schwanger RF, Woesz A, Fratzl P (2004) Fabrication and moulding of cellular materials by rapid prototyping. Int J Mater Prod Technol 21(4):285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stampfl J, Baudis S, Heller C, Liska R, Neumeister A, Kling R, Ostendorf A, Spitzbart M (2008) Photopolymers with tunable mechanical properties processed by laser-based high-resolution stereolitoraphy. J Micromech Microeng 18:125014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan JY, Chua CK, Leong KF (2010) Indirect fabrication of gelatin scaffolds using rapid prototyping technology. Virtual Phys Prototyping 5(1):45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tan JY, Chua CK, Leong KF (2013) Fabrication of channeled scaffolds with ordered array of micro-pores through microsphere leaching and indirect rapid prototyping technique. Biomed Microdevices 15:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tzezana R, Zussman E, Levenberg SA (2008) Ultra-porous scaffold for tissue engineering, created via a hydrospinning method. Tissue Eng Part C 14(4):281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wald HL, Sarakinos G, Mikos A, Vacanti J, Langer R (1993) Cell seeding in porous transplantation devices. Biomaterials 14:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Warnke PH, Douglas T, Wollny P, Sherry E, Steiner M, Galonska S, Becker ST, Springer IN, Wiltfang J, Sivananthan S (2009) Rapid prototyping: porous titanium alloy scaffolds produced by selective laser melting for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods 15(2):115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whitesides GM, Ostuni E, Takayama S, Jiang X, Ingber DE (2001) Soft-lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3:335–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH (2002) Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:1169–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang M, Boughton P, Rose B, Lee CS, Hong AM (2013) The use of porous scaffolds as tumor models. Int J Biomater ID 396056Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrés Díaz Lantada
    • 1
  • Diego Curras
    • 1
  • Javier Mousa
    • 1
  • Stefan Hengsbach
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department – Product Development LaboratoryUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Institute of Microstructure TechnologyKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyEggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations