Prohibition and the War on Drugs in the Americas: An Analytical Approach

Chapter

Abstract

In the beginning of the twentieth century, a national and international process drove a great amount of psychoactive drugs into illegality. The historical movement towards the criminalization of the production, trade, and use of those drugs is a complex articulation between social practices and security moves made by many states worldwide. In the Americas, it is possible to follow this by studying how moral perspectives connected with emerging technologies of government. This chapter aims to present an analytical framework that addresses the “problematization” and the “securitization” of psychoactive drugs in the Americas, i.e., to show how some drugs became moral, social health, and security “problems” demanding security measures by the states. The proposed framework has five interconnected levels: the moral/social practices level, the public health level, the public security level, the national security level, and the international security level. Our hypothesis is that each one of the American nations that developed internal prohibitionist regimes has faced a singular equilibrium between these five analytical levels. Alongside the general exposition of the framework, we briefly present the historical cases of United States, Brazil, and Mexico in order to indicate how we conceive of what might be possible applications of our analytical suggestions.

References

  1. Aguilar, V. R. & Castañeda, J. (2012). Los saldos del narco: el fracaso de una guerra [The losses of the narco: The failure of a war]. México DF: Punto de Lectura.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez Gómez, C. Landínez, J., Nieto Rojas, J. (2011). Las políticas antidrogas en México y la narcotización de la agenda de seguridad [Antidrug policy in Mexico and the narcotization of the security agenda]. In A. Vargas Velásquez (Ed.), Fuerzas Armadas en la política antidrogas: Bolivia, Colombia y México [Armed Forces in antidrug politics: Bolivia, Colombia, and Mexico] (pp. 243–285). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  3. Álvarez, G. C. (2011). Política Antidrogas de Estados Unidos [The United States antidrug policy]. In A. Vargas Velásquez (Ed.), Fuerzas Armadas en la política antidrogas: Bolivia, Colombia y México [Armed forces in antidrug politics: Bolivia, Colombia, and Mexico] (pp. 265–285). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  4. Aréchiga Córdoba, E. (2005). ‘Dictadura Sanitaria,’ educación y propaganda higiénica en el México Revolucionario, 1917–1934 [“Sanitary dictatorship,” education and hygienic propaganda in revolutionary Mexico, 1917–1934]. Dynamis, 25, 117–143.Google Scholar
  5. Barreira, M., & Botelho, M.L. (2013). O Exército nas ruas: da Operação Rio à ocupação do Complexo do Alemão. Notas para uma reconstituição da exceção urbana [The Army in the streets: From Operation Rio to the occupation of the Complexo do Alemão. Notes for a reconstruction of the urban exception]. In F. Brito & P. R. De Oliveira (Eds.), Até o último homem [To the last man] (pp. 115–128). São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  6. Benítez Manaut, R. (2010). México 2010. Crimen organizado, seguridad nacional y geopolítica [Organized crime, national security and geopolitics]. In R. Benítez Manaut (Ed.), Crimen organizado e Iniciativa Mérida en las relaciones México-Estados Unidos [Organized crime and Merida Initiative in Mexico-United States relations] (pp. 9–30). México, DF: CASEDE.Google Scholar
  7. Bergen-Cico, D. K. (2012). War and drugs: The role of the military conflict in the development of substance abuse. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Books.Google Scholar
  8. Botton Beja, F. (2008). La persecución de chinos en México [The persecution of the Chinese in Mexico]. Estudios de Asia y África, 43(2), 477–486.Google Scholar
  9. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  10. Campos, I. (2010). Degeneration and the origins of Mexico’s war on drugs. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 26(2), 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carneiro, H. (2002). As necessidades humanas e o proibicionismo das drogas no século XX [Human needs and drug prohibition in the twentieth century]. Outubro, 6, 115–128.Google Scholar
  12. Código Penal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos [Penal code of the United Mexican States] (1931). México, DF.Google Scholar
  13. Da Silva, M. (2010). Polícia de Costumes, Drogas e Educação na Capital Federal nos anos 1920–30 [Vice police, drugs, and education in the federal capital in the years 1920–30]. Telas, 11(23), 3–22.Google Scholar
  14. Escohotado, A. (1996). Historia elemental de las drogas [Elementary history of drugs]. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (2000). The birth of social medicine. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France (1975–1976). New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2008a). The history of sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (2008b). The Birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France (1978–1979). New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France (1977–1978). New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  21. Garcia, M.L.T., Leal, F., Abreu, C. (2008). A Política Antidrogas Brasileira: velhos dilemas [The Brazilian antidrug policy: Old dilemmas]. Psicologia & Sociedade, 20(2), 267–276.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, S. (2010). Cities under siege: The new military urbanism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Hargraves, C. (1992). Snow fields: The war on cocaine in the Andes. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
  24. Herschinger, E. (2011). Constructing global enemies: Hegemony and identity in international discourses on terrorism and drug prohibition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Herz, M. (2006). Brazil, Andean security, and U.S. regional security policy. In B. Loveman (Ed.), Addicted to failure (pp. 197–223). Plymouth, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Isacson, A. (2005). Las Fuerzas Armadas de Estados Unidos en la ‘guerra contra las drogas’ [The United States Armed Forces in the “war on drugs”]. In C. A. Youngers & E. Rosin (Eds.), Drogas y democracia en América Latina: el impacto de la política de Estados Unidos [Drugs and democracy in Latin America: The impact of the United States’ policy] (pp. 29–84). Buenos Aires: Biblos.Google Scholar
  27. Jay, M. (2012). High society: Mind-altering drugs in history and culture. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  28. Labate, B. C., & Cavnar, C. (Eds.). (2014). Prohibition, religious freedom, and human rights: Regulating traditional drug use. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Labate, B.C., & Rodrigues, T. (Eds.). (2015). Drogas, política y sociedad en América Latina y el Caribe [Drugs, politics and society in Latin America and the Caribbean]. México: CIDE.Google Scholar
  30. Labate, B.C., & Rodrigues. (2015b). Políticas de drogas en México: Entre el narco, la represión y las alternativas [Drug policies in Mexico: Between narco, repression and the alternatives] [manuscript]. Aguascalientes: CIDE Región Centro.Google Scholar
  31. Labate, B.C., Goulart, S.L., Fiore, M., MacRae, E, Carneiro, H. (Eds.). (2008). Drogas e Cultura: Novas Perspectivas [Drugs and culture: New perspectives]. Salvador: Edufba.Google Scholar
  32. Labrousse, A. (1996). The geopolitics of drugs. Paris: OGD.Google Scholar
  33. Langton, J. (2013). Gangland: The rise of the Mexican drug cartels from El Paso to Vancouver. Toronto: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  34. Marcy, W. (2010). The politics of cocaine: How the U.S. foreign policy has created a thriving drug industry in Central and South America. Chicago: Lawrence Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Mcallister, W. (2000). Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century: An international history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Mcallister, W. (2012). Governing the global drug wars. London: LSE.Google Scholar
  37. Neocleous, M. (2011). Inhuman security. In D. Chandler & N. Hynek (Eds.), Critical perspectives on human security: Rethinking emancipation and power in international relations (pp. 186–197). New York: PRIOR/Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Nixon, R. (1971). Special message to the Congress on drug abuse prevention and control. The American Presidency Project. Retrieved January 18, 2015 from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=3048.
  39. Ojeda, O. (1974). Toxicomanía y narcotráfico [Drug abuse and drug trafficking]. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  40. Passetti, E. (1991). Das “fumeries” ao narcotráfico [From the “opium fumeries” to drug trafficking]. São Paulo: Educ.Google Scholar
  41. Provine, D. M. (2007). Unequal under law: Race in the war on drugs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reiss, S. (2014). We sell drugs: The alchemy of US empire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Robey, J. (2000). A war on drugs or a war on minorities? In S. Nagel (Ed.), Handbook of global legal policy (pp. 415–428). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  44. Rodrigues, T. (2012). Narcotráfico, uma guerra na guerra [Drug trafficking: A war within a war]. São Paulo: Desatino.Google Scholar
  45. Rodrigues, T. (2014). Quem é o inimigo? [Who is the enemy?] Revista de História da Biblioteca Nacional, Year 10(110), 38–41.Google Scholar
  46. Rodrigues, T. (2015). Política e drogas nas Américas: uma genealogia do Proibicionismo [Politics and drugs in the Americas: A genealogy of Prohibitionism]. São Paulo: Desatino.Google Scholar
  47. Rodrigues, T. (2012b). Drug-trafficking and militarization in the Americas: An addiction to war. Contexto Internacional, 34, 9–41.Google Scholar
  48. Rodrigues, T. (2013). Drug-trafficking and militarization of public safety in Mexico and Brazil: Comparative perspectives. San Francisco: ISA Proceedings.Google Scholar
  49. Rodrigues, T., & Labate, B. C. Brazilian drug policy: Tension between repression and alternatives, in this volume.Google Scholar
  50. Rodríguez Luna, A. (2010). La Iniciativa Mérida y la lucha contra las drogas. Pasado y presente [The Merida Initiative and the fight against drugs: Past and present]. In R. Benítez Manaut (Ed.), Crimen organizado e Iniciativa Mérida en las relaciones México-Estados Unidos [Organized crime and Merida Initiative in Mexico-United States relations] (pp. 31–68). México, DF: CASEDE.Google Scholar
  51. Rosen, G. (1994). Uma história da saúde pública [A history of public health]. São Paulo: Editora da Unesp.Google Scholar
  52. Santos, M. (2007). O poder norte-americano e a América Latina no Pós-Guerra Fria [The power of the US and Latin America in the post-Cold War]. São Paulo: Annablume/FAPESP.Google Scholar
  53. Saviano, R. (2014). Zero, zero, zero. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  54. Serra, C. A., & Rodrigues, T. (2014). Estado de Direito e Punição: a lógica da guerra no Rio de Janeiro. Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento, 35(126), 91–108.Google Scholar
  55. Serra, C.A., & Zaccone, O. (2012). Guerra é paz: os paradoxos da política de segurança de confronto humanitário [War is peace: The paradoxes of confrontational humanitarian security policy] (pp. 23–46). In V. M. Batista (Ed.), Paz armada [Armed peace]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan/Instituto Carioca de Criminologia.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, B.T., Public drug policy and grey zone pacts in Mexico, 1920–1980, in this volume.Google Scholar
  57. Souza, A. & Herz, M. (2015). Drug moms, drug warriors: Gender performances and the production of (in)security in the discursive construction of the “war on drugs” toward Latin America (Master’s thesis). Rio de Janeiro: Institute of International Relations, Pontifical Catholic University.Google Scholar
  58. Szasz, T. (1992). Our right on drugs: The case for free market. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  59. Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Strategic Studies (INEST), Fluminense Federal University (UFF)NiteróiBrazil
  2. 2.CIESAS OccidenteGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations