Brazilian Drug Policy: Tension Between Repression and Alternatives

Chapter

Abstract

Policies toward illicit drugs have attained the utmost relevance in the debate pervading all levels of Brazilian society. Propositions for relaxation of traditional, coercive legislation share the landscape with others aimed at maintaining and deepening prohibitionism and its corollaries. This chapter describes the narratives produced in the history of Brazil’s prohibitionism, from the beginning of the twentieth century until the current times, and its unfolding juridical backdrop. Among other possible repercussions, Brazil’s domestic politics and its connections with international prohibitionism, inclusive of the War on Drugs, are presented, as are the political associations, progressive and conservative, that are currently at play there. The paradoxes and tensions that currently pervade Brazil’s policies toward the drug issue are underscored. These policies oscillate between blunt, military support for the War on Drugs, the moral persecution of users and addicts, and support for controversial treatment campaigns, to reformist propositions like those carried out in other Latin American countries with the support of social movements, such as the proposal to regulate the medicinal or recreational use of cannabis. The authors wrap up the chapter by addressing the different political traditions and moral views that inform these opposing views, and try to understand the wider implications of contemporary changes to Prohibition at a global scale.

References

  1. Arias, E. D. (2006). Drugs and democracy in Rio de Janeiro: Trafficking, social networks and public security. Raleigh, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barros, M., & Botelho, M. (2013). O Exército nas ruas: da Operação Rio à ocupação do Alemão. Notas para uma reconstituição da exceção urbana [The army on the streets: From Operation Rio to the occupation of the Alemão slum. Notes for a reconstitution of the exception]. In F. Brito & P. R. Oliveira (Orgs.), Até o último homem [To the last man] (pp. 115–128). São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  3. Bastos, F. I., & Berloni, N. (2014). Pesquisa Nacional sobre o uso de crack: quem são os usuários de crack e/ou similares do Brasil? Quantos são nas capitais brasileiras? [National survey on the use of crack: Who are the Brazilian users of crack and/or similar drugs? How many are there in the Brazilian State capitals?]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora ICICT/FIOCRUZ.Google Scholar
  4. Batista, V. M. (2012). O Alemão é muito mais complexo [The AlemÐo slums are much more complex]. In V. M. Batista (Ed.), Paz Armada [Armed peace]. Rio de Janeiro: ICC/Revan.Google Scholar
  5. Boiteux, L. (2015). Contradicciones y ambigüedades en la Política de Drogas Brasileña del siglo XXI: Avances y retrocesos [Contradictions and ambiguities in the twenty-first century Brazilian drug policy: Progress and setbacks]. In B. C. Labate & T. Rodrigues (Eds.), Drogas, política y sociedad en América Latina y el Caribe [Drugs, politics and society in Latin America and the Caribbean]. México, DF: CIDE.Google Scholar
  6. Boiteux, L. & Pádua, J. P. (2012). A desproporcionalidade da Lei de Drogas: os custos humanos e econômico da atual política no Brasil [The disproportionality of the drug law: The human and economic costs of current policy in Brazil]. Retrieved September 29, 2015 from http://www.wola.org/sites/default/files/Drug%20Policy/Artigo%20desproporcionalidade%20Brasil_rev.pdf.
  7. Boiteux, L. (Ed.). (2009). Tráfico E Constituição [Drug trafficking and the Constitution]. Brasília: Ministério Da Justiça.Google Scholar
  8. Boiteux, L., & Pádua, J. P. (2014). Respuestas Estatales al consumidor de drogas ilícitas en Brasil: un análisis crítico de las políticas públicas (penales y civiles) para los consumidores [State responses to the consumer of illicit drugs in Brazil: A critical analysis of public policies (criminal and civil) for consumers]. In C. Perez Correa (Coord.), Consumo, consumidores y las respuestas estatales en América Latina [Consumption, consumers and state responses in Latin America] (pp. 117–148). Mexico, DF: Fontamara.Google Scholar
  9. Brito, F. (2013). Considerações sobre a regulação armada dos territórios cariocas [On the armed regulation of Rio de Janeiro’s territories]. In F. Brito, & P. R. Oliveira (Orgs.), Até o último homem [To the last man] (pp. 79–114). São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  10. Cabeleira, M. (2015). Modulação pacificadora da polícia nas favelas cariocas [The pacifying modulation of police in the slums of Rio]. Verve, 27, 69–88.Google Scholar
  11. Carneiro, B. (1993). A vertigem dos venenos elegantes [The vertigo of elegant poisons]. São Paulo: PUC-SP.Google Scholar
  12. Carvalho, I., & Pellegrino, A. P. (2015). Política de drogas no Brasil: A mudança já começou [Drug policy in Brazil: The change has begun]. Brasília: Instituto Igarapé.Google Scholar
  13. Carvalho, S. de (2015). A política criminal de drogas no Brasil: Um estudo [Criminal policy in Brazil: A study]. São Paulo: Saraiva.Google Scholar
  14. Delmanto, J. (2013). Camaradas Caretas: Drogas e esquerdas no Brasil após 1961 [Square Comrades: drugs and leftists in Brazil since 1961]. MsC Thesis in Social Sciences. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
  15. Dias, A. C. (2012). Crack: Reflexões para abordar e enfrentar o problema [Crack: Reflections to address and tackle the problem]. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (2008a). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France (1978–1979). New York: Picador/Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2007). Society must be defended: Lectures at Collège de France (1975–1976). New York: Picador/Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2008b). The history of sexuality, vol. 1: An introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  19. França, J. M. C. (2015). História da maconha no Brasil [The history of marijuana in Brazil]. São Paulo: Três Estrelas.Google Scholar
  20. Gomes, M. (2014). A ‘pacificação’ como prática de ‘política externa’ de (re)produção do self estatal: Reescrevendo o engajamento brasileiro na Missão das Nações Unidas para a Estabilização do Haiti (MINUSTAH) [“Pacification” as practice of the “foreign policy” of (re) production of the self: Rewriting the Brazilian State engagement in the United Nations mission for the stabilization of Haiti (MINUSTAH)] (Doctoral dissertation). IRI-PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  21. Karam, M. L. (2008). A Lei 11.343/2006 e os repetidos danos do proibicionismo [Law 11,343 /2006 and the repeated damage of prohibition]. In B. C. Labate, S. L. Goulart, M. Fiore, E. MacRae, & H. Carneiro (Eds.), Drogas e cultura: Novas perspectivas [Drugs and culture: New perspectives] (pp. 105–120). Salvador: Edufba.Google Scholar
  22. Labate, B. C., Goulart, S. L., Fiore, M., MacRae, E. & Carneiro, H. (Eds.) (2008). Drogas e Cultura: Novas Perspectivas [Drugs and culture: New perspectives]. Salvador, Brazil: Edufba.Google Scholar
  23. Labate, B. C., & Feeney, K. (2012). Ayahuasca and the process of regulation in Brazil and internationally: Implications and challenges. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23(2), 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacRae, E. (2010). The development of Brazilian public policies on the religious use of ayahuasca. In B. C. Labate & E. MacRae (Eds.), Ayahuasca, ritual and region in Brazil (pp. 191–204). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  25. Mcallister, W. (2000). Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century: An international history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Passetti, E. (1991). Das ‘fumeries’ ao narcotráfico [From the “opium fumeries” to drug-trafficking]. São Paulo: Educ.Google Scholar
  27. Pinto, N. M., & Oberling, A. F. (2016). Liberação ou Proibição? Discursos e Representações acerca da política de drogas nos projetos de leis no Congresso Nacional (2010–2014) [Release or ban? Discourses and representations about the drug policy in bills in Congress (2010–2014)]. In B. C. Labate, F. Policarpo, S. L. Goulart, & P. O. Rosa (Orgs.), Drogas, políticas públicas e consumidores [Drugs, public policy and consumers]. Campinas, Brazil: Mercado de Letras/São Paulo: Núcleo de Estudos Interdisciplinares sobre Psicoativos (NEIP).Google Scholar
  28. Prado, D. N. (2013). Crítica ao Controle Penal das Drogas Ilícitas. [Critique of criminal control of illicit drugs]. Salvador, Brazil: Faculdade Baiana de Direito/Juspodium.Google Scholar
  29. “Programas de Braços Abertos” completa um ano com diminuição do fluxo de usuários e da criminalidade na região [Program “with open arms” completes a year with decreasing flow of users and criminality in the region]. (2015, January 16). Prefeitura de São Paulo. Retrieved September 29, 2015 from http://www.capital.sp.gov.br/.
  30. Ramus, G. (2015). Proibicionismo e a gestão da infelicidade: uma experiência com penas alternativas [Prohibition and the management of misery: An experiment with alternative sentences]. Verve, 27, 56–68.Google Scholar
  31. Ribeiro, M. (2013). Drogas e Redução de Danos: o direito das pessoas que usam drogas. [Drugs and harm reduction: The rights of people who use drugs]. São Paulo, Brazil: Saraiva.Google Scholar
  32. Rodrigues, T. (2012). Narcotráfico: Uma guerra na guerra [Drug trafficking: A war on war] (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Desatino.Google Scholar
  33. Rodrigues, T. (2012b). Drug-trafficking and militarization in the Americas: Addiction to war. Contexto Internacional, 34, 9–38.Google Scholar
  34. Rodrigues, T. (2013). Drug-Trafficking and militarization of public safety in Mexico and Brazil: Comparative perspectives. ISA Annual Conference Proceedings, Toronto.Google Scholar
  35. Rodrigues, T. (2014). Quem é o inimigo? [Who is the enemy?]. Revista de História da Biblioteca Nacional, 110, 38–41.Google Scholar
  36. Rodrigues, T. (2015). Política e drogas nas Américas: uma genealogia do proibicionismo [Politics and drugs in the Americas: a geneology of drug prohibition]. São Paulo: Desatino.Google Scholar
  37. Rodrigues, T., & Labate, B. C. Prohibition and the War on Drugs in the Americas: An analytical approach, in this volume.Google Scholar
  38. Rodrigues, T., & Serra, C. H. (2014). Estado de Direito e Punição: A lógica da guerra no Rio de Janeiro [Rule of law and punishment: The logic of war in Rio de Janeiro]. Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento, 35(126), 91–108.Google Scholar
  39. Rolles, S. From drug war to policy reform: Implications of US drug strategy for Latin America, in this volume.Google Scholar
  40. Serra, C. A., & Zaccone, O. (2012). Guerra é paz: os paradoxos da política de segurança de confronto humanitário [War is peace: The paradoxes of confrontational humanitarian security policy]. In V. M. Batista & V. Malaguti (Orgs.), Paz armada [Armed peace] (pp. 23–46). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan/Instituto Carioca de Criminologia.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, B. T. Public drug policy and grey zone pacts in Mexico, 1920–1980, in this volume.Google Scholar
  42. Souza, M.L. (2015). A ‘reconquista do território’, ou: um novo capítulo na militarização da questão urbana [The ‘territory reconquest’ or: a new chapter of the militarization of the urban issue]. In Dos espaços de controle aos territórios dissidentes [From the spaces of control to the dissident territories]. Rio de Janeiro: Consequência.Google Scholar
  43. Szasz, T. (1992). Our right on drugs: The case for free market. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations. (2014). World drug report 2014. Vienna: UNODC.Google Scholar
  45. Wacquant, L. (2001). As prisões da miséria [Prisions of Poverty]. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.Google Scholar
  46. Zaccone, O. (2015) Indignos de vida: A forma jurídica da política de extermínio de inimigos na cidade do Rio de Janeiro [Unworthy of life: The legal form of the policy of extermination of enemies in the city of Rio de Janeiro]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan.Google Scholar
  47. Zaccone, O. (2010). Acionistas do nada: Quem são os traficantes de drogas [Shareholders of nowhere: Who are the drug traffickers]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Strategic Studies (INEST), Fluminense Federal University (UFF)NiteróiBrazil
  2. 2.CIESAS OccidenteGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations