The Distance-Based Representative Skyline Calculation Using Unsupervised Extreme Learning Machines

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization book series (PALO, volume 6)

Abstract

A representative skyline contains k skyline points that can represent its full skyline, which is very useful in the multiple criteria decision making problems. In this paper, we focus on the distance-based representative skyline (k-DRS) query which can describe the tradeoffs among different dimensions offered by the full skyline. Since k-DRS is a NP-hard problem in d-dimensional (\(d\ge 3\)) space, it is impossible to calculate the exact k-DRS in d-dimensional space. By in-depth analyzing the properties of the k-DRS, we propose a new perspective to solve this problem and a k distance-based representative skyline algorithm based on US-ELM (DRSELM) is presented. In DRSELM, first we apply US-ELM to divide the full skyline set into k clusters. Second, in each cluster, we design a method to select a point as the representative point. Experimental results show that our DRSELM significantly outperforms its competitors in terms of both accuracy and efficiency.

Keywords

Skyline k representative skyline k-DRS US-ELM 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61472069, 61402089, 61100022 and 61173029; the National High Technology Research and Development Plan (863 Plan) under Grant No. 2012AA011004; and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No. N130404014.

References

  1. 1.
    Stephan, B.: Donald Kossmann, Konrad Stocker: The Skyline Operator. ICDE, pp. 421–430 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tao, Y., Ding, L., Lin, X., Pei, J.: Distance-Based Representative Skyline. ICDE, pp. 892–903 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang, G., Zhu, Q., Siew, C.-K.: Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. Proc. Int. Jt. Conf. Neural Netw. 2, 985–990 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, G., Zhu, Q., Siew, C.-K.: Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70, 489–501 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, G.: What are extreme learning machines? Filling the gap between Frank Rosenblatt’s Dream and John von Neumann’s Puzzle. Cogn. Comput. 7(3), 263–278 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cherkassky, Vladimir: The nature of statistical learning theory. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 8(6), 1564 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi, L., Baoliang, L.: EEG-based vigilance estimation using extreme learning machines. Neurocomputing 102, 135–143 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang, G., Zhou, H., Ding, X., Zhang, R.: Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 42(2), 513–529 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rong, H., Huang, G., Sundararajan, N., Saratchandran, P.: Online sequential fuzzy extreme learning machine for function approximation and classification problems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 39(4), 1067–1072 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao, J., Wang, Z.: Dong Sun Park: online sequential extreme learning machine with forgetting mechanism. Neurocomputing 87, 79–89 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liang, N., Huang, G., Saratchandran, P., Sundararajan, N.: A fast and accurate online sequential learning algorithm for feedforward networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 17(6), 1411–1423 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He, Q., Changying, D., Wang, Q., Zhuang, F., Shi, Z.: A parallel incremental extreme SVM classifier. Neurocomputing 74(16), 2532–2540 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, G., Song, S., Gupta, J.N.D., Wu, C.: Semi-Supervised and unsupervised extreme learning machines. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44(12), 2405–2417 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanungo, T., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Piatko, C.D., Silverman, R., Wu, A.Y.: An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(7), 881–892 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belkin, M., Niyogi, P.: Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Comput. 15(6), 1373–1396 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I., Weiss, Y.: On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 2, 849C856 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bengio, Y.: Learning deep architectures for AI. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2(1), 1–127 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Serre, D.: TMatrices: Theory and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chomicki, J., Godfrey, P., Gryz, J., Liang, D.: Skyline with presorting. ICDE 717–719 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kossmann, D., Ramsak, F., Rost, S.: Shooting stars in the sky: an online algorithm for skyline queries. VLDB 275–286 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papadias, D., Tao, Y., Fu, G., Seeger, B.: An optimal and progressive algorithm for skyline queries. SIGMOD Conference 467–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, B., Chan, C.-Y.: ZINC: efficient indexing for skyline computation. PVLDB, 4(3), 197–207 (2020)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pei, J., Jin, W., Ester, M., Tao, Y.: Catching the best views of skyline: a semantic approach based on decisive subspaces. VLDB 253–264 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin, X., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y.: Selecting stars: the \(k\) most representative skyline operator. ICDE 86–95 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information Science & EngineeringNortheastern UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations