Biomimetics pp 327-382 | Cite as

Shark-Skin Surface for Fluid-Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering book series (BIOMEDICAL)

Abstract

Nature has created ways of reducing drag in fluid flow, evident in the efficient movement of fish, dolphins, and sharks. The mucus secreted by fish reduces drag as they move through water, protects the fish from abrasion by making the fish slide across objects rather than scrape, and prevents disease by making the surface of the fish difficult for microscopic organisms to adhere to, minimizing biofouling (Shephard in Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 4:401–429, 1994).

Keywords

Drag Reduction Viscous Sublayer Closed Channel Fluid Drag Shark Skin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, J.D. (2010), Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th Ed., McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1952), Marine Fouling and its Prevention, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, US Naval Institute, Annapolis, US.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2007), Pilot’s Encyclopedia of Aeronautical Knowledge, United States Federal Aviation Administration, Skyhorse, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous (2015) ANSYS® Fluent, Release 14.5, Help System, Fluent User’s Guide, ANSYS, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.H., and Pope, A. (1999), Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Batchelor, G.K. (1970), An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Bechert, D.W., Hoppe, G. and Reif, W.E. (1985), “On the Drag Reduction of the Shark Skin,” Paper # AIAA-85-0546, presented at AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, Boulder, CO, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Bechert, D.W., Bartenwerfer, M., Hoppe, G., and Reif, W.-E. (1986), “Drag Reduction Mechanisms Derived from Shark Skin,” Paper # ICAS-86-1.8.3, Vol. 2 (A86-48-97624-01), pp. 1044-1068, Proc. 15 th ICAS Congress, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bechert, D.W., Hoppe, G., van der Hoeven, J.G.T. and Makris, R. (1992), “The Berlin Oil Channel for Drag Reduction Research,” Exp. in Fluids 12, 251-260.Google Scholar
  10. Bechert, D.W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., and Meyer, R. (1997a), “Biological Surfaces and Their Technological Application – Laboratory and Flight Experiments on Drag Reduction and Separation Control,” Paper # AIAA-1997-1960, presented at AIAA 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bechert, D.W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., van der Hoeven, J. G. T. and Hoppe, G. (1997b), “Experiments on Drag Reducing Surfaces and their Optimization with an Adjustable Geometry,” J. Fluid Mech. 338, 59-87.Google Scholar
  12. Bechert, D.W., Bruse, M. and Hage, W. (2000a), “Experiments with Three-dimensional Riblets as an Idealized Model of Shark Skin,” Exp. Fluids 28, 403-412.Google Scholar
  13. Bechert, D.W., Bruse, M., Hage, W. and Meyer, R. (2000b), “Fluid Mechanics of Biological Surfaces and their Technological Application,” Naturwissenschaften 87, 157-171.Google Scholar
  14. Bhushan, B. (2009), “Biomimetics: Lessons from Nature – an Overview,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 367, 1445-1486.Google Scholar
  15. Bhushan, B. (2012), “Bioinspired Structured Surfaces,” Langmuir 28, 1698-1714.Google Scholar
  16. Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y.C. (2011), “Natural and Biomimetic Artificial Surfaces for Superhydrophobicity, Self-Cleaning, Low Adhesion, and Drag Reduction,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 1-108.Google Scholar
  17. Bixler, G.D. and Bhushan, B. (2012a), “Biofouling Lessons from Nature,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370, 2381-2417.Google Scholar
  18. Bixler, G.D. and Bhushan, B. (2012b), “‘Bioinspired Rice Leaf and Butterfly Wing Surface Structures Combining Shark Skin and Lotus Effects,” Soft Matter 8, 11271-11284.Google Scholar
  19. Bixler, G.D. and Bhushan, B. (2013a), “Fluid Drag Reduction with Shark-skin Riblet Inspired Microstructured Surfaces,” Adv. Func. Mater. 23, 4507-4528.Google Scholar
  20. Bixler, G.D. and Bhushan, B. (2013b), “Shark Skin Inspired Low-drag Microstructured Surfaces in Closed Channel Flow,” J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 393, 384-396.Google Scholar
  21. Bixler, G.D. and Bhushan, B. (2013c), “Bioinspired Micro/Nanostructured Surfaces for Oil Drag Reduction in Closed Channel Flow,” Soft Matter 9, 1620-1635.Google Scholar
  22. Bixler, G.D. and Bhushan, B. (2013d), “Fluid Drag Reduction and Efficient Self-Cleaning with Rice Leaf and Butterfly Wing Bioinspired Surfaces,” Nanoscale 5, 7685-7710.Google Scholar
  23. Blevins, R.D. (1984), Applied Fluid Dynamics Handbook, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Brennan, A.B., Baney, R.H., Carman, M.I., Estes, T.G., Feinberg, A.W., Wilson, L.H. and Schumacher, J.F.. (2010), “Surface Topographies for Non-Toxic Bioadhesion Control,” United States Patent no. 7 650 848.Google Scholar
  25. Brostow, W. (2008), “Drag Reduction in Flow: Review of Applications, Mechanism, and Prediction,” J. Indust and Eng Chem 14, 408-416.Google Scholar
  26. Burger, E.D., Munk, W.R. and Wahl, H.A. (1982), “Flow Increase in the Trans Alaska Pipeline Through Use of a Polymeric Drag-Reducing Additive,” J. Petro Tech, 34, 377-386.Google Scholar
  27. Buttner, C.C. and Schulz, U. (2011), “Shark Skin Inspired Riblet Structures as Aerodynamically Optimized High Temperature Coatings for Blades of Aeroengines,” Smart Matl. and Struct. 20, 1-9.Google Scholar
  28. Caram, J.M. and Ahmed, A. (1991), “Effect of Riblets on Turbulence in the Wake of an Airfoil,” AIAA 29 (11), 1769-1770.Google Scholar
  29. Caram, J.M. and Ahmed, A. (1992), “Development of the Wake of an Airfoil with Riblets,” AIAA 30 (12), 2817-2818.Google Scholar
  30. Chan, J. and Wong, S. (eds.) (2010), Biofouling Types, Impact and Anti-Fouling, Nova Science Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Choi, K.S., Gadd, G.E., Pearcey, H.H., Savill, A.M., and Svensson, S. (1989), “Tests of Drag-Reducing Polymer Coated on a Riblet Surface,” Appl. Sci. Res. 46, 209-216.Google Scholar
  32. Choi, H., Moin, P. and Kim, J. (1993), “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over Riblets,” J. Fluid Mech. 255, 503–539.Google Scholar
  33. Choi, K.S., Yang, X., Clayton, B.R., Glover, E.J., Altar, M., Semenov, B.N., and Kulik, V.M. (1997), “Turbulent Drag Reduction Using Compliant Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc A 453, 2229-2240.Google Scholar
  34. Chu, D. C. and Karniadakis, G. E. (1993), “A Direct Numerical Simulation of Laminar and Turbulent Flow Over Riblet-mounted Surfaces,” J. Fluid Mech. 250, 1–42.Google Scholar
  35. Collins, M.W. and Brebbia, C.A. (eds.) (2004), Design and Nature II Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, WIT Press, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  36. Copisarow, M. (1945), “Marine Fouling and its Prevention,” Science 101, 406-407.Google Scholar
  37. Coustols, E. (1989), “Behavior of Internal Manipulators: “Riblet” Models in Subsonic and Transonic Flows,” Paper # AIAA-89-0963, presented at AIAA Shear Flow Conference, Tempe, AZ, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Coustols, E. and Cousteix, J. (1994), “Performances of Riblets in the Supersonic Regime,” AIAA 32 (2), 431-433.Google Scholar
  39. Coustols, E. and Schmitt, V. (1990), “Synthesis of Experimental Riblet Studies in Transonic Conditions,” in Turbulence Control by Passive Means (eds. Coustols, Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 123-140, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  40. Daniello, R.J., Waterhouse, N.E. and Rothstein, J.P. (2009), “Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flows over Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Phys. Fluids 21, 085103.Google Scholar
  41. Davies, M. (ed.) (2002), Standard Handbook for Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Dean, B. and Bhushan, B. (2010), “Shark-skin Surfaces for Fluid-Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow: a Review,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 368, 4775-4806.Google Scholar
  43. Dean, B. and Bhushan, B. (2012), “The Effect of Riblets in Rectangular Duct Flow,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 3936-3947.Google Scholar
  44. Denkena, B., Kohler, J. and Wang, B. (2010), “Manufacturing of Functional Riblet Structures by Profile Grinding,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Tech. 3, 14-26.Google Scholar
  45. Deyuan, Z., Yuehao, L., Huawei, C. and Xinggang, J. (2011), “Exploring Drag-Reducing Grooved Internal Coating for Gas Pipelines,” Pipeline & Gas Journal March, 59-60.Google Scholar
  46. Dickinson, P.H. and Proudley, G.M. (1991), “Methods of Manufacture and Surface Treatment Using Laser Radiation,” United States Patent no. 4 994 639.Google Scholar
  47. El-Samni, O. A., Chun, H. H. and Yoon, H. S. (2007), “Drag Reduction of Turbulent Flow Over Thin Rectangular Riblets,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. 45, 436-454.Google Scholar
  48. Enyutin, G.V., Lashkov, Y.A., and Samoilova, N.V. (1995), “Drag Reduction in Riblet-Lined Pipes,” Fluid Dynamics, 30 (1), 45-48.Google Scholar
  49. Frings, B. (1988), “Heterogeneous Drag Reduction in Turbulent Pipe Flows using Various Injection Techniques,” Rheologica Acta 27, 92-110.Google Scholar
  50. Gillcrist, M. C. and Reidy, L. W. (1989), “Drag Measurements on Marine Vehicles with a Riblet Surface Coating,” in Drag Reduction in Fluid Flows (Sellin, R. and Moses, R., eds.), pp. 99-106, Elis Horwood Publishers, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  51. Goldstein, D., Handler, R. and Sirovich, L. (1995), “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over a Modelled Riblet-covered Surface,” J. Fluid Mech. 302, 333–376.Google Scholar
  52. Gruneberger, R. and Hage, W. (2011), “Drag Characteristics of Longitudinal and Transverse Riblets at Low Dimensionless Spacings,” Exp. Fluids, 50, 363-373.Google Scholar
  53. Han, M., Huh, J.K., Lee, S.S., and Lee, S. (2002), “Micro-Riblet Film for Drag Reduction,” Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Workshop on Transducers and Micro/Nano Technologies, Xiamen, China.Google Scholar
  54. Han, M., Lim, H.C., Jang, Y.-G., Seung, S.L., and Lee, S.-J. (2003), “Fabrication of a Micro-Riblet Film and Drag Reduction Effects on Curved Objects,” Paper # 0-7803-7731-1, presented at 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  55. Hirt, G. and Thome, M. (2007), “Large Area Rolling of Functional Metallic Micro Structures,” Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 1, 351-356.Google Scholar
  56. Hoyt, J.W. (1975), “Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction Due to Fish Slimes,” Swimming and Flying in Nature 2, 653-672.Google Scholar
  57. Jung, Y.C. and Bhushan, B. (2010), “Biomimetic Structures for Fluid Drag Reduction in Laminar and Turbulent Flows,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 1-9.Google Scholar
  58. Kennedy, J.L. (1993), Oil and Gas Pipeline Fundamentals, PennWell Books, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  59. Kesel, A. and Liedert, R. (2007), “Learning from Nature: Non-Toxic Biofouling Control by Shark Skin Effect,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 146, S130.Google Scholar
  60. Kline, S.J., Reynolds, W.C., Schraub, F.A. and Runstadler, P.W. (1967), “The Structure of Turbulent Boundary Layers.” J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.Google Scholar
  61. Koch, K. and Barthlott, W. (2009), “Superhydrophobic and Superhydrophilic Plant Surfaces: an Inspiration for Biomimetic Materials,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 367, 1487-1509.Google Scholar
  62. Koury, E. and Virk P.S. (1995), “Drag Reduction by Polymer Solutions in a Riblet-Lined Pipe,” Appl. Sci. Res. 54, 323-347.Google Scholar
  63. Krieger, K. (2004), “Do Pool Sharks Really Swim Faster?” Science 305, 636-637.Google Scholar
  64. Lee, S.J. and Lee, S.H. (2001), “Flow Field Analysis of a Turbulent Boundary Layer over a Riblet Surface,” Exp. Fluids 30, 153-166.Google Scholar
  65. Lee, J.D., Gregorek, G.M., and Korkan, K.D. (1978), “Testing Techniques and Interference Evaluation in the OSU Transonic Airfoil Facility,” Paper # AIAA-1978-1118, presented at 11th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Liu, K.N., Christodoulou, C., Riccius, O. and Joesph, D.D. (1990), “Drag Reduction in Pipes Lined with Riblets,” AIAA 28 (10), 1697-1698.Google Scholar
  67. Lowrey, P. and Harasha, J. (1991), “A Preliminary Assessment of the Feasibility of using Riblets in Internal Flows to Conserve Energy,” Energy 16, 631-642.Google Scholar
  68. Luchini, P., Manzo, F., and Pozzi, A. (1991), “Resistance of a Grooved Surface to Parallel Flow and Cross-flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 228, 87-109.Google Scholar
  69. Marentic, F.J. and Morris, T.L. (1992), “Drag Reduction Article,” United States Patent no. 5 133 516.Google Scholar
  70. Martell, M.B., Perot, J.B., and Rothstein, J.P. (2009), “Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flows over Drag-reducing Ultrahydrophobic Surfaces,” J. Fluid Mech. 620, 31-41.Google Scholar
  71. Martell, M.B., Rothstein, J.P. and Perot, J.B. (2010), “An Analysis of Superhydrophobic Turbulent Drag Reduction Mechanisms using Direct Numerical Simulation,” Phys. Fluids 22, 065102.Google Scholar
  72. Martin, S. and Bhushan, B. (2014), “Fluid Flow Analysis of a Shark-Inspired Microstructure,” J. Fluid Mech. 756, 5-29.Google Scholar
  73. Martin, S. and Bhushan, B. (2016), “Fluid Flow Analysis of Continuous and Segmented Riblet Structures,” RSC Adv. 6, 10962-10978.Google Scholar
  74. Martínez-Palou, R., Mosqueira, M., Zapata-Rendón, B., Mar-Juárez, E., Bernal-Huicochea, C., Clavel-López, J. and Aburto, J. (2011), “Transportation of Heavy and Extra-heavy Crude Oil by Pipeline: A review,” J or Petro Sci and Eng, 75, 274-282.Google Scholar
  75. Melo, L.F., Bott, T.R. and Bernardo, C.A. (eds.) (1988), Fouling Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  76. Munson, B. R., Rothmayer, A. P., Okiishi, T. M., and Huebsch, W. D. (2012), Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 7th Ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  77. Neumann, D. and Dinkelacker, A. (1991), “Drag Measurements on V-grooved Surfaces on a Body of Revolution in Axial Flow,” App Sci Res, 48, 105-114.Google Scholar
  78. Nitschke, P. (1983), “Experimental Investigation of the Turbulent Flow in Smooth and Longitudinal Grooved Pipes,” Max-Planck Institute for Stromungsforschung, Gottingen, West Germany.Google Scholar
  79. Oeffner, J. and Lauder, G.V. (2012), “The Hydrodynamic Function of Shark Skin and Two Biomimetic Applications,” J. Exp. Biology 215, 785-795.Google Scholar
  80. Ou, J., Perot, B. and Rothstein, J.P. (2004), “Laminar Drag Reduction in Microchannels using Ultrahydrophobic Surfaces,” Phys. Fluids 16, 4635-4643.Google Scholar
  81. Pritchard, P. J. and Mitchell, J. W. (2015), Fox and McDonald’s Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 9 th Ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  82. Railkin, A.I. (2004), Marine Biofouling Colonization Processes and Defenses, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  83. Ralston, E. and Swain, G. (2009), “Bioinspiration – the Solution for Biofouling Control?” Bioinsp. Biomim. 4, 1-9.Google Scholar
  84. Ray, D.L. (ed.) (1959), Marine Boring and Fouling Organisms, University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
  85. Reidy, L.W. and Anderson, G.W. (1988), “Drag Reduction for External and Internal Boundary Layers Using Riblets and Polymers,” Paper # AIAA-1988-0138, presented at 26th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  86. Reif, W. (1985), Squamation and Ecology of Sharks. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt, Germany, 78, 1-255.Google Scholar
  87. Rohr, J.J., Andersen, G.W., Reidy, L.W. and Hendricks, E.W. (1992), “A Comparison of the Drag-reducing Benefits of Riblets in Internal and External Flows,” Exp. in Fluids, 13, 361-368.Google Scholar
  88. Sareen, A., Deters, R.W., Henry, S.P. and Selig, M.S. (2011), “Drag Reduction Using Riblet Film Applied to Airfoils for Wind Turbines,” Paper # AIAA-2011-558, presented at 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Scardino, A.J. (2009), “Surface Modification Approaches to Control Marine Biofouling,” in Advances in Marine Antifouling Coatings and Technologies (eds. Hellio, C. and Yebra, D.), pp. 664-692, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  90. Schulz, M.J., Shanov, V.N. and Yun, Y. (eds.) (2009), Nanomedicine Design of Particles, Sensors, Motors, Implants, Robots, and Devices, Artech House, Boston.Google Scholar
  91. Schumacher, J.F., Aldred, N., Callow, M.E., Finlay, J.A., Callow, J.A., Clare, A.S. and Brennan, A.B. (2007), “Species-Specific Engineered Antifouling Topographies: Correlations between the Settlement of Algal Zoospores and Barnacle Cyprids,” Biofouling 23, 307- 317.Google Scholar
  92. Shephard, K.L. (1994), “Functions for Fish Mucus,” Rev. Fish Biology and Fisheries 4,401-429.Google Scholar
  93. Shirtliff, M. and Leid, J.G. (eds.) (2009), The Role of Biofilms in Device-Related Infections, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  94. Somerscales, E.F.C. and Knudsen, J.G. (eds.) (1981), Fouling of Heat Transfer Equipment, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington.Google Scholar
  95. Subaschandar, N., Kumar, R., and Sundaram, S. (1999), “Drag Reduction Due to Riblets on a GAW(2) Airfoil,” J. of Aircraft, 36 (5), 890-892.Google Scholar
  96. Sundaram, S., Viswanath, P.R., and Rudrakumar, S. (1996), “Viscous Drag Reduction Using Riblets on NACA 0012 Airfoil to Moderate Incidence,” AIAA 34 (14), 676-682.Google Scholar
  97. Sundaram, S., Viswanath, P.R., and Subaschandar, N. (1999), “Viscous Drag Reduction Using Riblets on a Swept Wing,” AIAA 37 (7), 851-856.Google Scholar
  98. Viswanath, P. R. (1999), “Riblets on Airfoil and Wings: A Review,” Paper # AIAA-99-3402, presented at the AIAA 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  99. Viswanath, P. R. and Mukund, R. (1995), “Turbulent Drag Reduction Using Riblets on a Supercritical Airfoil at Transonic Speeds,” AIAA 33 (5), 945-947.Google Scholar
  100. Viswanath, P.R. (2002), “Aircraft Viscous Drag Reduction using Riblets,” Prog Aerospace Sci, 38, 571-600.Google Scholar
  101. Vo-Dinh, T. (ed.) (2007), Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  102. Walker, J., Surman, S. and Jass, J. (eds.) (2000), Industrial Biofouling Detection, Prevention and Control, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  103. Walsh, M.J. (1982), “Turbulent Boundary Layer Drag Reduction using Riblets,” Paper # AIAA-1982-0169, presented at AIAA 20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando FL, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  104. Walsh, M.J. (1990a), “Effect of Detailed Surface Geometry on Riblet Drag Reduction Performance,” J. Aircraft, 27 (6), 572-573.Google Scholar
  105. Walsh, M. J. (1990b), “Riblets. Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers,” Progr. in Astronaut. and Aeronaut., 123, 203-261.Google Scholar
  106. Walsh, M. J. and Lindemann, A.M. (1984), “Optimization and Application of Riblets for Turbulent Drag Reduction,” Paper # AIAA-1984-0347, presented at AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  107. Walsh, M. J. and Anders, J. B., Jr. (1989), “Riblet/LEBU Research at NASA Langley,” Appl. Sci. Res. 46, 255-262.Google Scholar
  108. Weiss, M.H. (1997), “Implementation of Drag Reduction Techniques in Natural Gas Pipelines,” presented at 10th European Drag Reduction Working Meeting, Berlin, Germany, March 19-21.Google Scholar
  109. Wen, L., Weaver, J. C., and Lauder, G. V. (2014), “Biomimetic Shark Skin: Design, Fabrication, and Hydrodynamic Function,” J. Exp. Biology 217, 1656-1666.Google Scholar
  110. Wetzel, K.K. and Farokhi, S. (1996), “Interaction of Riblets and Vortex Generators on an Airfoil,” Paper # AIAA-1996-2428-CP, presented at the AIAA 14th Applied Aero-dynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  111. White, F. (2006), Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  112. Wilkinson, S.P. and Lazos, B.S. (1988), “Direct Drag and Hot-wire Measurements on Thin-element Riblet Arrays,” in Turbulence Management and Relaminarisation (Liepman, H.W. and Narasimha, R., eds.), pp. 121-131, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanoprobe Laboratory for Bio- and Nanotechnology and Biomimetics (NLBB)The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations