Advertisement

Extreme Scuba Diving Medicine

  • Simon J. MitchellEmail author
  • David J. Doolette
Chapter

Abstract

The vast majority of recreational dives are performed by divers using single cylinders of compressed air and open-circuit breathing systems, typically to a maximum depth of 40 m of seawater (msw). More extreme dives (in terms of depth and duration) are performed by a small subgroup of recreational divers who refer to their activity as ‘technical diving’. Technical divers substitute helium for nitrogen in gas mixes for deep diving to reduce the narcotic effect of nitrogen respired at high partial pressures and to reduce the density of the gas. These mixes also contain less oxygen than air in order to manage the risk of cerebral oxygen toxicity. Adequate gas supplies for long dives are carried in multiple cylinders, or divers may utilise ‘rebreather’ devices that recycle expired gas through a carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbent and which include a system for maintaining a safe inspired pressure of oxygen (PO2) as oxygen is consumed. These devices are complex and error-prone, and there is some evidence for relatively high accident rates in their use. Using these techniques, compressed gas dives between 40 and 100 msw are now relatively ‘routine’, and more extreme dives to depths in excess of 300 msw have been completed. A challenge of deep technical diving is the effect on respiratory physiology. There are multiple factors (including increased density of the respired gas) that increase the work of breathing during deep dives. This, in turn, may cause significant perturbation of normal respiratory control. In particular, there is a tendency for divers to hypoventilate and retain CO2 which can produce a number of dangerous secondary effects. Another significant challenge is uncertainty over the optimal protocol for decompression from deep dives. Technical divers utilise progressively more oxygen-rich breathing mixes during ascent in order to accelerate inert gas elimination, but there is uncertainty over how to plan the duration and depths of the ‘decompression stops’ that are completed during the ascent to allow time for this elimination to occur.

Keywords

Technical diving Pneumothorax Mediastinal emphysema Embolic injury Cerebral oxygen toxicity Decompression sickness Hypercapnia Decompression algorithms 

References

  1. 1.
    Mitchell SJ, Doolette DJ. Recreational technical diving part 1. An introduction to technical diving. Diving Hyperb Med. 2013;43:86–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doolette DJ, Mitchell SJ. Recreational technical diving part 2. Decompression from deep technical dives. Diving Hyperb Med. 2013;43:96–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Molvaer O. Otorhinolaryngological aspects of diving. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 227–64.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neuman TS. Arterial gas embolism and pulmonary barotrauma. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 557–77.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vann RD, Hamilton RW. Central nervous system oxyen toxicity In: Vann RD, Mitchell SJ, Denoble PJ, Anthony TG, editors. Technical diving conference proceedings. Durham: Divers Alert Network; 2009. p. 38–66.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett PB, Mitchell SJ. Nitrogen narcosis, oxygen narcosis, and the high pressure nervous syndrome. In: Vann RD, Mitchell SJ, Denoble PJ, Anthony TG, editors. Technical diving conference proceedings. Durham: Divers Alert Network; 2009. p. 67–98.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Francis TJR, Mitchell SJ. Pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 530–56.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vann RD, Butler FK, Mitchell SJ, Moon RE. Decompression illness. Lancet. 2011;377:153–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Francis TJR, Mitchell SJ. Manifestations of decompression disorders. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. The physiology and medicine of diving. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 578–99.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richardson D. Training scuba divers: a fatality and risk analysis. In: Vann RD, Lang MA, editors. Recreational diving fatalities. Proceedings of the Divers Alert Network 2010 April 8–10 workshop. Durham: Divers Alert Network; 2011. p. 119–64.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ladd G, Stepan V, Stevens L. The abacus project: establishing the risk of recreational scuba death and decompression illness. SPUMS J. 2002;32:124–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fock AW. Analysis of closed-circuit rebreather deaths 1998–2010. Diving Hyperb Med. 2013;43:78–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richardson D. Taking ‘tec’ to ‘rec’: the future of technical diving. SPUMS J. 2003;33:202–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doolette DJ, Mitchell SJ. Hyperbaric conditions. Compr Physiol. 2011;1:163–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warkander DE, Norfleet WT, Nagasawa GK, Lundgren CEG. Physiologically and subjectively acceptable breathing resistance in divers’ breathing gear. Undersea Biomed Res. 1992;19:427–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wood LDH, Bryan AC. Effect of increased ambient pressure on flow volume curve of the lung. J Appl Physiol. 1969;27:4–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hesser CM, Linnarsson D, Fagraeus L. Pulmonary mechanics and work of breathing at maximal ventilation and raised air pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1981;50:747–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lundgren CEG. Immersion effects. In: Lundgren CEG, Miller JN, editors. The lung at depth. New York: Marcel Decker; 1999. p. 91–128.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koulouris NG, Valta P, Lavoie A, Corbeil C, Chasse M, Braidy J, Milic-Emili J. A simple method to detect expiratory flow limitation during spontaneous breathing. Eur Respir J. 1995;8:306–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moon RE, Cherry AD, Stolp BW, Camporesi EM. Pulmonary gas exchange in diving. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:668–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poon CS. Ventilatory control in hypercapnia and exercise: optimization hypothesis. J Appl Physiol. 1987;62:2447–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Camporesi EM, Bosco G. Ventilation, gas exchange, and exercise under pressure. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. Bennett and Elliott’s physiology and medicine of diving. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 77–114.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mummery HJ, Stolp BW, deL Dear G, Doar PO, Natoli MJ, Boso AE, Archibold JD, Hobbs GW, El-Moalem HE, Moon RE. Effects of age and exercise on physiological dead space during simulated dives at 2.8 atm abs. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94:507–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell SJ, Cronje F, Meintjes WAJ, Britz HC. Fatal respiratory failure during a technical rebreather dive at extreme pressure. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78:81–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harris R. Rebreathers: overcoming obstacles in exploration. In: Vann RD, Denoble PJ, Pollock NW, editors. Rebreather forum 3 proceedings. Durham: AAUS/DAN/PADI; 2014. p. 56–61.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warkander DE, Norfleet WT, Nagasawa GK, Lundgren CE. CO2 retention with minimal symptoms but severe dysfunction during wet simulated dives to 6.8 atm abs. Undersea Biomed Res. 1990;17:515–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shykoff BE, Warkander DE. Exercise carbon dioxide (CO2) retention with inhaled CO2 and breathing resistance. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2012;39:815–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lambertsen CJ, Ewing JH, Kough RH, Gould R, Stroud MW. Oxygen toxicity. Arterial and internal jugular blood gas composition in man during inhalation of air, 100% O2 and 2% CO2 in O2 at 3.5 atmospheres ambient pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1955;8:255–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trytko B, Mitchell SJ. Extreme survival: a deep technical diving accident. SPUMS J. 2005;35:23–7.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hemmingsen EA. Cavitation in gas-supersatured solutions. J Appl Phys. 1975;46:213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eckenhoff RG, Olstad CS, Carrod G. Human dose-response relationship for decompression and endogenous bubble formation. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69:914–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weathersby PK, Homer LD, Flynn ET. Homogenous nucleation of gas bubbles in vivo. J Appl Physiol. 1982;53:940–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Evans A, Walder DN. Significance of gas micronuclei in the aetiology of decompression sickness. Nature. 1969;222:251–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McDonough PM, Hemmingsen EA. Bubble formation in crustaceans following decompression from hyperbaric gas exposure. J Appl Physiol. 1984;56:513–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vann RD, Grimstad J, Nielsen CH. Evidence for gas nuclei in decompressed rats. Undersea Biomed Res. 1980;7:107–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weathersby PK, Meyer P, Flynn ET, Homer LD, Survanshi S. Nitrogen gas exchange in the human knee. J Appl Physiol. 1986;61:1534–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Doolette DJ, Mitchell SJ. A biophysical basis for inner ear decompression sickness. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94:2145–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tikuisis P, Gerth WA. Decompression theory. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. Bennett and Elliott’s physiology and medicine and diving. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 419–54.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boycott AE, Damant GCC, Haldane JS. The prevention of compressed-air illness. J Hygiene (Lond). 1908;8:342–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hamilton RW, Turner P. Decompression techniques based on special gas mixes for deep cave exploration [Abstract]. Undersea Biomed Res. 1988;15(Suppl):70.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Workman RD. Calculation of decompression schedules for nitrogen-oxygen and helium oxygen dives. Research Report. Washington, DC: Navy Experimental Diving Unit; 1965. Report No: 6–65.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bühlmann AA. Experimentalle Grundlagen der risikoarmen Dekompression nach Überdruckexpositionen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1982;112:48–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bühlmann AA. Die Berechnung der risikoarmen Dekompression. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1988;118:185–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Buhlmann AA. Decompression – decompression sickness. In: Michel GPt, editor. Berlin: Springer; 1984.(English translation of Dekompression – dekompressionkrankheit, first published 1983).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gernhardt ML. Development and evaluation of a decompression stress index based on tissue bubble dynamics [Thesis]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 1991.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gerth WA, Vann RD. Probabilistic gas and bubble dynamics models of decompression sickness occurrence in air and N2-O2 diving. Undersea Hyperb Med. 1997;24:275–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yount DE, Hoffman DC. On the use of a bubble formation model to calculate diving tables. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986;57:149–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yount DE, Maiken EB, Baker EC. Implications of the varying permeability model for reverse dive profiles. In: Lang MA, Lehner CE, editors. Proceedings of the reverse dive profiles workshop; 1999 Oct 29–30; Washington DC. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 2000. p. 29–60.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wienke BR. Reduced gradient bubble model. Int J Biomed Comput. 1990;26:237–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baker EC. Clearing up the confusion about “deep stops”. Immersed. 1998;3:23–31.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Baker EC. Varying permeability model (VPM) decompression program in FORTRAN with Boyle’s law compensation algorithm (VPM-B) [Internet]. cited 20 Jan 2004. 2003. Available from URL: ftp://decompression.org/Baker.
  52. 52.
    Doolette DJ. Decompression practice and health outcome during a technical diving project. SPUMS J. 2004;34:189–95.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    LeMessurier DH, Hills BA. Decompression sickness: a thermodynamic approach arising from a study of Torres Strait diving techniques. Hvalradet Skrifter. 1965;48:84.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pyle RL. The importance of deep safety stops: rethinking ascent patterns from decompression dives. SPUMS J. 1997;27:112–5.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Neuman TS, Hall DA, Linaweaver PG. Gas phase separation during decompression in man: ultrasound monitoring. Undersea Biomed Res. 1976;3:121–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nishi RY, Brubakk AO, Eftedal OS. Bubble detection. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS, editors. Bennett and Elliott’s physiology and medicine of diving. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2003. p. 501–29.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Blatteau JE, Hugon M, Gardette B, Sainty JM, Galland FM. Bubble incidence after staged decompression from 50 or 60 msw: effect of adding deep stops. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76:490–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Blatteau JE, Hugon M, Gardette B. Deeps stops during decompression from 50 to 100 msw didn’t reduce bubble formation in man. In: Bennett PB, Wienke BR, Mitchell SJ, editors. Decompression and the deep stop. Proceedings of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop; 2008 Jun 24–25; Salt Lake City (UT). Durham: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society; 2009. p. 195–206.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gutvik CR, Dunford RG, Dujic Z, Brubakk AO. Parameter estimation of the Copernicus decompression model with venous gas emboli in human divers. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48:625–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Doolette DJ, Gerth WA, Gault KA. Redistribution of decompression stop time from shallow to deep stops increases incidence of decompression sickness in air decompression dives. Technical Report. Panama City: Navy Experimental Diving Unit; 2011 Report No: NEDU TR 11-06.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hamilton RW, Thalmann ED, Flynn ET, Temple DJ. No-stop 60 fsw wet and dry dives using air, heliox, and oxygen-nitrogen mixtures. Data report on projects 88-06 and 88-06A. Technical Report. Silver Spring: Naval Medical Research Center; 2002. Report No: 2002-002.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Survanshi SS, Parker EC, Gummin DD, Flynn ET, Toner CB, Temple DJ, et al. Human decompression trial with 1.3 ATA oxygen in helium. Technical Report. Bethesda: Naval Medical Research Institute; 1998. Report No: 98-09. 80 p.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Farmer JC, Thomas WG, Youngblood DG, Bennett PB. Inner ear decompression sickness. Laryngoscope. 1976;86:1315–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bennett PB, Vann RD, Roby J, Youngblood D. Theory and development of subsaturation decompression procedures for depths in excess of 400 feet. In: Shilling CW, Beckett MW, editors. Underwater Physiology VI. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Underwater Physiology. Bethesda: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; 1978. p. 367–81.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bühlmann AA, Gehring H. Inner ear disorders resulting from inadequate decompression “vertigo bends”. In: Lambertsen CJ, editor. Underwater Physiology V. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Underwater Physiology. Bethesda: FASEB; 1976. p. 341–7.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lambertsen CJ, Idicula J. A new gas lesion syndrome in man, induced by “isobaric gas counterdiffusion”. J Appl Physiol. 1975;39:434–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cantais E, Louge P, Suppini A, Foster PP, Palmier B. Right-to-left shunt and risk of decompression illness with cochleovestibular and cerebral symptoms in divers: case control study in 101 consecutive dive accidents. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:84–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Klingmann C. Inner ear decompression sickness in compressed-air diving. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2012;39:589–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mitchell SJ, Doolette DJ. Selective vulnerability of the inner ear to decompression sickness in divers with right to left shunt: the role of tissue gas supersaturation. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:298–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Navy Experimental Diving UnitPanama CityUSA

Personalised recommendations