The Enactment of Information Literacy: An Exploratory Study Among Interdisciplinary PhD Students

  • Ola Pilerot
  • Louise Limberg
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)


This paper reports a practice-based study of the enactment of information literacy (IL) in a network of interdisciplinary PhD students. Previous research on this topic is scarce. The empirical material was produced through semi-structured interviews and work-place visits. It is concluded that the enactment of IL in the practice under study is a collectively sustained project that unfolds in dialogue with others and through interaction with material objects. This process comprises activities such as participation in seminars and conferences, which offer opportunities for discussions about work in progress, and is situated in socio-material practices shaped by historically developed conceptions of what it means to be an interdisciplinary researcher.


Information literacy PhD students Interdisciplinary research 


  1. 1.
    Gherardi, S.: How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox, A.: An exploration of the practice approach and its place in information science. J. Inf. Sci. 38, 176–188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hjørland, B., Albrechtsen, H.: Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 46, 400–425 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Talja, S., Maula, H.: Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: a domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. J. Documentation 59, 673–691 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chubin, D.E.: The Conceptualization of scientific specialties. The Sociological Quarterly 17, 448–476 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crane, D.: Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bates, M.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Libr. Trends 45, 155–164 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitworth, A.: Radical Information Literacy: Reclaiming the Political Heart of the IL Movement. Chandos Publishing, London (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Case, D.O.: Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 3rd edn. Bingley, Emerald (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Catalano, A.J.: Patterns of graduate students’ information seeking behaviour: a meta-synthesis of the literature. J. Documentation 69, 243–274 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carpenter, J.: Researchers of tomorrow: the research behaviour of generation y doctoral students. Inf. Serv. Use. 32, 3–17 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delgadillo, R., Lynch, B.P.: Future historians: their quest for information. Coll. Res. Libr. 60, 245–259 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R., Bergeron, P.: In their own image? a comparison of doctoral students’ and faculty members’ referencing behaviour. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 64, 1045–1054 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiliamson, K., Bernath, V., Wright, S., Sullivan, J.: Research students in the electronic age: impacts of changing information behaviour on information literacy needs. Communications in Information Literacy (2007).[]=Fall2007AR1&path[]=48
  15. 15.
    Vezzosi, M.: Doctoral students’ information behaviour: an exploratory study at the University of Parma (Italy). New Libr. World 110, 65–80 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steinerová, J.: Seeking relevance in academic information use. Information Research, 13 (2008).
  17. 17.
    George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E.C., St. Clair, G., Stein, J.: Scholarly use of information: graduate students’ information seeking behaviour. Information Research, 11 (2006)
  18. 18.
    Gullbekk, E., Rullestad, T., Torras I Calvo, M-C.: PhD Candidates and the Research Process: The Library’s Contribution. Universitetsbiblioteket i Oslo, Oslo (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bøyum, I., Aabø, S.: The information practices of business PhD students. New Library World. 116, 187–200 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jamali, H.R., Nicholas, D.: Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behaviour of scientists. Inf. Process. Manage. 46, 233–243 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, J., Anderson, A., Burnett, G.: Peer Relationships and Information Sharing between LIS Doctoral Students. In: Proceedings of the 77th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, vol. 51, pp. 1–4 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fleming-May, R., Yuro, L.: From student to scholar: the academic library and social sciences PhD students’ transformation. Portal Libr. Acad. 9, 199–221 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salter, L., Hearn, A. (eds.): Outside the Lines: Issues in Interdisciplinary Research. McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press, Montreal (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frodeman, R.: Introduction. In: Frodeman, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, pp. xxiv–xxxviii. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boradkar, P.: design as problem solving. In: Frodeman, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frodeman, R. (red.): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reckwitz, A.: Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theor. 5, 243–263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nicolini, D.: Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pilerot, O.: Design Researchers’ Information Sharing: The Enactment of a Discipline. Valfrid, Borås (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Knorr Cetina, K.: Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theo. Culture Soc. 14, 1–30 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suchman, L.: Affiliative Objects. Organization 12, 379–399 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barad, K.M.: Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs J. Women Culture Soc. 28, 801–831 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gherardi, S.: Introduction: the critical power of the ‘Practice Lens’. Manage. Learn. 40, 115–128 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shove, E., Pantzar, M., Watson, M.: The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schatzki, T.R.: A primer on practices: theory and research. In: Higgs, J. (ed.) Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, pp. 13–26. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang, Y., Wildemuth, B.M.: Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth, B. (ed.) Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, pp. 308–319. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S.: InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2009)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wilson, P.: Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. Greenwood P, Westport (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish School of Library and Information ScienceUniversity of BoråsBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations