Models of Science and Models in Science

  • Carlo CellucciEmail author
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 25)


This article describes and compares four models of science: the analytic-synthetic model, the hypothetico-deductive model, the semantic model, and the analytic model. It also briefly discusses to what extent each of these models is capable of accounting for models in science.


Scientific Theory Mathematical Object Semantic Model Axiom System Theory Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boltzmann, L.E.: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems. Selected Writings. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borges, J.L.: A Universal History of Infamy. Dutton, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  3. Calvino, I.: Collection of Sand. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R.: Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1939)Google Scholar
  5. Carnap, R.: Philosophical Foundations of Physics. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Basic Books, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  6. Carnap, R.: Logical Syntax of Language. Routledge, London (2001)Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, L.: Sylvie and Bruno Concluded. In: The Complete Illustrated Lewis Carroll, pp. 457–674. Wordsworth, Ware (1996)Google Scholar
  8. Cellucci, C.: Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method. Springer, Dordrecht (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, I.B.: Introduction to Newton’s ‘Principia’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curry, H.B.: Foundations of Mathematical Logic. Dover, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  11. Descartes, R.: Œuvres. Vrin, Paris (1996)Google Scholar
  12. Frege, G.: Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Blackwell, Oxford (1980)Google Scholar
  13. Gödel, K.: Collected Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1986–2002)Google Scholar
  14. Hempel, C.G.: The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  15. Herschel, J.F.W.: Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. Longmans, London (1851)Google Scholar
  16. Hilbert, D.: Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Springer, Berlin (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kline, M.: Mathematics for the Nonmathematician. Dover, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  19. Morrison, M., Morgan, M.S. (eds.): Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  20. Newton, I.: Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light. Dover, New York (1952)Google Scholar
  21. Newton, I.: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and The System of the World. University of California Press, Berkeley (1962)Google Scholar
  22. Newton, I.: The Mathematical Papers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1967–1981)Google Scholar
  23. Novalis: Notes for a Romantic Encyclopedia. Das Allgemeine Brouillon. State University of New York Press, Albany (2007)Google Scholar
  24. Pólya, G.: Heuristic Reasoning and the Theory of Probability. Am. Math. Mon. 48, 450–465 (1941)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pólya, G.: Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1954)Google Scholar
  26. Ribet, K.A.: From the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture to Fermat’s Last Theorem. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse-Mathématiques 11, 116–139 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riemann, B.: Gesammelte mathematische Werke und wissenschaftlicher Nachlass. Teubner, Leipzig (1892)Google Scholar
  28. Shoenfield, J.R.: Mathematical Logic. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1967)Google Scholar
  29. van Fraassen, B.C.: The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Fraassen, B.C.: Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science. In: Churchland, P.M., Hooker C.A. (eds.) Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, pp. 245–308. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)Google Scholar
  31. van Fraassen, B.C.: Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Fraassen, B.C.: Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whewell, W.: The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon Their History. Parker, London (1847)Google Scholar
  34. Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Routledge, London (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations