Advertisement

Models, Idealisations, and Realism

  • Juha Saatsi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 25)

Abstract

I explore a challenge that idealisations pose to scientific realism and argue that the realist can best accommodate idealisations by capitalising on certain modal features of idealised models that are underwritten by laws of nature.

Keywords

Idealise Model Scientific Realism Semantic View Predictive Success Empirical Adequacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

A version of this paper was presented at a workshop on Models and Inferences in Science in Rome. Thanks to the workshop audience, as well as James Fraser, Steven French, and especially Arnon Levy, for helpful comments.

References

  1. Batterman, R.W.: Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 36(2), 225–244 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bueno, O., French, S.: Can Mathematics Explain Physical Phenomena?, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 63(1), 85–113 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. Butterfield, J.: Emergence, reduction and supervenience: A varied landscape. Found. Phys. 41(6), 920–959 (2011a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butterfield, J.: Less is different: Emergence and reduction reconciled. Found. Phys. 41(6), 1065–1135 (2011b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Da Costa, N., French, S.: Science and partial truth: A unitary approach to models and scientific reasoning. Oxford University Press, USA (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giere, R.: Explaining science: A cognitive approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis, D.: On the plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  8. McMullin, E.: Galilean idealization. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 16, 247–273 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Melia, J.: Weaseling away the indispensability argument. Mind 109, 455–479 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Menon, T., Callender, C.: Ch-Ch-Changes philosophical questions raised by phase transitions. In: Robert, B. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, pp. 189. OUP, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Niiniluoto, I.: Idealization, counterfactuals, and truthlikeness. In Jerzy, B., Andrzej, K., Theo, A. F. K., Krzysztof, L., Katarzyna, P., Piotr, P. (eds.) The Courage of Doing Philosophy: Essays Dedicated to Leszek Nowak, pp. 103–122. Rodopi (2007)Google Scholar
  12. Norton, J.: Approximation and idealization: Why the difference matters. Philos. Sci. 79(2), 207–232 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Odenbaugh, J.: True lies: Realism, robustness and models. Philos. Sci. 78(5), 1177–1188 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saatsi, J.: Idealized models as inferentially veridical representations: A conceptual framework. In: Humphreys, P., Imbert, C. (eds.) Representations, Models, and Simulations, pp. 234–249. Routledge, London (2011a)Google Scholar
  15. Saatsi, J.: The enhanced indispensability argument: Representational versus explanatory role of mathematics in science. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 62(1), 143–154 (2011b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saatsi, J. (forthcoming). On the ‘Indispensable Explanatory Role’ of Mathematics. MindGoogle Scholar
  17. Saatsi, J., Vickers, P.: Miraculous success? Inconsistency and untruth in Kirchhoff’s diffraction theory. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 62(1), 29–46 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saatsi, J.T.: Reconsidering the Fresnel-Maxwell case study. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 36, 509–538 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sorensen, R.: Veridical idealizations. In: Frappier, M., Meynell, L., Brown, J. R. (eds.) Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts, pp. 30–50. Routledge (2012)Google Scholar
  20. Strevens, M.: Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Harvard University Press, Harvard (2008)Google Scholar
  21. Toon, A.: Models as Make-Believe: Imagination, Fiction, and Scientific Representation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy, Religion, and History of ScienceUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations