Advertisement

Heterogeneous Self-Employment and Work Values: The Evidence from Online Freelance Marketplaces

  • Andrey ShevchukEmail author
  • Denis Strebkov
Chapter

Abstract

This study contributes to the literature on heterogeneous self-employment by investigating the diversity of work motivation. Using two samples obtained from freelancers, who participate in online freelance marketplaces, we analyze the relationship between individual work values and self-employment situations. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed four value dimensions: (1) intrinsic, (2) social, (3) comfort, and (4) security. Using multinomial logistic regression, we found that people who work exclusively as freelancers, moonlighters who also hold regular jobs, and entrepreneurs who also run small businesses have distinct sets of work values. Genuine freelancers ignore security and social values, but seek intrinsic rewards and comfort to balance work and life. Entrepreneurs show the least preference for security, do not appreciate comfort, but seek intrinsic and social job rewards. Moonlighters show the highest preference for security, value social rewards, but ignore intrinsic rewards and comfort. Although the study deals with the self-employed, it also sheds light on the general association between work values and jobs.

Keywords

Self-Employment Work values Freelancers Entrepreneurs Moonlighters 

References

  1. Agrawal, A., Horton, J., Lacetera, N., & Lyons, E. (2013). Digitization and the contract labor market: A research agenda. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved March 29, 2014, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19525
  2. Aguilar, A. C., García Muñoz, T. M., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2013). Heterogeneous self-employment and satisfaction in Latin America. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguinis, H., & Lawal, S. O. (2013). eLancing: A review and research agenda for bridging the science–practice gap. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arum, R., & Müller, W. (Eds.). (2004). The reemergence of self-employment: A comparative study of self-employment dynamics and social inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, R. et al. (2013). Report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Accessed at http://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/Education-Resources/Reports.aspx
  6. Bögenhold, D., & Fachinger, U. (2012). How diverse is entrepreneurship? Observations on the social heterogeneity of self-employment in Germany. In J. Bonnet, M. Dejardin, & A. Madrid Guijarro (Eds.), The shift to the entrepreneurial society: A built economy in education, sustainability and regulation (pp. 227–243). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Bögenhold, D., Heinonen, J., & Akola, E. (2014). Entrepreneurship and independent professionals: Social and economic logics. International Advances in Economic Research, 20(3), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caraway, B. (2010). Online labour markets: An inquiry into odesk providers. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 4(2), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elizur, D., Borg, I., Hunt, R., & Magyari Beck, I. (1991). The structure of work values: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ester, P., Braun, M., & Vinken, H. (2006). Eroding work values? In P. Ester, M. Braun, & H. Vinken (Eds.), Globalization, value change, and generations: A cross-national and intergenerational perspective. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Gallie, D. (2007). Welfare regimes, employment systems and job preference orientations. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallie, D., Felstead, A., & Green, F. (2012). Job preferences and the intrinsic quality of work: The changing attitudes of British employees 1992–2006. Work, Employment & Society, 26(5), 806–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halaby, C. N. (2003). Where job values come from: Family and schooling background, cognitive ability, and gender. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halman, L., & Müller, H. (2006). Contemporary work values in Africa and Europe comparing orientations to work in African and European Societies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 47(2), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hitlin, S., & Allyn Piliavin, J. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 359–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2013). Online labor markets: An informal freelancer economy. Philadelphia: Institute for Business and Information Technology. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://ibit.temple.edu/blog/2013/02/13/online-labor-markets-an-informal-freelancer-economy/
  18. Johnson, M. K. (2002). Social origins, adolescent experiences, and work value trajectories during the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 80(4), 1307–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, M. K., & Monserud, M. A. (2010). Judgments about work and the features of young adults’ jobs. Work and Occupations, 37(2), 194–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, M. K., Mortimer, J. T., Lee, J. C., & Stern, M. J. (2007). Judgments about work: Dimensionality revisited. Work and Occupations, 34(3), 290–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Kalleberg, A. L., & Marsden, P. V. (2013). Changing work values in the United States, 1973–2006. Social Science Research, 42(2), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitching, J., & Smallbone, D. (2012). Are freelancers a neglected form of small business? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(1), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of Person-job, Person-organization, Person-group, and Person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunda, G., Barley, S. R., & Evans, J. (2002). Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(2), 234–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leung, M. D. (2014). Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 136–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone, T. W., & Laubacher, R. J. (1998). The dawn of the e-lance economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 144–152.Google Scholar
  29. McKeown, T. (2005). Non-standard employment: When even the elite are precarious. Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 276–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Osnowitz, D. (2010). Freelancing expertise: Contract professionals in the new economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Panos, G. A., Pouliakas, K., & Zangelidis, A. (2014). Multiple job holding, skill diversification, and mobility. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 53(2), 223–272.Google Scholar
  32. Pink, D. H. (2001). Free agent nation: How America’s new independent workers are transforming the way we live. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  33. Roe, R. A., & Ester, P. (1999). Values and work: Empirical findings and theoretical perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schein, E. H. (1990). Career anchors: Discovering your real values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  37. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Shevchuk, A., & Strebkov, D. (2015). The rise of freelance contracting on the Russian-language internet. Small Enterprise Research, 22(2–3), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turunen, T. (2011). Work orientations in flux? European Societies, 13(5), 641–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting online surveys. Quality and Quantity, 40(3), 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  43. De Witte, H., Halman, L., & Gelissen, J. (2004). European work orientations at the end of the twentieth century. In W. A. Arts & L. Halman (Eds.), European values at the turn of the millennium (pp. 255–282). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, K. B. (2006). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(3)Google Scholar
  45. Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology, Department of SociologyNational Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations