Advertisement

Predicting Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Medical Records

  • Jesse DavisEmail author
  • Vítor Santos Costa
  • Peggy Peissig
  • Michael Caldwell
  • David Page
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9521)

Abstract

Learning from electronic medical records (EMR) poses many challenges from a knowledge representation point of view. This chapter focuses on how to cope with two specific challenges: the relational nature of EMRs and the uncertain dependence between a patient’s past and future health status. We discuss three different approaches for allowing standard propositional learners to incorporate relational information. We evaluate these approaches on three real-world tasks where the goal is to use EMRs to predict whether a patient will have an adverse reaction to a medication.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Electronic Medical Record Inductive Logic Programming Conditional Mutual Information Electronic Medical Record Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

JD is partially supported by the Research Fund K.U.Leuven (CREA/11/015 and OT/11/051), EU FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (\(\#\)294068) and FWO-Vlaanderen (G.0356.12). VSC is funded by ERDF through Programme COMPETE and by the Portuguese Government through FCT Foundation for Science and Technology projects LEAP (PTDC/EIA-CCO/112158/2009) and ADE (PTDC/EIA-EIA/121686/2010). MC, PP, EB and DP gratefully acknowledge the support of NIGMS grant R01GM097618-01.

References

  1. 1.
    Alphonse, E., Rouveirol, C.: Lazy propositionalisation for relational learning. In: 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 256–260. IOS Press (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd, K., Davis, J., Page, D., Costa, V.S.: Unachievable region in precision-recall space and its effect on empirical evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning. Omnipress (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U.: An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology. SIGMOD Rec. 26(1), 65–74 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, J., Ong, I., Struyf, J., Burnside, E., Page, D., Costa, V.S.: Change of representation for statistical relational learning. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2719–2726 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, J., Goadrich, M.: The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine learning, pp. 233–240. ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian networks classifiers. Mach. Learn. 29, 131–163 (1997)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kearney, P., Baigent, C., Godwin, J., Halls, H., Emberson, J., Patrono, C.: Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 332, 1302–1308 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kramer, S., Lavrac, N., Flach, P.: Propositionalization approaches to relational data mining. In: Džeroski, S., Lavrac, N. (eds.) Relational Data Mining Part III, pp. 262–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landwehr, N., Kersting, K., and Raedt, L. D. nFOIL: Integrating Naive Bayes and FOIL. In: Proceeding of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 795–800 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Landwehr, N., Passerini, A., Raedt, L.D., Frasconi, P.: kFOIL: Learning simple relational kernels. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lavrač, N., Džeroski, S. (eds.): Relational Data Mining. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lavrač, N., Džeroski, S.: Inductive learning of relations from noisy examples. In: Muggleton, S. (ed.) Inductive Logic Programming, pp. 495–516. Academic Press, London (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarty, C., Wilke, R., Giampietro, P., Wesbrook, S., Caldwell, M.: Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank. Personalized Med. 2, 49–79 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muggleton, S.: Inverse entailment and Progol. New Gener. Comput. 13, 245–286 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Platt, R., Carnahan, R.: The US food and drug administration’s mini-sentinel program. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 21, 1–303 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pompe, U., Kononenko, I.: Naive Bayesian classifier within ILP-R. In: De Raedt, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, pp. 417–436 (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Popescul, A., Ungar, L., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D. Statistical relational learning for document mining. In: Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 275–282 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Learning logical definitions from relations. Mach. Learn. 5, 239–266 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Srinivasan, A.: The Aleph Manual (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Information Science and Statistics. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesse Davis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vítor Santos Costa
    • 4
  • Peggy Peissig
    • 2
  • Michael Caldwell
    • 2
  • David Page
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKu LeuvenHeverleeBelgium
  2. 2.Marshfield ClinicMarshfieldUSA
  3. 3.University of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  4. 4.CRACS INESC-TEC and FCUPUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations