Advertisement

Semi-automatic Metadata Generation Workflow for Developing a Continuing Education Resource Repository

  • Jung-ran ParkEmail author
  • Andrew Brenza
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9469)

Abstract

This paper presents a high-level conceptualized workflow for the development of a repository related to continuing educational resources for the metadata professions. One of the major challenges facing cataloging and metadata communities concerns current developments and emerging trends in standards and technologies for managing digital information. Through utilization and integration of available open-source (semi)automatic metadata generation tools, we attempted to design a repository that maximizes the self-sufficiency of the system components while also generating high quality metadata records for metadata resources. We also attempted to design a workflow that will permit the repository to serve its primary function as a continually updated warehouse of material that will constitute a centralized resource of continuing education needs of metadata.

Keywords

Metadata Repository Extensible Markup Language (XML) Semantic Web Web Ontology Language (OWL) Library and information science Continuing education Open-source (Semi) automatic metadata Metadata generator Linked Data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Park, J.R., Tosaka, Y., Maszaros, S., Lu, C.: From Metadata Creation to Metadata Quality Control: Continuing Education Needs Among Cataloging and Metadata Professionals. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science 51(3), 158–176 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tosaka, Y., Park, J.R.: RDA Training and Continuing Education Needs: Perspectives of Cataloging and Metadata Professionals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 64(4), 651–662 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vellucci, S.L., Hsieh-Yee, I., Moen, W.E.: The Metadata Education and Research Information Commons (MERIC): A Collaborative Teaching and Research Initiative. Education for Information 25(3/4), 169–179 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinkston, J.: Wanted: A revolution in library continuing education. Public Library Quarterly 28(4), 295–311 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park, J.R., Brenza, A.: Evaluation of (Semi)Automatic Metadata Generation Tools: A Survey of the Current State of the Art. Information Technology and Libraries 34(3) (2015). doi: 10.6017/ital.v34i3.5889
  6. 6.
    Dobreva, M., Kim, Y., Ross, S.: Designing an automated prototype tool for preservation quality metadata extraction for ingest into digital repository. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies 2008. Information and Communication Technologies and the Knowledge Economy Series, vol. 5. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenberg, J., Spurgin, K., Crystal, A.: Final Report for the AMeGA (Automatic Metadata Generation Applications) Project. Technical report, Library of Congress (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polfreman, M., Broughton, V., Wilson, A.:Metadata Generation for Resource Discovery. Joint Information Systems Committee (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deng, S., Reese, T.: Customized Mapping and Metadata Transfer from DSpace to OCLC to Improve ETD Work Flow. New Library World 110(5/6), 249–264 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurtz, M.: Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories. Information Technology and Libraries 29(1), 40–46 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walsh, M.P.: Batch Loading Collections into DSpace: Using Perl Scripts for Automation and Quality Control. Information Technology and Libraries 29(3), 117–127 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Green, R., Dolphin, I., Awre, C., Sherratt, R.: The RepoMMan Project: Automating Workflow and Metadata for an Institutional Repository. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives 23(2), 210–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Devaul, H., Diekema, A.R., Ostwald, J.: Computer-Assisted Assignment of Educational Standards Using Natural Language Processing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(2), 395–405 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations