Advertisement

Evaluation of Fatigue Measurement Using Human Motor Coordination for Gesture-Based Interaction in 3D Environments

  • Neera Pradhan
  • Angela BenavidesEmail author
  • Qin Zhu
  • Amy Ulinski Banic
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9475)

Abstract

Benefits of immersive three-dimensional (3D) applications are enhanced by effective 3D interaction techniques. While gesture-based interaction provides benefits in these types of environments users commonly report higher fatigue than with other interaction solutions. Typically, fatigue is measured subjectively but may lack precision, consistency and depth. Our research proposes a novel, more consistent and predictable measure of fatigue. This paper presents the details of our technique based on human motor coordination, the results of an experimental study on gesture-based interaction, identifies attributing causes for fatigue and outlines design guidelines to reduce fatigue for gesture-based interaction techniques. These results have implications for gesture-based or mid-air interaction techniques for 3D environments, such as virtual environments and immersive visualizations.

Keywords

Hand Gesture Coordination Pattern Screen Display Effort Demand Display Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, S.S., Chae, J., Kim, H., Lim, Y.k., Lee, K.p.: Towards more natural digital content manipulation via user freehand gestural interaction in a living room. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2013, pp. 617–626. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baudel, T., Beaudouin-Lafon, M.: Charade: remote control of objects using free-hand gestures. Commun. ACM 36, 28–35 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J.C., Kassell, N.F.: A survey of design issues in spatial input. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 1994, pp. 213–222. ACM, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wikipedia: Borg scale – wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2015). [Accessed 26 August 2015]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung, M.K., Lee, I., Kee, D., Kim, S.H.: A postural workload evaluation system based on a macro-postural classification. Hum. Fact. Ergonomics Manuf. Serv. Ind. 12, 267–277 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kölsch, M., Beall, A.C., Turk, M.: The postural comfort zone for reaching gestures. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergonomics Soc. Ann. Meet. 47, 787–791 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Binder-Macleod, S.A., Snyder-Mackler, L.: Muscle fatigue: clinical implications for fatigue assessment and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Phys. Ther. 73, 902–910 (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bartlett, R.: Introduction to Sports Biomechanics. E & FN Spon, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamill, J., Haddad, J.M., McDermott, W.J.: Issues in quantifying variability from a dynamical systems perspective. J. Appl. Biomech. 16, 407–418 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glazier, P., Davids, K., Bartlett, R.: Dynamical systems theory: a relevant framework for performance-oriented sports biomechanics research. Sportscience 7, 85–92 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dierks, T.A., Davis, I.: Discrete and continuous joint coupling relationships in uninjured recreational runners. Clin. Biomech. 22, 581–591 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huffenus, A.F., Amarantini, D., Forestier, N.: Effects of distal and proximal arm muscles fatigue on multi-joint movement organization. Exp. Brain Res. 170, 438–447 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    NaturalPoint, I.: (Optitrack). http://www.optitrack.com/. [Accessed 25 August 2015]
  14. 14.
    Systems, C.G.: (Cyber glove ii). [Accessed 25 August 2015]Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kreylos, O.: (Vrui vr toolkit (vrui)). http://idav.ucdavis.edu/okreylos/ResDev/Vrui/. [Accessed 25 August 2015]
  16. 16.
    OptiTrack: (Natnet sdk). http://www.optitrack.com/products/natnet-sdk/. [Accessed 25 August 2015]
  17. 17.
    Systems, C.: (Virtualhand sdk). http://www.cyberglovesystems.com/products/virtual-hand-sdk/overview. [Accessed 25 August 2015]
  18. 18.
    Solutions, P.: (Understanding planes and axes). http://www.physical-solutions.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Understanding-Planes-and-Axes-of-Movement.pdf. [Accessed 25 August 2015]
  19. 19.
    Panjabi, M.M., Goel, V., Oxland, T., Takata, K., Duranceau, J., Krag, M., Price, M.: Human lumbar vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17, 299–306 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neera Pradhan
    • 1
  • Angela Benavides
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qin Zhu
    • 1
  • Amy Ulinski Banic
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Idaho National LaboratoryIdaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations