Advertisement

Enhancing Top-Down Solving with Widening and Narrowing

  • Kalmer Apinis
  • Helmut Seidl
  • Vesal Vojdani
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9560)

Abstract

We present an enhancement of the generic fixpoint algorithm TD which can deal with widening and narrowing even for non-monotonic systems of equations. In contrast to corresponding enhancements proposed for other standard fixpoint algorithms, no extra priorities on variables are required. Still, a mechanism can be devised so that occurrences of the widening/narrowing operator are inserted as well as removed dynamically.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no 269335 and from the German Science Foundation (DFG). This work was funded by institutional research grant IUT2-1 from the Estonian Research Council.

References

  1. 1.
    Amato, G., Scozzari, F.: Localizing widening and narrowing. In: Logozzo, F., Fähndrich, M. (eds.) Static Analysis. LNCS, vol. 7935, pp. 25–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amato, G., Scozzari, F., Seidl, H., Apinis, K., Vojdani, V.: Efficiently intertwining widening and narrowing (2015). arXiv:1503.00883 [cs.PL]
  3. 3.
    Apinis, K., Seidl, H., Vojdani, V.: Side-effecting constraint systems: a Swiss army knife for program analysis. In: Jhala, R., Igarashi, A. (eds.) APLAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7705, pp. 157–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apinis, K.: Frameworks for analyzing multi-threaded C, Ph.D. thesis, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Apinis, K., Seidl, H., Vojdani, V.: How to combine widening and narrowing for non-monotonic systems of equations. In: 34th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pp. 377–386. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourdoncle, F.: Interprocedural abstract interpretation of block structured languages with nested procedures, aliasing and recursivity. In: Deransart, P., Małuszyński, J. (eds.) PLILP 1990. LNCS, vol. 456. Springer, Heidelberg (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Static determination of dynamic properties of programs. In: Robinet, B. (ed.) 2nd International Symposium on Programming, Paris, pp. 106–130. Dunod (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: 4th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 238–252. ACM Press (1977)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Static determination of dynamic properties of recursive procedures. In: IFIP Conference on Formal Description of Programming Concepts, pp. 237–277. North-Holland (1977)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Systematic design of program analysis frameworks. In: Aho, A.V., Zilles, S.N., Rosen, B.K. (eds.) 6th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 269–282 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cousot, P., Halbwachs, N.: Automatic discovery of linear restraints among variables of a program. In: 5th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 84–96. ACM Press (1978)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fecht, C., Seidl, H.: Propagating differences: an efficient new fixpoint algorithm for distributive constraint systems. Nord. J. Comput. 5(4), 304–329 (1998)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fecht, C., Seidl, H.: A faster solver for general systems of equations. Sci. Comput. Program. 35(2), 137–161 (1999)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hermenegildo, M., Puebla, G., Marriott, K., Stuckey, P.: Incremental analysis of constraint logic programs. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. (TOPLAS) 22(2), 187–223 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hermenegildo, M.V., Puebla, G., Bueno, F., López-García, P.: Integrated program debugging, verification, and optimization using abstract interpretation (and the Ciao System preprocessor). Sci. Comput. Program. 58(1), 115–140 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hofmann, M., Karbyshev, A., Seidl, H.: Verifying a local generic solver in Coq. In: Cousot, R., Martel, M. (eds.) SAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6337, pp. 340–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hofmann, M., Karbyshev, A., Seidl, H.: What is a pure functional? In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) ICALP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6199, pp. 199–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kildall, G.A.: A unified approach to global program optimization. In: ACM Symposium on Principle of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 194–206. ACM (1973)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Le Charlier, B., Van Hentenryck, P.: A universal top-down fixpoint algorithm. Technical report 92–22, Institute of Computer Science, University of Namur, Belgium (1992)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miné, A.: The octagon abstract domain. Higher-Order Symb. Comput. 19(1), 31–100 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muthukumar, K., Hermenegildo, M.: Deriving a fixpoint computation algorithm for top-down abstract interpretation of logic programs. Technical report ACT-DC-153-90, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC), Austin, TX 78759 (1990)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Puebla, G., Hermenegildo, M.: Optimized algorithms for the incremental analysis of logic programs. In: Cousot, R., Schmidt, D.A. (eds.) SAS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1145. Springer, Heidelberg (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seidl, H., Fecht, C.: Interprocedural analyses: a comparison. J. Log. Program. 43(2), 123–156 (2000)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vojdani, V.: Static data race analysis of heap-manipulating C programs, Ph.D. thesis, University of Tartu, (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deptartment of Computer ScienceUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl für Informatik IITechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations