Advertisement

Phenomenology of Experiential Sharing: The Contribution of Schutz and Walther

  • Felipe LeónEmail author
  • Dan Zahavi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality book series (SIPS, volume 6)

Abstract

The chapter explores the topic of experiential sharing by drawing on the early contributions of the phenomenologists Alfred Schutz and Gerda Walther. It is argued that both Schutz and Walther support, from complementary perspectives, an approach to experiential sharing that has tended to be overlooked in current debates. This approach highlights specific experiential interrelations taking place among individuals who are jointly engaged and located in a common environment, and situates this type of sharing within a broader and richer spectrum of sharing phenomena. Whereas Schutz’ route to the sharing of experiences describes the latter as a pre-reflective interlocking of individual streams of experiences, arising from a reciprocal Thou-orientation, Walther provides a textured account of different types of sharing and correlated forms of communities.

Keywords

Collective intentionality Shared experiences Alfred Schutz Gerda Walther 

References

  1. Bratman, M. 1999. Faces of intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratman, M. 2014. Shared agency. A planning theory of acting together. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caminada, E. 2014. Joining the background. Habitual sentiments behind we-intentionality. In Institutions, emotions and group agents. Contributions to social ontology, ed. A. Konzelmann-Ziv and H.-B. Schmid. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, D. 1987. Personalities of a higher order. In Interpreting Husserl: Critical and comparative studies. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eilan, N., C. Hoerl, T. McCormack, and J. Roessler (eds.). 2005. Joint attention: communication and other minds. Issues in philosophy and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, S. 2008. Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition 17(2008): 535–543.Google Scholar
  7. Gallotti, M., and Frith, C. 2013. Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Science 17(4): 160—165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, M. 1989. On social facts. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, M. 2014. Joint commitment. How we make the social world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gurwitsch, A. 2012 [1931]. Die mitmenschlichen Begegnungen in der Milieuwelt. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, E. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, E. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krueger, J. 2012. Seeing mind in action. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. León, F. 2013. Experiential other-directness: To what does it amount? Tidsskrift for Medier, Erkendelse og Formidling 1(1): 21–38.Google Scholar
  15. Meijers, A. 2003. Can collective intentionality be individualized? American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62: 167–183.Google Scholar
  16. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2002 [1945]. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routlegdge.Google Scholar
  17. Overgaard, S. 2012. Other People. In The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology, ed. D. Zahavi, 460–479. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pacherie, E. 2007. Is collective intentionality really primitive? In Mental processes: Representing and inferring, ed. M. Beaney, C. Penco, and M. Vignolo, 153–175. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pacherie, E. 2011. The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. Joint-agency. In Joint attention. New developments in psychology, philosophy of mind and social neuroscience, ed. A. Seemann, 343–389. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pacherie, E. 2014. How does it feel to act together? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13(1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pettit, P., and List, C. 2011. Group agency. The possibility, design and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rakoczy, H. 2008. Collective intentionality and uniquely human cognition. In Learning from animals? Examining the nature of human uniqueness, ed. E. Neumann-Held and L. Röska-Hardy. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rovane, C. 1998. The bounds of agency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Scheler, M. 2008 [1913/1923]. The nature of sympathy. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
  25. Schlossberger, M. 2005. Die Erfahrung des Anderen. Gefühle im menschlichen Miteinander. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmid, H.-B. 2009. Plural action. Essays in philosophy and social science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Schmid, H.-B. 2012. Wir-Intentionalität. Kritik des ontologischen Individualismus und Rekonstruktion der Gemeinschaft. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  28. Schmid, H.-B. 2013. Trying to act together. The structure and role of trust in joint action. In The background of social reality, ed. M. Schmitz, B. Kobow, and H.-B. Schmid. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schutz, A. 1967 [1932]. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schweikard, D. and Schmid, H.-B. 2013. Collective intentionality. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. Zalta (Summer 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/collective-intentionality/. Accessed 14 Oct 2014.
  31. Searle, J. 1990. Collective intentions and actions. In Intentions in communication, ed. P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M.E. Pollack. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Searle, J. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Searle, J. 2010. Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seemann, A. 2009. Joint agency: Intersubjectivity, sense of control and the feeling of trust. Inquiry 52(5): 500–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seemann, A. (ed.). 2011. Joint attention. New developments in psychology, Philosophy of mind and social neuroscience. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, J. 2010. Seeing other people. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXI (3): 731–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stein. E. 2010a [1917]. Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Band 5. Freiburg i. B.: Herder.Google Scholar
  38. Stein. E. 2010b [1922]. Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychologie und der Geisteswissenschaften. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Band 6. Freiburg i. B.: Herder.Google Scholar
  39. Tollefsen, D. 2004. Collective intentionality. In Internet encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. J. Fieser and B. Dowden. http://www.iep.utm.edu/coll-int/. Accessed 14 Oct 2014.
  40. Tollefsen, D. 2014. A dynamic theory of shared intention and the phenomenology of joint action. In From individual to collective intentionality: New essays, ed. R. Chant, F. Hindrinks, and G. Preyer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll, H. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675–735.Google Scholar
  42. von Hildebrand, D.1975 [1930]. Metaphysik der Gemeinschaft. Untersuchungen über Wesen und Wert der Gemeinschaft. Regensburg: Verlag Josef Habbel.Google Scholar
  43. von Scheve, C., and Salmela, M. (eds.). 2014. Collective emotions. Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Walther, G. 1922. Ein Beitrag zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften. Mit einem Anhang zur Phänomenologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften. Halle a. d. S: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  45. Zahavi, D. 2011. Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2(3): 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zahavi, D. 2014. Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zahavi, D. 2015. You, me and we: The sharing of emotional experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22/1–2: 84–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Subjectivity ResearchUniversity of CopenhagenKøbenhavnDenmark

Personalised recommendations