Functional Architectures for Complex Behaviors: Analysis and Modeling of Interacting Processes in a Hierarchy of Time Scales

  • Dionysios Perdikis
  • Raoul Huys
  • Viktor Jirsa
Conference paper
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)


Synergetics’ applications in the sciences of cognition and behavior have focused on instabilities leading to phase transitions between competing behavioral or perceptual patterns. Inspired by this scientific tradition, functional architectures are proposed as a general theoretical framework aiming at modeling the nonstationary, multiscale dynamics of complex behaviors, beyond the neighborhood of instabilities. Such architectures consist of interacting dynamical processes, operating in a hierarchy of time scales and functionally differentiated according to their mutual time scale separations. Here, the mathematical formalism of functional architectures is presented and exemplified through simulations of cursive handwriting. Then, the implications for the analysis of complex behaviors are discussed.


Functional architectures Structure flows on manifolds Hierarchies of time scales 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jirsa, V.K., Kelso, J.A.S.: The excitator as a minimal model for the coordination dynamics of discrete and rhythmic movement generation. Journal of Motor Behavior 37, 35–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huys, R., Studenka, B.E., Rheaume, N.L., Zelaznik, H.N., Jirsa, V.K.: Distinct timing mechanisms produce discrete and continuous movements. PLoS Computational Biology 4, e1000061 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haken, H.: Synergetics: Introduction and advanced topics. Springer, Berlin (1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haken, H.: Principles of Brain Functioning: A Synergetic Approach to Brain Activity Behavior and Cognition. Springer, Berlin (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haken, H.: Synergetic computers and cognition: A top-down approach to neural nets. Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perdikis, D., Huys, R., Jirsa, V.K.: Complex Processes from Dynamical Architectures with Time-Scale Hierarchy. PLoS ONE 6, e16589 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perdikis, D., Huys, R., Jirsa, V.K.: Time scale hierarchies in the functional organization of complex behaviors. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002198 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jirsa, V.K., Huys, R., Pillai, A.S., Perdikis, D., Woodman, M.: Connectivity and dynamics of neural information processing. In: Rabinovich, M.I., Friston, K.J., Varona, P. (eds.) Principles of Brain Dynamics: Global State Interactions, pp. 209–232. MIT Press, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pillai, A.S.: Structured Flows on Manifolds: Distributed Functional Architectures. PhD thesis. Florida Atlantic University (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Constantin, P., Foias, C., Nicolaenko, B., Teman, R.: Intergral manifolds and inertial manifolds for dissipative partial differential equations. Springer, Berlin (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Mourik, A.M., Daffertshofer, A., Beek, P.J.: Estimating KramersMoyal coefficients in short and non-stationary data sets. Physics Letters A 351, 13–17 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Theoretical Neuroscience Group, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Inserm, UMR1106Aix-Marseille Université,Faculté de MédecineMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations