Virtual Environment for Creative and Collaborative Learning

  • Anna Bilyatdinova
  • Andrey Karsakov
  • Alexey Bezgodov
  • Alexey Dukhanov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 416)

Abstract

New guidelines for Russian technical universities and creative industries require competitive professionals and as a result we are urged to apply novel educational methods to make their training efficient. This tendency calls for new tools to be adopted and implemented in the learning purposes. Russian modern curriculum is based on three levels of desirable exit qualifications students need to develop—Hard Skills, Soft Skills and Professional competencies in a specialized field. Novel not only in content but also in form Elective courses in Scientific Visualization, and Virtual Reality of Double Degree Master’s Program in Computational Science (ITMO University, Russian Federation and University of Amsterdam (UvA), The Netherlands) incorporate 3D anatomical atlas of human body, which became a prototype for the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). In this paper, we describe VLE architecture and our experience of its introduction to the master program courses and master theses preparation. We use our flexible VLE to acquire knowledge, develop collaborative skills, and monitor knowledge acquisition within the same unified environment using varied methods.

Keywords

Virtual reality Virtual environment Curriculum design Learning competence 

References

  1. 1.
    Berns, A., Gonzalez-Pardo, A., Camacho, D.: Game-like language learning in 3-D virtual environments. Comput. Educ. 60, 210–220 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bezgodov, A., Esin, D.: Complex network modeling for maritime search and rescue operations. Procedia Comput. Sci. 29, 2325–2335 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilyatdinova, A., Karsakov, A., Bezgodov, A., Dukhanov, A.: Virtual environment for creative and collaborative learning. KICSS’2014 Proceedings, pp. 313–320 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosch-Sijtsema, P.M., Haapamäki, J.: Perceived enablers of 3D virtual environments for virtual team learning and innovation. Comput. Human Behav. 37, 395–401 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brenton, H., Hernandez, J., Bello, F.: Using multimedia and Web3D to enhance anatomy teaching. Comput. Educ. 49, 32–53 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chau, M., Wong, A., Wang, M., Lai, S.: Using 3D virtual environments to facilitate students in constructivist learning. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 115–121 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalgarno, B.: The potential of 3D virtual learning environments: a constructivist analysis. Electron. J. Instr. Sci. Technol. 1–19 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.: Exploring the relationship between afforded learning tasks and learning benefits in 3D virtual learning environments. In: Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeLaurier, A., Burton, N.: The Mouse Limb Anatomy Atlas: an interactive 3D tool for studying embryonic limb patterning. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 83 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D.K., Synteta, P.: Virtual learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Hellenic Conference “Information & Communication Technologies in Education”, pp. 3–18 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dukhanov, A.V., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Bilyatdinova, A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Sloot, P.M.: Double-degree Master’s Program in computational science: experiences of ITMO University and University of Amsterdam. Procedia Comput. Sci. 29, 1433–1445 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grenfell, J.: Immersive interfaces for art education teaching and learning in virtual and real world learning environments. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 93, 1198–1211 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hacker, S., Handels, H.: A framework for representation and visualization of 3D shape variability of organs in an interactive anatomical atlas. Methods Inf. Med. 48, 272–281 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamrol, A., Górski, F., Grajewski, D., Zawadzki, P.: Virtual 3D Atlas of a human body-development of an educational medical software application. Procedia Comput. Sci. 25, 302–314 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsu, L.: Web 3D simulation-based application in tourism education: a case study with Second Life. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 11, 113–124 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    John, N.: The impact of Web3D technologies on medical education and training. Comput. Educ. 49, 19–31 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Land, S. Van Der, Schouten, A.: Lost in space? Cognitive fit and cognitive load in 3D virtual environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1054–1064 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lorenzo, G., Pomares, J., Lledó, A.: Inclusion of immersive virtual learning environments and visual control systems to support the learning of students with Asperger syndrome. Comput. Educ. 62, 88–101 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loureiro, A., Bettencourt, T.: The use of virtual environments as an extended classroom—a case study with adult learners in tertiary education. Procedia Technol. 13, 97–106 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu, J., Pan, Z., Lin, H., Zhang, M., Shi, J.: Virtual learning environment for medical education based on VRML and VTK. Comput. Graph. 29, 283–288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mikropoulos, T., Bellou, J.: The unique features of educational virtual environments. Proc. e-society 122–128 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mikropoulos, T., Natsis, A.: Educational virtual environments: a ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Comput. Educ. 56, 769–780 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parsons, S., Leonard, A., Mitchell, P.: Virtual environments for social skills training: comments from two adolescents with autistic spectrum disorder. Comput. Educ. 47, 186–206 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidt, M., Laffey, J., Schmidt, C.: Developing methods for understanding social behavior in a 3D virtual learning environment. Comput. Human Behav. 28, 405–413 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Semradova, I., Hubackova, S.: Learning strategies and the possibilities of virtual learning environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 83, 313–317 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Semradova, I., Hubackova, S.: Virtual learning environment and the development of communicative competences. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 89, 450–453 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simkova, M., Stepanek, J.: Effective use of virtual learning environment and LMS. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 83, 497–500 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zagarskikh, A., Karsakov, A., Tchurov, T.: The framework for problem solving environments in urban science. Procedia Comput. Sci. 29, 2483–2495 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Bilyatdinova
    • 1
  • Andrey Karsakov
    • 1
  • Alexey Bezgodov
    • 1
  • Alexey Dukhanov
    • 1
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations