Electronic Democracy in Europe: An Introduction



With the rise of the WWW as a platform for mass media, the question of the Internet’s potential to change politics and democratic decision-making quickly captured the attention of many researchers and practitioners. Despite an impressive body of literature and numerous experiences with the political dimension of the new media technologies, there are still many uncertainties regarding the interplay of the Internet and political processes in contemporary representative democracies. What is more, the specific challenges of electronic democracy related to the unique institutional makeup and governance processes of the European Union remain uncharted territory.

As this book focuses on the intersection of electronic democracy and European politics, the introduction to “Electronic Democracy in Europe” provides a concise overview of the debate on the Internet’s potential to change democratic politics, thereby contextualizing the discussion within fundamental normative views of the democratic process. With regard to the European dimension, this chapter also sets the stage for the ensuing parts of the book by describing relevant trends in European governance. These developments are discussed in terms of their enabling and constraining influence on electronic democracy at European level. The chapter closes with a brief outline of the three parts of the book—e-public, e-participation and e-voting.


  1. Alexander, C. J., & Pal, L. A. (Eds.). (1998). Digital democracy: Policy and politics in the wired world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anduiza, E., Jensen, M. J., & Jorba, L. (Eds.). (2012). Digital media and political engagement worldwide. A comparative study. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, B. (1998). Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baringhorst, S., Kneip, V., & Niesyto, J. (Eds.). (2009). Political campaigning on the web. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar
  5. Benz, A., & Dose, N. (Eds.). (2010). Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blais, A. (2010). Political participation. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing democracies. Elections and voting in the 21st century (pp. 165–183). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budge, I. (1996). The new challenge of direct democracy. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burnett, R., & Marshall, P. D. (2003). Web theory. An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship. Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, S., & Shane, P. M. (2012). Connecting democracy. Online consultation and the flow of political communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). European governance. A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  13. Commission of the European Union. (2006). White paper on a European communication policy. COM (2006) 35 final version, Brussels.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlgren, P. (2013). The political web: Media, participation and alternative democracy. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, R. (2013). Politics online: Blogs, chat rooms, and discussion groups in American democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Degele, N. (2002). Einführung in die Techniksoziologie. München, Germany: Fink.Google Scholar
  17. Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved: Participation, deliberation and social movements. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Diedrichs, U., Reiners, W., & Wessels, W. (2011). The dynamics of change in EU governance. In U. Diedrichs, W. Reiners, & W. Wessels (Eds.), The dynamics of change in EU governance (pp. 1–20). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downes, E., & McMillan, S. (2000). Defining interactivity. A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2(2), 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dutton, W. (2014). Politics and the Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Emmer, M., Vowe, G., Wolling, J., & Seifert, M. (2011). Bürger online. Die Entwicklung der politischen Online-Kommunikation in Deutschland. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.Google Scholar
  22. EU—European Union. (2010, March 30). Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 53.Google Scholar
  23. Finke, B. (2007). Civil society participation in EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 2(2).Google Scholar
  24. Gasser, U., Thurmann, J. M., Stäuber, R., & Gerlach, J. (Eds.). (2010). E-democracy in Switzerland: Practice and perspectives. Zürich, Switzerland: Dike.Google Scholar
  25. Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the Internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibson, R. K., Römmele, A., & Ward, S. J. (Eds.). (2004). Electronic democracy. Mobilisation, organization and participation via new ICTs. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Grande, E. (2012). Governance-Forschung in der Governance-Falle?—Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 53(4), 565–592.Google Scholar
  28. Grofman, B., Trechsel, A. H., & Franklin, M. (Eds.). (2014). The Internet and democracy in global perspective: Voters, candidates, parties, and social movements. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Grossman, L. (1995). The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. (1977). Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. Hacker, K. L., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (Eds.). (2000). Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Hague, B. N., & Loader, B. D. (Eds.). (2005). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Heinelt, H. (1998). Zivilgesellschaftliche Perspektiven einer demokratischen Transformation der Europäischen Union. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 5(1), 79–107.Google Scholar
  34. Héritier, A., & Rhodes, M. (Eds.). (2011). New modes of governance in Europe. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hoff, J. (2000). Technology and social change. The path between technological determinism, social constructivism and new institutionalism. In J. Hoff, I. Horrocks, & P. Tops (Eds.), Democratic governance and new technology. Technologically mediated innovations in political practice in Western Europe (pp. 13–22). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurrelmann, A., Schneider, S., & Steffek, J. (Eds.). (2007). Legitimacy in an age of global politics. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Jachtenfuchs, M., & Kohler-Koch, B. (Eds.). (2003). Europäische integration. Stuttgart, Germany: UTB.Google Scholar
  40. Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 42–62). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and meta-governance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 106–116). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kersting, N. (Ed.). (2012). Electronic democracy. Opladen, Germany: Budrich.Google Scholar
  43. Kies, R., & Nanz, P. (2013). Introduction. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us? Success and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 1–14). Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Kö, A., Leitner, C., Leitold, H., & Prosser, A. (Eds.). (2013). Technology-enabled innovation for democracy, government and governance. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Kohler-Koch, B. (2013a). Civil society and democracy in the EU. High expectations under empirical scrutiny. In B. Kohler-Koch & C. Quittkat (Eds.), De-mystification of participatory democracy. EU governance and civil society (pp. 1–17). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kohler-Koch, B. (2013b). Civil society participation: More democracy or pluralization of the European Lobby? In B. Kohler-Koch & C. Quittkat (Eds.), De-mystification of participatory democracy. EU governance and civil society (pp. 173–191). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). Review article: The ‘governance turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Lange, P., Driessen, P. P. J., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., & Burger, P. (2013). Governing towards sustainability—Conceptualizing modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15(3), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee, C. W., McQuarrie, M., & Walker, E. T. (Eds.). (2015). Democratizing inequalities: Dilemmas of the new public participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lindner, R. (2005). Internetkommunikation zum Abbau von Demokratie- und Legitimitätsdefiziten? In Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (ZParl), 4, 823–838.Google Scholar
  52. Lindner, R. (2007). Politischer Wandel durch digitale Netzwerkkommunikation? Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Mayntz, R. (2005). Governance theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? In G. V. Schuppert (Ed.), Governance-Forschung. Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien (pp. 11–20). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
  54. Mayntz, R. (2010). Legitimacy and compliance in transnational governance (MPIfG Working paper 10/5). Retrieved September 7, 2015, from http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/3011/Google Scholar
  55. Mendez, F., & Trechsel, A. (2005). The European Union and e-voting: Upgrading Euro-elections. In A. Trechsel & F. Mendez (Eds.), The European Union and e-voting. Addressing the European Parliament’s Internet voting challenge (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Nanz, P. (2007). Multiple voices: An interdiscursive concept of the European sphere. In Fossum, J. E., Schlesinger, P., and Kvaerk, G. (Eds.), Public sphere and civil society? Transformations of the European Union (ARENA Report No. 2, pp. 11–28).Google Scholar
  57. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  58. Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norris, P. (2004). Will new technology boost turnout? In N. Kersting & H. Baldersheim (Eds.), Electronic voting and democracy: A comparative analysis (pp. 193–225). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1997). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17–50). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  62. Rössler, P. (1998). Wirkungsmodelle: die digitale Herausforderung. Überlegungen zu einer Inventur bestehender Erklärungsansätze der Medienwirkungsforschung. In P. Rössler (Ed.), Online-Kommunikation. Beiträge zu Nutzung und Wirkung (pp. 17–46). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saurugger, S. (2010). The social construction of the participatory turn: The emergence of a norm in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scolve, R. (1995). Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sholle, D. (2002). Disorganizing the ‘New Technology’. In G. Elmer (Ed.), Critical perspectives on the Internet (pp. 3–26). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  66. Skocpol, T. (1999). Advocates without members: The recent transformation of American civil life. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 461–509). Washington, DC: Brookings Inst Press.Google Scholar
  67. Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. (1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1–23). Washington, DC: Brookings Inst Press.Google Scholar
  68. Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Shifting inequalities: Patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation. European Societies, 13(1), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Treaty of Lisbon. (2007, December 17). Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community (2007/c 306/01). Official Journal of the European Union, 50.Google Scholar
  70. van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Voss, K. (Ed.). (2014). Internet und Partizipation. Bottom-up oder Top-down? Politische Beteiligungsmöglichkeiten im Internet. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Zittel, T., & Fuchs, D. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory democracy and political participation. Can participatory engineering bring citizens back in. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Lindner
    • 1
  • Georg Aichholzer
    • 2
  • Leonhard Hennen
    • 3
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA), Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)BonnGermany

Personalised recommendations