Abstract
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients exhibit complex and highly variable behavior, making them very difficult to manage efficiently and safely. More pragmatically, the cost of intensive care in healthcare systems has dramatically risen over the last decades mostly because of patient ageing. The next generation and challenge for ICU care is thus to personalize and improve care to manage inter- and intra-patient variability and improve cost and productivity. Defeating ‘one size fits all’ protocolized approaches and moving to a ‘one method fits all’ personalized approach could provide the big step forward required to handle the demographic tsunami and rising costs.
Computer models offer one powerful opportunity to personalize care by using clinical data and system identification methods to create a so-called ‘virtual patient’ representing the patient in a particular state. This approach relies on identifying patient-specific parameters that are time varying, capture inter- and intra-patient variability, and are not a function of the therapeutic inputs. Such ‘sensitivities’ are the key to unlocking virtual patients and model-based care. Thus, the approach predefines the type of deterministic physiological models used. These models have a long history in physiological studies, but a much shorter one in clinical studies. However, over the last 10 years, the successful design and implementation of model-based sensors or decision support systems [1, 2] has demonstrated the potential of this approach to provide personalized solutions for ICU patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chase JG, Le Compte AJ, Preiser JC, Shaw GM, Penning S, Desaive T (2011) Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? Ann Intensive Care 1:11
Dong Y, Chbat NW, Gupta A, Hadzikadic M, Gajic O (2012) Systems modeling and simulation applications for critical care medicine. Ann Intensive Care 2:18
Vincent JL (2010) We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 38(10 Suppl):S534–S538
Kovatchev BP, Breton M, Man CD, Cobelli C (2009) In silico preclinical trials: a proof of concept in closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 3:44–55
Carson ER, Cobelli C (2001) Modelling Methodology For Physiology And Medicine. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Keener JP, Sneyd J (1998) Mathematical Physiology. Springer, New York
Hunter P, Coveney PV, de Bono B et al (2010) A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human in 2010 and beyond. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 368:2595–2614
Tawhai MH, Burrowes KS, Hoffman EA (2006) Computational models of structure-function relationships in the pulmonary circulation and their validation. Exp Physiol 91:285–293
Chiew YS, Pretty C, Docherty PD et al (2015) Time-varying respiratory system elastance: a physiological model for patients who are spontaneously breathing. PLoS One 10:e0114847
Lin J, Razak NN, Pretty CG et al (2011) A physiological Intensive Control Insulin-Nutrition-Glucose (ICING) model validated in critically ill patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 102:192–205
Hann CE, Chase JG, Lin J, Lotz T, Doran CV, Shaw GM (2005) Integral-based parameter identification for long-term dynamic verification of a glucose-insulin system model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 77:259–270
Chase JG, Suhaimi F, Penning S et al (2010) Validation of a model-based virtual trials method for tight glycemic control in intensive care. Biomed Eng Online 9:84
Chase JG, Le Compte AJ, Suhaimi F et al (2011) Tight glycemic control in critical care. The leading role of insulin sensitivity and patient variability: A review and model-based analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 102:156–171
Lin J, Lee D, Chase JG et al (2008) Stochastic modelling of insulin sensitivity and adaptive glycemic control for critical care. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 89:141–152
van Drunen VE, Chiew YS, Zhao Z et al (2013) Visualisation of time-variant respiratory system elastance in ARDS models. Biomed Tech (Berl) 58(Suppl 1):4328
Chiew YS, Chase JG, Shaw GM, Sundaresan A, Desaive T (2011) Model-based PEEP optimisation in mechanical ventilation. Biomed Eng Online 10:111
Wernerman J, Desaive T, Finfer S et al (2014) Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting. Crit Care 18:226
Aragon D (2006) Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control. Am J Crit Care 15:370–377
Pretty C, Chase JG, Lin J et al (2011) Impact of glucocorticoids on insulin resistance in the critically ill. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 102:172–180
Pretty C, Chase JG, Le Compte A, Lin J, Shaw G (2011) Impact of metoprolol on insulin sensitivity in the ICU. Trauma 4:4
Pretty CG, Le Compte AJ, Chase JG et al (2012) Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control. Ann Intensive Care 2:17
Sah PA, Chase JG, Pretty CG et al (2014) Evolution of insulin sensitivity and its variability in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with hypothermia. Crit Care 18:586
Ferenci T, Benyo B, Kovacs L, Fisk L, Shaw GM, Chase JG (2013) Daily evolution of insulin sensitivity variability with respect to diagnosis in the critically ill. PloS one 8:e57119
Lin J, Parente JD, Chase JG et al (2011) Development of a model-based clinical sepsis biomarker for critically ill patients. Comp Methods Programs Biomed 102:149–155
van Drunen EJ, Chase JG, Chiew YS, Shaw GM, Desaive T (2013) Analysis of different model-based approaches for estimating dFRC for real-time application. Biomed Eng Online 12:9
Chiew YS, Chase JG, Lambermont B et al (2013) Effects of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) levels in non-invasive ventilated patients: titrating NAVA levels with electric diaphragmatic activity and tidal volume matching. Biomed Eng Online 12:61
van Drunen EJ, Chiew YS, Chase JG et al (2013) Expiratory model-based method to monitor ARDS disease state. Biomed Eng Online 12:57
Pielmeier U, Andreassen S, Juliussen B, Chase JG, Nielsen BS, Haure P (2010) The Glucosafe system for tight glycemic control in critical care: a pilot evaluation study. J Crit Care 25:97–104
Plank J, Blaha J, Cordingley J et al (2006) Multicentric, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate blood glucose control by the model predictive control algorithm versus routine glucose management protocols in intensive care unit patients. Diabetes Care 29:271–276
Van Herpe T, Mesotten D, Wouters PJ et al (2013) LOGIC-insulin algorithm-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control during critical illness: The LOGIC-1 single-center randomized, controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care 36:189–194
Evans A, Le Compte A, Tan CS et al (2012) Stochastic targeted (STAR) Glycemic control: design, safety, and performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:102–115
Fisk L, Lecompte A, Penning S, Desaive T, Shaw G, Chase G (2012) STAR Development and Protocol Comparison. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:3357–3364
Le Compte AJ, Chase JG, Lynn A, Hann CE, Shaw GM, Lin J (2011) Development of blood glucose control for extremely premature infants. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 102:181–191
Lonergan T, LeCompte A, Willacy M et al (2006) A simple insulin-nutrition protocol for tight glycemic control in critical illness: development and protocol comparison. Diabetes Technol Ther 8:191–206
Wilinska ME, Chassin L, Hovorka R (2008) In silico testing – impact on the progress of the closed loop insulin infusion for critically ill patients project. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2:417–423
Chase JG, Shaw GM, Lotz T et al (2007) Model-based insulin and nutrition administration for tight glycaemic control in critical care. Curr Drug Deliv 4:283–296
Le Compte AJ, Pretty CG, Lin J, Shaw GM, Lynn A, Chase JG (2011) Impact of variation in patient response on model-based control of glycaemia in critically ill patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 109:211–219
Pretty CG, Signal M, Fisk L et al (2014) Impact of sensor and measurement timing errors on model-based insulin sensitivity. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 114:e79–e86
Vincent JL, Hall JB, Slutsky AS (2015) Ten big mistakes in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 41:505–507
Van Herpe T, Pluymers B, Espinoza M, Van den Berghe G, De Moor B (2006) A minimal model for glycemia control in critically ill patients. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:5432–5435
Hovorka R, Chassin LJ, Ellmerer M, Plank J, Wilinska ME (2008) A simulation model of glucose regulation in the critically ill. Physiol Meas 29:959–978
Evans A, Shaw GM, Le Compte A et al (2011) Pilot proof of concept clinical trials of Stochastic Targeted (STAR) glycemic control. Ann Intensive Care 1:38
Lonergan T, Compte AL, Willacy M et al (2006) A pilot study of the SPRINT protocol for tight glycemic control in critically Ill patients. Diabetes Technol Ther 8:449–462
Pretty CG (2012) Analysis, classification and management of insulin sensitivity variability in a glucose-insulin system model for critical illness. http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/6580/thesis_fulltext.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed November 2015
Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S et al (2009) A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med 35:1738–1748
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chase, J.G., Desaive, T., Preiser, JC. (2016). Virtual Patients and Virtual Cohorts: A New Way to Think About the Design and Implementation of Personalized ICU Treatments. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2016. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27349-5_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27349-5_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27348-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27349-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)