International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization

Graph Drawing and Network Visualization pp 30-43 | Cite as

Drawing Large Graphs by Multilevel Maxent-Stress Optimization

  • Henning Meyerhenke
  • Martin Nöllenburg
  • Christian Schulz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9411)

Abstract

Drawing large graphs appropriately is an important step for the visual analysis of data from real-world networks. Here we present a novel multilevel algorithm to compute a graph layout with respect to a recently proposed metric that combines layout stress and entropy. As opposed to previous work, we do not solve the linear systems of the maxent-stress metric with a typical numerical solver. Instead we use a simple local iterative scheme within a multilevel approach. To accelerate local optimization, we approximate long-range forces and use shared-memory parallelism. Our experiments validate the high potential of our approach, which is particularly appealing for dynamic graphs. In comparison to the previously best maxent-stress optimizer, which is sequential, our parallel implementation is on average 30 times faster already for static graphs (and still faster if executed on one thread) while producing a comparable solution quality.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support by DFG is acknowledged (DFG grants ME 3619/3-1 and SA 933/10-1). We thank Yifan Hu for providing us the codes from [12].

References

  1. 1.
    Abello, J., van Ham, F., Krishnan, N.: ASK-GraphView: a large scale graph visualization system. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 12(5), 669–676 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bader, D.A., Meyerhenke, H., Sanders, P., Schulz, C., Kappes, A., Wagner, D.: A benchmark set for graph clustering and graph partitioning. In: Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnes, J., Hut, P.: A hierarchical \(O(n \log n)\) force-calculation algorithm. Nature 324, 446–449 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartel, G., Gutwenger, C., Klein, K., Mutzel, P.: An experimental evaluation of multilevel layout methods. In: Brandes, U., Cornelsen, S. (eds.) GD 2010. LNCS, vol. 6502, pp. 80–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandes, U., Pich, C.: Eigensolver methods for progressive multidimensional scaling of large data. In: Kaufmann, M., Wagner, D. (eds.) GD 2006. LNCS, vol. 4372, pp. 42–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, T.: The university of florida sparse matrix collection (2008). http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/matrices
  7. 7.
    Demetrescu, C., Goldberg, A.V., Johnson, D.S.: The Shortest Path Problem: 9th DIMACS Implementation Challenge, vol. 74. AMS (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eades, P.: A heuristic for graph drawing. Congressus Numerantium 42, 146–160 (1984)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frishman, Y., Tal, A.: Multi-level graph layout on the GPU. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 13(6), 1310–1319 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fruchterman, T.M.J., Reingold, E.M.: Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exp. 21(11), 1129–1164 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gajer, P., Kobourov, S.G.: GRIP: Graph drawing with intelligent placement. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 6(3), 202–224 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gansner, E.R., Hu, Y., North, S.C.: A maxent-stress model for graph layout. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(6), 927–940 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gansner, E.R., Koren, Y., North, S.C.: Graph drawing by stress majorization. In: Pach, J. (ed.) GD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3383, pp. 239–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Godiyal, A., Hoberock, J., Garland, M., Hart, J.C.: Rapid multipole graph drawing on the GPU. In: Tollis, I.G., Patrignani, M. (eds.) GD 2008. LNCS, vol. 5417, pp. 90–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hachul, S., Jünger, M.: Large-graph layout algorithms at work: an experimental study. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 11(2), 345–369 (2007)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hachul, S., Jünger, M.: Drawing large graphs with a potential-field-based multilevel algorithm. In: Pach, J. (ed.) GD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3383, pp. 285–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holtgrewe, M., Sanders, P., Schulz, C.: Engineering a scalable high quality graph partitioner. In: IEEE Parallel and Distributed Computing (IPDPS 2010), pp. 1–12. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoske, D., Lukarski, D., Meyerhenke, H., Wegner, M.: Is nearly-linear the same in theory and practice? a case study with a combinatorial laplacian solver. In: Bampis, E. (ed.) SEA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9125, pp. 205–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hu, Y., Shi, L.: Visualizing large graphs. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Comput. Stat. 7(2), 115–136 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ingram, S., Munzner, T., Olano, M.: Glimmer: multilevel MDS on the GPU. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15(2), 249–261 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kamada, T., Kawai, S.: An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 31, 7–15 (1989)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kirmani, S., Raghavan, P.: Scalable parallel graph partitioning. In: High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (S 2013), pp. 51:1–51:10. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kobourov, S.G.: Force-directed drawing algorithms. In: Tamassia, R. (ed.) Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization, Chap. 12, pp. 383–408. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koutis, I., Miller, G.L., Tolliver, D.: Combinatorial preconditioners and multilevel solvers for problems in computer vision and image processing. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 115(12), 1638–1646 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kruskal, J.B.: Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29(1), 1–27 (1964)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Livne, O.E., Brandt, A.: Lean algebraic multigrid (LAMG): fast graph Laplacian linear solver. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34(4), B499–B522 (2012)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyerhenke, H., Nöllenburg, M., Schulz, C.: Drawing large graphs by multilevel maxent-stress optimization. CoRR, arXiv:1506.04383 (2015)
  28. 28.
    Meyerhenke, H., Sanders, P., Schulz, C.: Partitioning complex networks via size-constrained clustering. In: Gudmundsson, J., Katajainen, J. (eds.) SEA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8504, pp. 351–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Quigley, A., Eades, P.: FADE: graph drawing, clustering, and visual abstraction. In: Marks, J. (ed.) GD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1984, pp. 197–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raghavan, U.N., Albert, R., Kumara, S.: Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Phy. Rev. E 76(3), 036106 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soper, A.J., Walshaw, C., Cross, M.: A combined evolutionary search and multilevel optimisation approach to graph-partitioning. J. Global Optim. 29(2), 225–241 (2004)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Walshaw, C.: A multilevel algorithm for force-directed graph-drawing. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 7(3), 253–285 (2003)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henning Meyerhenke
    • 1
  • Martin Nöllenburg
    • 2
  • Christian Schulz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical InformaticsKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Algorithms and Complexity GroupTU WienViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations