International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering

Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering pp 33-45 | Cite as

A Case Study Investigation of a Lightweight, Systematic Elicitation Approach for Enterprise Architecture Requirements

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 551)

Abstract

Enterprise architectures (EA) try to develop an alignment between an enterprise’s technology infrastructures with its business objectives and are often facilitated by an EA framework (EAF). EAFs provide the processes to create and govern an EA and have been used to understand both strategy and business architecture to synthesize a supporting information system infrastructure. However, existing EAFs do not provide lightweight, systematic process for eliciting the needed inputs to develop an EA. The contribution of this work is a lightweight, systematic approach for eliciting the enterprise vision, mission and objective requirements necessary as input to an EAF. We make two basic claims for this idea. First, the utilization of the Vision-Mission-Objectives-Strategy-Tactics (VMOST) queries provides a lightweight approach for eliciting required EA knowledge from stakeholders. Second, the use of the Grounded Theory Method, a qualitative analysis technique, provides a structured, systematic approach for analyzing and documenting elicited EA requirements. To illustrate these claims, we apply our lightweight, EA elicitation approach to a real world enterprise using the case study approach as a research methodology.

Keywords

Enterprise architecture Grounded Theory Method Requirements engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J.: Strategic alignment in requirements analysis for organizational IT. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing - SAC 2005, p. 1300 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bleistein, S., Cox, K., Verner, J.: Validating strategic alignment of organizational IT requirements using goal modeling and problem diagrams. J. Syst. Softw. 79(3), 362–378 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chakraborty, S., Dehlinger, J.: Applying the grounded theory method to derive enterprise system requirements. In: 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2009. SNPD 2009, pp. 333–338 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chakraborty, S., Rosenkranz, C., Dehlinger, J.: A grounded theoretical and linguistic analysis approach for non-functional requirements analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dewey, M.: Library notes: improved methods and labor-savers for librarians, readers and writers, vol. 2–3, Library Bureau (1893)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisenhardt, M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gianni, D., Lindman, N., Fuchs, J., Suzic, R.: Introducing the European space agency architectural framework for space-based systems of systems engineering. In: Hammami, O., Krob, D., Voirin, J.-L. (eds.) Complex Systems Design and Management SE - 24, pp. 335–346. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: Discovery of Grounded Theory - Strategies for Qualitative Research. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1967)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasan, R., Chakraborty, S., Dehlinger, J.: Examining software maintenance processes in small organizations: findings from a case study. In: Lee, R. (ed.) Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications 2011. SCI, vol. 377, pp. 129–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). SERA (selected papers)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jarvis, R.: Enterprise Architecture: Understanding the Bigger Picture - A Best Practice Guide for Decision Makers in IT. The UK National Computing Centre, Manchester (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work (The Enterprise Engineering Series). Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leimkuhler, F.F.: Systems analysis in university libraries. In: American Society for Engineering Education (Annual Meeting). College And Research Libraries, Chicago (1965, reprint)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luftman, J.N., Lewis, P.R., Oldach, S.H.: Transforming the enterprise: the alignment of business and information technology strategies. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 198–221 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minoli, D.: Enterprise Architecture A to Z: Frameworks, Business Process Modeling, SOA, and Infrastructure Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Open Group Architecture Forum (Forde, C.). The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF). 9th edn, Reading, Berkshire, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosasco, N., Dehlinger, J.: Application of a lightweight enterprise architecture elicitation technique using a case study approach. In: 9th International Conference Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosasco, N., Dehlinger, J.: Eliciting business architecture information in enterprise architecture frameworks using VMOST. In: 2011 1st ACIS/JNU International Conference on Computers, Networks, Systems and Industrial Engineering (CNSI), pp. 474–478 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosasco, N., Dehlinger, J.: Business architecture elicitation for enterprise architecture: VMOST versus conventional strategy capture. In: 2011 9th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), pp. 153–157 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sondhi, R.K.: Total Strategy, p. 272. Airworthy Publications International, Kirkby Stephen (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organization science and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4), 409–421 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yin, R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zwickey, L.: Writing a library’s mission and vision statement. In: Future Ready 365/Special Libraries Association, Alexandria (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing and Information SciencesValparaiso UniversityValparaisoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer and Information SciencesTowson UniversityTowsonUSA

Personalised recommendations