User Intention Driven Adaptive Gait Assistance Using a Wearable Exoskeleton
A user intention based rehabilitation strategy for a lower-limb wearable robot is proposed and evaluated. The control strategy, which involves monitoring the human-orthosis interaction torques, determines the gait initiation instant and modifies orthosis operation for gait assistance, when needed. Orthosis operation is classified as assistive or resistive in function of its evolution with respect to a normal gait pattern. The control algorithm relies on the adaptation of the joints’ stiffness in function of their interaction torques and their deviation from the desired trajectories. An average of recorded gaits obtained from healthy subjects is used as reference input. The objective of this work is to develop a control strategy that can trigger the gait initiation from the user’s intention and maintain the dynamic stability, using an efficient real-time stiffness adaptation for multiple joints, simultaneously maintaining their synchronization. The algorithm has been tested with five healthy subjects showing its efficient behavior in initiating the gait and maintaining the equilibrium while walking in presence of external forces. The work is performed as a preliminary study to assist patients suffering from incomplete Spinal cord injury and Stroke.
KeywordsAdaptive control Exoskeleton Gait initiation Gait assistance Wearable robot
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Marchal-Crespo, L., Reinkensmeyer, D.: Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 6(20) (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Noda, T., et al.: Brain-controlled exoskeleton robot for BMI rehabilitation. In: 12th IEEE RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Osaka, Japan, pp. 21–27 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Kawamoto, H., et al.: Voluntary motion support control of robot suit HAL triggered by bioelectrical signal for hemiplegia. In: 32nd International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Buenos, Aires, pp. 462–466 (2010)Google Scholar
- 9.Kazerooni, H., Racine, J.L., Huang, L., Steger, R.: On the control of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pp. 4353–4360 (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.van Dijk, W., van der Kooij, H.: XPED2: A passive exoskeleton with artificial tendons. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 56–61, December 2014Google Scholar
- 11.Strausser, K.A., Kazerooni, H.: The development and testing of a human machine interface for a mobile medical exoskeleton. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 4911–4916 (2011)Google Scholar
- 12.Talaty, M., Esquenazi, A., Briceño, J.E.: Differentiating ability in users of the rewalk powered exoskeleton. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Seattle, USA, pp. 1–5 (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Bortole, M., Del-Ama, A.J., Rocon, E., Moreno, J.C., Brunetti, F., Pons, J.L.: A robotic exoskeleton for overground gait rehabilitation. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 3356–3361 (2013)Google Scholar