Advertisement

TwoPILP: An Integer Programming Method for HCSP in Parallel Computing Centers

  • José Carlos Soto-Monterrubio
  • Héctor Joaquín Fraire-Huacuja
  • Juan Frausto-Solís
  • Laura Cruz-Reyes
  • Rodolfo Pazos R.
  • J. Javier González-Barbosa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9414)

Abstract

Scheduling is a problem in computer science with a wide range of applicability in industry. The Heterogeneous Computing Scheduling Problem (HCSP) belongs to the parallel computing area and is applicable to scheduling in clusters and high performance data centers. HCSP has been solved traditionally as a mono-objective problem that aims at minimizing the makespan (termination time of the last task) and has been solved by Branch and Bound (B&B) algorithms. HCSP with energy is a multi-objective optimization problem with two objectives: minimize the makespan and the energy consumption by the machines. In this paper, an integer linear programming model for HCSP is presented. In addition, a multi-objective method called TwoPILP (Two-Phase Integer Linear Programming) is proposed for this model. TwoPILP consists of two phases. The first minimizes the makespan using a classic branch and bound method. The second phase minimizes the energy consumption by selecting adequate voltage levels. The proposed model provides advantages over mono-objective models which are discussed in the paper sections. The experimentation presented compares TwoPILP versus B&B and NSGA-II, showing that TwoPILP achieves better results than B&B and NSGA-II. This method offers the advantage of providing only one solution to the user, which is particularly useful for applications where there is no decision maker for choosing from a set of solutions delivered by multi-objective optimization methods.

Keywords

Scheduling Branch and bound Modeling Planning 

References

  1. 1.
    Garey, A.M., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, San Francisco (1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ENERGY, S.: Energy Star. History: ENERGY STAR (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    TOP500.org: The 43rd top500 list published during isc14 in Leipzig, Germany. ISC (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friese, R., Brinks, T., Oliver, C., Siegel, H.J., Maciejewski, A.A.: Analyzing the trade-offs between minimizing makespan and minimizing energy consumption in a heterogeneous resource allocation problem. In: INFOCOMP, The Second International Conference on Advanced Communications and Computation (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pooranian, Z., Harounabadi, A., Shojafar, M., Hedayat, N.: New hybrid algorithm for task scheduling in grid computing to decrease missed task. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 55, 924–928 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pooranian, Z., Shojafar, M., Javadi, B.: Independent task scheduling in grid computing based on queen bee algorithm. IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. (IJ-AI) 1(4), 171–181 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaturvedi, A.K., Sahu, R.: New heuristic for scheduling of independent tasks in computational grid. Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput. 4(3), 25–36 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raj, R.J.S., Vasudevan, V.: Beyond simulated annealing in grid scheduling. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. (IJCSE) 3(3), 1312–1318 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huacuja, H.J.F., Santiago, A., Pecero, J.E., Dorronsoro, B., Bouvry, P., Monterrubio, J.C.S., Barbosa, J.J.G., Santillan, C.G.: A comparison between memetic algorithm and seeded genetic algorithm for multi-objective independent task scheduling on heterogeneous machines. Design of Intelligent Systems Based on Fuzzy Logic, pp. 377–389. Neural Networks and Nature-Inspired Optimization. Springer International Publishing, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guzek, M., Pecero, J.E., Dorronsoro, B., Bouvry, P., Khan, S.U.: A cellular genetic algorithm for scheduling applications and energy-aware communication optimization. In: 2010 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pp. 241–248. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deb K., A. S., P. A. and M. T.: A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: Nsga-ii. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, vol. 1917 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang, P.C., Chen, S.H., Zhang, Q., Lin, J.L.: MOEA/D for flowshop scheduling problems. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC 2008 (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), pp. 1433–1438 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yagmahan, B., Yenisey, M.M.: A multi-objective ant colony system algorithm for flow shop scheduling problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(2), 1361–1368 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graham, R., Lawler, E., Lenstra, J., Kan, A.R.: Optimization and Approximation in Deterministic Sequencing and Scheduling: a Survey. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braunt, T.D., Siegel, H.J., Beck, N., Boloni, L.L., Maheswarans, M.: A comparison study of eleven static heuristics for mapping a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous distributed computing systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 61, 810–837 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diaz, C.O., Guzek, M., Pecero, J.E., Danoy, G., Bouvry, P., Khan, S.U.: Energy-aware fast scheduling heuristics in heterogeneous computing systems. In: 2011 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pp. 478–484. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guzek, M., Diaz, C.O., Pecero, J.E., Bouvry, P., Zomaya, A.Y.: Impact of voltage levels number for energy-aware bi-objective dag scheduling for multi-processors systems. In: Papasratorn, B., Charoenkitkarn, N., Lavangnananda, K., Chutimaskul, W., Vanijja, V. (eds.) IAIT 2012. CCIS, vol. 344, pp. 70–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishibuchi, H., Yoshida, T., Murata, T.: Balance between genetic search and local search in memetic algorithms for multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 204–223 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Conway, R.W., Maxwell, W.L., Miller, L.W.: Theory of Scheduling. Courier Corporation, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones, A., Rabelo, L.C., Sharawi, A.T.: Survey of job shop scheduling techniques. Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CECAL: HCSP - Heterogeneous Computing Scheduling Problem. CECAL, 1993. http://www.fing.edu.uy/inco/grupos/cecal/hpc/HCSP/index.html. Accessed 1 September 2013
  22. 22.
    Lee, Y.C., Zomaya, A.Y.: Energy efficient distributed computing systems. Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 88, pp. 1–34. Wiley, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Emami, M., Ghiasi, Y., Jaberi, N.: Energy-aware scheduling using dynamic voltage-frequency scaling. CoRR, vol. abs/1206.1984 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pecero, J.E., Bouvry, P., Fraire Huacuja, H.J., Khan, S.U.: A multi-objective grasp algorithm for joint optimization of energy consumption and schedule length of precedence-constrained applications. In: Cloud and Green Computing (CGC 2011) (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pecero, J.E., Bouvry, P., Barrios, C.J.: Low energy and high performance scheduling on scalable computing systems. In: Latin-American Conference on High Performance Computing, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, Y.C., Zomaya, A.Y.: Energy conscious scheduling for distributed computing systems under different operating conditions. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 22, 1374–1381 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mokotoff, E., Jimeno, J.: Heuristics based on partial enumeration for the unrelated parallel processor scheduling problem. Annals of Operations Research, pp. 133–150. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Carlos Soto-Monterrubio
    • 1
  • Héctor Joaquín Fraire-Huacuja
    • 1
  • Juan Frausto-Solís
    • 1
  • Laura Cruz-Reyes
    • 1
  • Rodolfo Pazos R.
    • 1
  • J. Javier González-Barbosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. MaderoCiudad MaderoMexico

Personalised recommendations