Transition Engineering

Change Projects for the Energy Transition
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 33)


We cannot predict the future. However, we know that development in this century will be different from the last, and the fundamental problem will be energy. World consumption and population growth have been accompanied by growth in total energy supply, and by improvements in productivity and efficiency. More than 90 % of current energy supply is fossil hydrocarbons, finite resources that produce a potent green house gas, CO2. Resource, environmental and social limits to growth have been studied since the 1970s, and a wide range of factors indicate that the drivers of growth in the previous century are slowing [1]. The energy transition is the only realistic approach to mitigating the most destructive climate impacts of increased green house gas concentrations [2].


Wind Farm Transition Engineer Wicked Problem Finite Resource Demand Side Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (2004) Limits to growth, the 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stern N (2006) Stern review: the economics of climate change, HM Treasury Cabinet Office.;
  3. 3.
    HM Treasury, The Orange Book Management of Risk-Principles and Concepts (2004) HMSO, UK.
  4. 4.
    The 1911 Triangle Factory Fire. Accessed 2015
  5. 5.
    McCormick LW (2006) A short history of the airbag, consumer affairs.
  6. 6.
    American Society of Safety Engineers.
  7. 7.
    Linden MO, Kazakov AF, Brown JS, Domanski PA (2014) A thermodynamic analysis of refrigerants: possibilities and tradeoffs for low-GWP refrigerants. Int J Refrig 38:80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2002).
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Renewable Fuels Association (2015) Statistics.
  11. 11.
    Cobb J (2015) February 2015 Dashboard, HybridCARS.
  12. 12.
    Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF (2015) Global trends in renewable energy investment 2015. Frankfurt School of Finance & Management gGmbHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ram E. CEO of Ram Energy Inc., personal discussion Sept 2015Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team. Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Beerling D, Berner R, Masson-Delmotte V, Pagani M, Raymo M, Royer DL, Zachos JC (2008) Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? Open Atmos Sci J 2:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IEA (2015) Energy and climate change, world energy outlook special report.
  17. 17.
    Winston AS (2014) The big pivot, radically practical strategies for a hotter, scarcer and more open world. Harvard Business School Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chapman I (2014) The end of peak oil? Why this topic is still relevant despite recent denials. Energy Policy 64:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    USGS (2010) Mineral commodity summaries. Tech. rep.; US Geological Survey (2010). Accessed Feb 2015
  20. 20.
    Van Kauwenbergh SJ (2010) World phosphate rock reserves and resources. International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, AL, USA.
  21. 21.
    Platt McGinn A (1998) Rocking the boat: conserving fisheries and protecting jobs. World watch paper, 142, World Watch InstituteGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ecofys (2011) The energy report, 100 % renewable energy by 2050.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    The Natural Step. Accessed Oct 2015
  25. 25.
    Renewable Fuels Association (2015).
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Krumdieck S (2013) Transition engineering: adaptation of complex systems for survival. Int J Sustain Dev 16(3/4):310–321Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Needleman HL (2000) Review: the removal of lead from gasoline: historical and personal reflections. Environ Res Sect A 84:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kenny J, Barber N, Huston S, Linsey K, Lovelace J, Maupin A (2005) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005, Circular 1344, USGS, pp 38–41Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Torcellini P, Long N, Judkoff R (2003) Consumptive water use for U.S. power production, NREL/TP-550-33905Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lazard Ltd. (2014) Energy technology assessment. Lazard Ltd., New York.
  32. 32.
    Ballard CW, Penner PS, Pilati DA (1978) Net energy analysis—handbook for combining process and input-output analysis. Res Energy 1:267–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dale M, Krumdieck S, Bodger P (2012) Global energy modeling—a biophysical approach (gemba) part 2: methodology and results. Ecol Econ 73:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lambert JG, Hall CAS, Balogh S, Gupta A, Arnold M (2014) Energy, EROI and quality of life. Energy Policy 64:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gupta AK, Hall CAS (2011) A review of the past and current state of EROI data. Sustainability 3:1796–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gellings CW (1985) The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities. Proc IEEE 73(10):1468–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Boshell F, Kema B, Veloza OP (2008) Review of developed demand side management programs including different concepts and their results. In: Transmission and distribution conference and exposition: Latin America, 2008 IEEE/PES, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    California Energy Commission (2014)
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Singh RK, Murthy HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15(1):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Science for Energy Scenarios (2014).
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    Hansen J (2009) Storms of my grandchildren. Bloomsbury, NYGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Flannery T (2005) The weather makers. Grove Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bossel U, Eliasson B, Taylor G (2003) The future of the hydrogen economy: bright or bleak? The 2003 fuel cell seminar, 3–7 November 2003.
  47. 47.
    Edwards J (2014) Oil sands pollutants in traditional foods. Can Med Assoc J 186(12):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    The Editors. 12 Oct 2011. Safety first, fracking second, Scientific AmericanGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
  50. 50.
    Krumdieck S, Page S, Dantas A (2010) Urban form and long term fuel supply decline: a method to investigate the peak oil risks to essential activities. Transp Res Part A 44:306–322Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Deffeyes K (2001) Hubbert’s peak: the impending world oil shortage. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    United Nations (2012) World population prospects: the 2012 Revision, Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat.
  53. 53.
    Krumdieck S, Hamm A (2009) Strategic analysis methodology for energy systems with remote island case study. Energy Policy 37(9):3301–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
    Krumdieck S (2011) Transition engineering of urban transportation for resilience to peak oil risks. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011, ICEME2011-65836, 11–17 Nov 2011, Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gellings CW, Parmenter KE (2007) Chapter 5.3 Demand side management. In: Goswami DY, Kreith F (eds) Handbook of energy efficiency and renewable energy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 5-33–5-53Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chaussumier D (2014) Scenarios for oil supply.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Advanced Energy and Material Systems LabChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Global Association for Transition EngineeringChelmsfordUK
  4. 4.From the Ground UpChristchurchNew Zealand
  5. 5.Geothermal Energy Conversion Technology Research GroupChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations