Advertisement

Sustainable Internationalization? Measuring the Diversity of Internationalization at Higher Education Institutions

  • Miguel Rodriguez LopezEmail author
  • Benjamin R. K. Runkle
  • Stefan Roski
  • Jana Stöver
  • Kerstin Jantke
  • Manuel Gottschick
  • Delf Rothe
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Sustainability and internationalization are considered to be core values of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), but their relationship is rarely investigated. The current study develops a framework to create a sustainable internationalization policy for an HEI; it analyzes how to measure the sustainability of an internationalization policy in two steps. First, this study presents a theoretical framework for a cost-benefit analysis of HEIs’ sustainable internationalization policies using three sustainability pillars (economic, ecological, and social), each with examples for their own measurable indicators. Second, this research operationalizes the economic pillar of the framework to enable a specific measurement of the economic sustainability of internationalization. The empirical analysis identifies the distribution of funding for internationalization as a promising indicator. To demonstrate the implementation of this part of the framework, this study analyzes how German HEIs distribute their monetary investments in internationalization activities to countries worldwide. Using data from the German academic exchange service (DAAD), this research investigates the distribution using descriptive statistics. In a second step, the methodology of the Lorenz curve is empirically applied to the distribution of funding. Universität Hamburg is used as a case study to visualize the different funding tendencies among German HEIs. The findings suggest that the distribution of resources for internationalization says more about the sustainable character of an HEI than the absolute amount of invested resources. To evaluate the sustainability of an HEI’s internationalization strategy, it is therefore necessary to look at the distribution of target countries in addition to the mere absolute level of funding.

Keywords

Internationalization Sustainability Lorenz curve German academic exchange service (DAAD) Higher education institution (HEI) 

References

  1. Barth M (2013) Many roads lead to sustainability: a process-oriented analysis of change in higher education. Int J Sustain High Educ 14(2):160–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brinkhurst M, Rose P, Maurice G, Ackerman JD (2011) Achieving campus sustainability: top-down, bottom-up, or neither? Int J Sustain High Educ 12(4):338–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DAAD (2013) Jahresbericht. Available at: https://www.daad.de/medien/daad-jahresbericht-2013.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2015
  4. Delgado-Márquez BL, Escudero-Torres MÁ, Hurtado-Torres NE (2013) Being highly internationalised strengthens your reputation: an empirical investigation of top higher education institutions. High Educ 66(5):619–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elkin G, Devjee F, Farnsworth J (2005) Visualising the ‘internationalisation’ of universities. Int J Educ Manage 19(4):318–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Findlay A, King R, Stam A, Ruiz-Gelices E (2006) Ever reluctant europeans: the changing geographies of UK students studying and working abroad. Eur Urban Reg Stud 13(4):291–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fortuijn JD (2002) Internationalising learning and teaching: a European experience. J Geogr High Educ 26(3):263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gastwirth JL (1972) A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Rev Econ Stat 54(3):306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hale BW, Vogelaar A, Long J (2013) A-broad spectrum: sustainability in educational travel. Int J Sustain High Educ 14(4):349–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Layard R, Glaister S (1994) Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leal Filho W (2010) Teaching sustainable development at university level: current trends and future needs. J Baltic Sci Educ 9(4):273–284Google Scholar
  12. Leal Filho W, Evangelos M, Pace P (2015) The future we want. Int J Sustain High Educ 16(1):112–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee WC (1999) Probabilistic analysis of global performances of diagnostic tests: interpreting the Lorenz curve-based summary measures. Stat Med 18(4):455–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Little M, Cordero E (2014) Modeling the relationship between transportation-related carbon dioxide emissions and hybrid-online courses at a large urban university. Int J Sustain High Educ 15(3):270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lozano R (2011) The state of sustainability reporting in universities. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(1):67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marin E (2014) The mobility of Romanian students in Europe. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 116:4884–4888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell K (2012) Student mobility and European identity: erasmus study as a civic experience? J Contemp Eur Res 8(4):490–518Google Scholar
  18. Otero MS (2008) The socio-economic background of erasmus students: a trend towards wider inclusion? Int Rev Educ 54(2):135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paige MR, Fry GW, Stallman EM, Josic J, Jon J-E (2009) Study abroad for global engagement: the long-term impact of mobility experiences. Intercultural Educ 20(1):29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodríguez González C, Bustillo Mesanza R, Mariel P (2011) The determinants of international student mobility flows: an empirical study on the Erasmus programme. High Educ 62(4):413–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Souto-Otero M, Huisman J, Beerkens M, de Wit H, Vujic S (2013) Barriers to international student mobility: evidence from the erasmus program. Educ Res 42(2):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sundsbø AO, Runkle BR, McMonagle S, Jantke K, Lottermoser F, Gottschick M, Häseler M, Rodriguez Lopez JM and Scheele M (2015) One metaphor—several meanings: an interdisciplinary approach to sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro UM, Caeiro S and Alves F (Eds) Integrating sustainability thinking in science and engineering curricula. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 197–213Google Scholar
  23. Swearingen White S (2014) Campus sustainability plans in the United States: where, what, and how to evaluate? Int J Sustain High Educ 15(2):228–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Waheed B, Khan FI, Veitch B (2011) Developing a quantitative tool for sustainability assessment of HEIs. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(4):355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. World Bank (2014) World development indicators online (WDI) database. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 2 Dec 2014
  26. World Summit on Sustainable Development (2003) Cultural diversity and biodiversity for sustainable development, a jointly convened UNESCO and UNEP high-level roundtable during the World Summit on Sustainable Development, 3 Sep 2002, Johannesburg, South-Africa. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001322/132262e.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2014

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Rodriguez Lopez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benjamin R. K. Runkle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stefan Roski
    • 1
  • Jana Stöver
    • 1
  • Kerstin Jantke
    • 1
  • Manuel Gottschick
    • 1
  • Delf Rothe
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.University of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations