Advertisement

ERCP in Children, Pregnant Patients, and the Elderly

  • Mohamed O. Othman
  • Waqar A. QureshiEmail author
Chapter
  • 763 Downloads

Abstract

Although most commonly performed in adults for a variety of reasons, ERCP is also frequently required in special patient subsets. The three most common special patient subsets are children, pregnant patients, and elderly patients (often defined as patients over 60 or 65 years of age). ERCP tools, techniques, and procedures can be different in these patients given their special needs. This chapter will review the role of ERCP in these special patient subgroups.

Keywords

Age considerations Pregnancy and fetal outcome Technical considerations Safety in ERCP Sedation 

Supplementary material

Video 11.1

This clip shows the removal of multiple large stones with balloon extraction following endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation of the sphincter of Oddi (MP4 13528 kb).

Video 11.2

Double wire method to access the CBD in a case of difficult cannulation. The firstl wire kept going into the PD so is left in place and a second wire aids in both selecting the access of the CBD and blocking re-entry into the PD (MP4 11457 kb).

Video 11.3

Here the ampulla os is inside a diverticulum and difficult to cannulate with a standard 0.035 wire. A loop tip wire enables entry into the CBD and an endoscopic sphincterotomy and plastic stent placement are then performed (MP4 11523 kb).

Video 11.4

A precut sphincterotomy is performed here with small upward cuts from the os along the axis of the CBD following frequent attempts to advance the wire. Once access is gained, dye is injected to confirm entry into the CBD and then an ES is completed (MP4 13393 kb).

Video 11.5

In this video clip, an endoscopic sphincterotomy is performed over a wire and then the spyglass cholangioscope is advanced into the biliary tree. Some blood is seen over an ulcerated mass. Towards the end of the video, a forceps is introduced to biopsy this area (MP4 16757 kb).

References

  1. 1.
    Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010;39:157–69. vii.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:806–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Lightdale JR, Acosta R, et al. Modifications in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jang JY, Yoon CH, Kim KM. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pancreatic and biliary tract disease in Korean children. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:490–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otto AK, Neal MD, Slivka AN, et al. An appraisal of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreaticobiliary disease in children: our institutional experience in 231 cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2536–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durakbasa CU, Balik E, Yamaner S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children and adolescents: experience in a single institution. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18:241–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hukkinen M, Koivusalo A, Lindahl H, et al. Increasing occurrence of choledochal malformations in children: a single-center 37-year experience from Finland. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1255–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paris C, Bejjani J, Beaunoyer M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:938–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hiramatsu T, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Usefulness and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children with pancreaticobiliary maljunction. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:377–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Otto AK, Neal MD, Mazariegos GV, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary disease following abdominal organ transplant in children. Pediatr Transplant. 2012;16:829–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Issa H, Al-Haddad A, Al-Salem AH. Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in the pediatric age group. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23:111–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poddar U, Thapa BR, Bhasin DK, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of pancreaticobiliary disorders in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:927–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng CL, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a large series report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:445–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Hawes RH, et al. Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:367–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Troendle DM, Abraham O, Huang R, et al. Factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis and the effect of pancreatic duct stenting in a pediatric population. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1408–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giefer MJ, Kozarek RA. Technical outcomes and complications of pediatric ERCP. Surg Endosc 2015.Dec;29(12):3543-50.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun HL, Han B, Zhai HP, et al. Rectal NSAIDs for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon. 2014;12:141–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaddu R, Bhattacharya D, Metriyakool K, et al. Propofol compared with general anesthesia for pediatric GI endoscopy: is propofol better? Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:27–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dar AQ, Shah ZA. Anesthesia and sedation in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;2:257–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Halvorson L, Halsey K, Darwin P, et al. The safety and efficacy of therapeutic ERCP in the pediatric population performed by adult gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3611–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Green JA, Scheeres DE, Conrad HA, et al. Pediatric ERCP in a multidisciplinary community setting: experience with a fellowship-trained general surgeon. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2187–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kieling CO, Hallal C, Spessato CO, et al. Changing pattern of indications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children and adolescents: a twelve-year experience. World J Pediatr. 2014;11:154–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim Y, Hyun JJ, Lee JM, et al. Anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary duct without choledochal cyst: is cholecystectomy alone sufficient? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399:1071–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terui K, Hishiki T, Saito T, et al. Pancreas divisum in pancreaticobiliary maljunction in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26:419–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coelho DE, Ardengh JC, Lima-Filho ER, et al. Different clinical aspects of Wirsungocele: case series of three patients and review of literature. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2011;41:230–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lutzak GD, Gluck M, Ross AS, et al. Endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy in patients with santoriniceles reduces pain and improves quality of life. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2075–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bloom DE, Chatterji S, Kowal P, et al. Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet. 2015;385:649–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fritz E, Kirchgatterer A, Hubner D, et al. ERCP is safe and effective in patients 80 years of age and older compared with younger patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:899–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, et al. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:417–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Outpatient therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe in patients aged 80 years and older. Endoscopy. 2011;43:128–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yun DY, Han J, Oh JS, et al. Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography safe in patients 90 years of age and older? Gut Liver. 2014;8:552–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kounis NG, Zavras GM, Papadaki PJ, et al. Electrocardiographic changes in elderly patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;17:539–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fisher L, Fisher A, Thomson A. Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP in older patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:948–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1957–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nakamura K, Yamaguchi Y, Hasue T, et al. The usefulness and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:2191–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oh MJ, Kim TN. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1071–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jin PP, Cheng JF, Liu D, et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5548–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Park JS, Kim TN, Kim KH. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for treatment of large bile duct stones does not increase the risk of post-procedure pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:3092–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hong WD, Zhu QH, Huang QK. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2011;23:240–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Han J, Moon JH, Koo HC, et al. Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2418–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee TH, Han JH, Kim HJ, et al. Is the addition of choleretic agents in multiple double-pigtail biliary stents effective for difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients? A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:96–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Di Giorgio P, Manes G, Grimaldi E, et al. Endoscopic plastic stenting for bile duct stones: stent changing on demand or every 3 months. A prospective comparison study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:1014–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kwon SK, Lee BS, Kim NJ, et al. Is cholecystectomy necessary after ERCP for bile duct stones in patients with gallbladder in situ? Korean J Intern Med. 2001;16:254–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ingoldby CJ, el-Saadi J, Hall RI, et al. Late results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in elderly patients with gall bladders in situ. Gut. 1989;30:1129–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cui ML, Cho JH, Kim TN. Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1711–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weber DM. Laparoscopic surgery: an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1083–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    McAlister VC, Davenport E, Renouf E. Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD006233.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Di Mauro D, Faraci R, Mariani L, et al. Rendezvous technique for cholecystocholedochal lithiasis in octogenarians: is it as effective as in younger patients, or should endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy be preferred? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:13–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zippi M, Traversa G, Pica R, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in patients with Periampullary duodenal diverticula (PAD). Clin Ter. 2014;165:e291–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tyagi P, Sharma P, Sharma BC, et al. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1342–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:396–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Myung DS, Park CH, Koh HR, et al. Cap-assisted ERCP in patients with difficult cannulation due to periampullary diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2014;46:352–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ustundag Y, Karakaya K, Aydemir S. Biliary cannulation facilitated by endoscopic clip assistance in the setting of intra-diverticular papilla. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2009;20:279–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, et al. Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013;12:408–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ko CW, Beresford SA, Schulte SJ, et al. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy. Hepatology. 2005;41:359–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang HH, Afdhal NH, Wang DQ. Estrogen receptor alpha, but not beta, plays a major role in 17beta-estradiol-induced murine cholesterol gallstones. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:239–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Abu-Hayyeh S, Papacleovoulou G, Lovgren-Sandblom A, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy levels of sulfated progesterone metabolites inhibit farnesoid X receptor resulting in a cholestatic phenotype. Hepatology. 2013;57:716–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Valdivieso V, Covarrubias C, Siegel F, et al. Pregnancy and cholelithiasis: pathogenesis and natural course of gallstones diagnosed in early puerperium. Hepatology. 1993;17:1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003;13:775–98. xi.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lowe SA. Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:191–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tang SJ, Mayo MJ, Rodriguez-Frias E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:453–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fine S, Beirne J, Delgi-Esposti S, et al. Continued evidence for safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;6:352–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yang J, Zhang X, Zhang X. Therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among pregnant women with severe acute biliary pancreatitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:437–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gupta R, Tandan M, Lakhtakia S, et al. Safety of therapeutic ERCP in pregnancy—an Indian experience. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005;24:161–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tham TC, Vandervoort J, Wong RC, et al. Safety of ERCP during pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:308–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Oto A, Ernst R, Ghulmiyyah L, et al. The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobiliary disease. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:279–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Simmons DC, Tarnasky PR, Rivera-Alsina ME, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy without the use of radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1467–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Daas AY, Agha A, Pinkas H, et al. ERCP in pregnancy: is it safe? Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2009;5:851–5.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Shelton J, Linder JD, Rivera-Alsina ME, et al. Commitment, confirmation, and clearance: new techniques for nonradiation ERCP during pregnancy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:364–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chong VH, Jalihal A. Endoscopic management of biliary disorders during pregnancy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010;9:180–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Uradomo L, Pandolfe F, Aragon G, et al. SpyGlass cholangioscopy for management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011;10:107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Brent RL. Counseling patients exposed to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006;20:198–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Shergill AK, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Guidelines for endoscopy in pregnant and lactating women. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Othman MO, Stone E, Hashimi M, et al. Conservative management of cholelithiasis and its complications in pregnancy is associated with recurrent symptoms and more emergency department visits. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:564–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sethi S, Thosani N, Banerjee S. Radiation-free ERCP in pregnancy: a “sound” approach to leaving no stone unturned. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2604–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vohra S, Holt EW, Bhat YM, et al. Successful single-session endosonography-based endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography without fluoroscopy in pregnant patients with suspected choledocholithiasis: a case series. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:93–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Internal MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations