International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement

Product-Focused Software Process Improvement pp 105-113 | Cite as

A Method for Requirements Capture and Specification Based on Disciplined Use Cases and Screen Mockups

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9459)

Abstract

We present a novel method for capturing and writing requirements specifications that enriches disciplined use cases with screen mockups. Disciplined use cases are characterized by a quite stringent template, which allows to impose a large number of constraints helping to prevent common mistakes and to increase the quality of the specifications. Disciplined use cases are expressed using natural language, but the strong structuring allows to reach a good level of precision without having to introduce new (and more complex) notations. Screen mockups associated with the steps of the scenarios present the corresponding GUIs as seen by the human actors before/after the step executions, improving the comprehension of the requirements, and allowing also to precisely present non-functional requirements of the user interface. The method has been successfully applied in an industrial project and the effectiveness of the screen mockups has been validated by means of controlled experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Astesiano, E., Cerioli, M., Reggio, G., Ricca, F.: A phased highly-interactive approach to teaching UML-based software development. In: Proceedings of Educators Symposium at MoDELS 2007, pp. 9–18. University of Goteborg (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astesiano, E., Reggio, G.: Knowledge structuring and representation in requirement specification. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2002, pp. 143–150. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briola, D., Amicone, A., Laudisa, D.: Ontologies in industrial enterprise content management systems: the EC2M project. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Advanced Cognitive Technologies and Applications, pp. 153–160. IARIA (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choppy, C., Reggio, G.: Improving use case based requirements using formally grounded specifications. In: Wermelinger, M., Margaria-Steffen, T. (eds.) FASE 2004. LNCS, vol. 2984, pp. 244–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferreira, J., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: Agile development iterations and UI design. In: Proceedings of Agile Conference, AGILE 2007, pp. 50–58 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartson, H.R., Smith, E.C.: Rapid prototyping in human-computer interface development. Interact. Comput. 3(1), 51–91 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leotta, M., Reggio, G., Ricca, F., Astesiano, E.: Towards a lightweight model driven method for developing SOA systems using existing assets. In: Proceedings of 14th International Symposium on Web Systems Evolution, WSE 2012, pp. 51–60. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Docherty, M.: Object-Oriented Analysis and Design: Understanding System Development with UML 2.0. Wiley, Hoboken (2005) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reggio, G., Leotta, M., Ricca, F., Astesiano, E.: Business process modelling: five styles and a method to choose the most suitable one. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Experiences and Empirical Studies in Software Modelling, EESSMod 2012, pp. 8:1–8:6. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reggio, G., Ricca, F., Leotta, M.: Improving the quality and the comprehension of requirements: disciplined use cases and mockups. In: Proceedings of 40th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2014, pp. 262–266. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ricca, F., Scanniello, G., Torchiano, M., Reggio, G., Astesiano, E.: On the effectiveness of screen mockups in requirements engineering: results from an internal replication. In: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2010, pp. 17:1–17:10. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ricca, F., Scanniello, G., Torchiano, M., Reggio, G., Astesiano, E.: On the effort of augmenting use cases with screen mockups: results from a preliminary empirical study. In: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2010, pp. 40:1–40:4. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ricca, F., Scanniello, G., Torchiano, M., Reggio, G., Astesiano, E.: Assessing the effect of screen mockups on the comprehension of functional requirements. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 24(1), 1:1–1:38 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rivero, J.M., Grigera, J., Rossi, G., Luna, E.R., Montero, F., Gaedke, M.: Mockup-driven development: providing agile support for model-driven web engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(6), 670–687 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scanniello, G., Ricca, F., Torchiano, M., Gravino, C., Reggio, G.: Estimating the effort to develop screen mockups. In: Proceedings of 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2013, pp. 341–348 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, J., Chang, C., Chung, J.Y.: Mockup-driven fast-prototyping methodology for web requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of 27th International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2003, pp. 263–268. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIBRISUniversità di GenovaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations