Local Quadratic Entry Locus Manifolds and Conic Connected Manifolds

  • Francesco Russo
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana book series (UMILN, volume 18)

Abstract

We recall the definition of QEL, respectively LQEL, manifolds as those \(X \subset \mathbb{P}^{N}\) whose general entry locus is a quadric hypersurface of dimension equal to the secant defect of X, respectively the union of quadric hypersurfaces of dimension equal to the secant defect of X. We present the main results of the theory of LQEL-manifolds introduced in Russo (Math. Ann. 344:597–617, 2009), leading to the Divisibility Theorem for the secant defect of LQEL-manifolds. The main applications concern the classification of LQEL-manifolds of type \(\delta \geq \frac{n} {2}\), which also include Severi varieties. The rest of the chapter surveys the classification of conic-connected manifolds obtained in Ionescu and Russo (J. Reine Angew. Math. 644:145–158, 2010) and some of the results of Ionescu and Russo (Compos. Math. 144:949–962, 2008) and of Ionescu and Russo (Math. Res. Lett. 21:1137–1154, 2014) on dual defective manifolds. In particular, an astonishing simple proof of the famous Landman Parity Theorem for dual defective manifolds appears as an application of the tools developed in Chap.  2

Keywords

Complete Intersection Fano Manifold Composition Algebra Secant Defect Quadric Hypersurface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Ådlandsvik, Joins and higher secant varieties. Math. Scand. 61, 213–222 (1987)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A. Akivis, V.V. Goldberg, Smooth lines on projective planes over two-dimensional algebras and submanifolds with degenerate Gauss maps, Beiträge Algebra Geom. 44, 165–178 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.A. Akivis, V.V. Goldberg, Differential Geometry of Varieties with Degenerate Gauss Maps. CMS Books in Mathematics, vol. 18 (Springer, New York, 2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.A. Albert, On a certain algebra of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 35, 65–73 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.A. Albert, On power-associativity of rings. Summa Brasil. Math. 2, 21–32 (1948)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.A. Albert, On power associative rings. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 64, 552–593 (1948)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.A. Albert, A theory of power associative commutative algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 69, 503–527 (1950)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Alzati, Special linear systems and syzygies. Collect. Math. 59, 239–254 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Alzati, J.C. Sierra, Quadro-quadric special birational transformations of projective spaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2015–1, 55–77 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.F. Atiyah, Complex fibre bundles and ruled surfaces. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 5, 407–434 (1955)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Bǎdescu, Special chapters of projective geometry. Rend. Sem. Matem. Fisico Milano 69, 239–326 (1999–2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Bǎdescu, Projective Geometry and Formal Geometry. Monografie Matematyczne, vol. 65 (Birkäuser Verlag, Basel, 2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Bǎdescu, M. Schneider, A criterion for extending meromorphic functions. Math. Ann. 305, 393–402 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Barth, Submanifolds of low codimension in projective space, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Vancouver, 1974), Canadian Mathematical Congress, 1975, pp. 409–413Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Barth, M.E. Larsen, On the homotopy groups of complex projective algebraic manifolds. Math. Scand. 30, 88–94 (1972)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.C. Beltrametti, P. Ionescu, On manifolds swept out by high dimensional quadrics. Math. Z. 260, 229–234 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.C. Beltrametti, A.J. Sommese, J. Wiśniewski, Results on varieties with many lines and their applications to adjunction theory, in Complex Algebraic Varieties (Bayreuth, 1990). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1507 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992), pp. 16–38Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Bertini, Introduzione alla Geometria Proiettiva degli Iperspazi, seconda edizione (Casa Editrice Giuseppe Principato, Messina, 1923)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Bertram, L. Ein, R. Lazarsfeld, Vanishing theorems, a theorem of Severi and the equations defining projective varieties. J. Am. Math. Soc. 4, 587–602 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Bompiani, Proprietà differenziali caratteristiche di enti algebrici. Rom. Acc. L. Mem. 26, 452–474 (1921)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Brigaglia, La teoria generale delle algebre in Italia dal 1919 al 1937. Riv. Stor. Sci. 1, 199–237 (1984)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Bronowski, The sum of powers as canonical expressions. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 29, 69–82 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Bronowski, Surfaces whose prime sections are hyperelliptic. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 8, 308–312 (1933)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Castelnuovo, Massima dimensione dei sistemi lineari di curve piane di dato genere. Annali di Mat. 18, 119–128 (1890)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Carbonaro Marletta, I sistemi omaloidici di ipersuperficie dell’ S 4, legati alle algebre complesse di ordine 4, dotate di modulo. Rend. Accad. Sci. Fis. Mat. Napoli 15, 168–201 (1949)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Carbonaro Marletta, La funzione inversa y = x −1 in una algebra complessa semi-semplice. Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania 2, 195–201 (1953)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P.E. Chaput, Severi varieties. Math. Z. 240, 451–459 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. Chiantini, C. Ciliberto, Weakly defective varieties. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 354, 151–178 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Chiantini, C. Ciliberto, On the concept of k-secant order of a variety. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 73, 436–454 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Chiantini, C. Ciliberto, F. Russo, On secant defective varieties, work in progressGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. Ciliberto, Ipersuperficie algebriche a punti parabolici e relative hessiane. Rend. Acc. Naz. Scienze 98, 25–42 (1979–1980)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Ciliberto, On a property of Castelnuovo varieties. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 303, 201–210 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Ciliberto, F. Russo, Varieties with minimal secant degree and linear systems of maximal dimension on surfaces. Adv. Math. 200, 1–50 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Ciliberto, F. Russo, On the classification of OADP varieties. SCIENCE CHINA Math. 54, 1561–1575 (2011). Special issue dedicated to Fabrizio Catanese on the occasion of his 60th birthdayGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    C. Ciliberto, M.A. Cueto, M. Mella, K. Ranestad, P. Zwiernik, Cremona linearizations of some classical varieties, in Proceedings of the Conference “Homage to Corrado Segre”. arXiv: 1403.1814, to appearGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Ciliberto, M. Mella, F. Russo, Varieties with one apparent double point. J. Algebraic Geom. 13, 475–512 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    C. Ciliberto, F. Russo, A. Simis, Homaloidal hypersurfaces and hypersurfaces with vanishing Hessian. Adv. Math. 218, 1759–1805 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    F. Conforto, Le superficie razionali (Zanichelli, Bologna, 1939)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    C.W. Curtis, Linear Algebra—An Introductory Approach. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, corrected 6th edn. (Springer, New York, 1997)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    O. Debarre, Higher-Dimensional Algebraic Geometry. Universitext (Springer, New York, 2001).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    O. Debarre, Bend and Break (2007). Available at www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/~debarre/Grenoble.pdf
  42. 42.
    L. Degoli, Sui sistemi lineari di quadriche riducibili ed irriducibili a Jacobiana identicamente nulla. Collect. Math. 35, 131–148 (1984)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    P. Deligne, Letters to W. Fulton (July/November 1979)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. Deligne, Le groupe fondamental du complément d’une courbe plane n’ayant que des points doubles ordinaires est abélien. Sém. Bourbaki, n. 543, 1979/80. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 842 (Springer, Berlin, New York, 1981), pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    P. Deligne, N. Katz, Groupes de monodromie en géométrie algébrique (SGA7). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 340 (Springer, Berlin, New York, 1973)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    P. del Pezzo, Sulle superficie dell’ n-esimo ordine immerse nello spazio a n dimensioni. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 12, 241–271 (1887)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    V. Di Gennaro, Alcune osservazioni sulle singolarità dello schema di Hilbert che parametrizza le varietà lineari contenute in una varietà proiettiva. Ricerche Mat. 39, 259–291 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    I. Dolgachev, Classical Algebraic Geometry—A Modern View (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    W.L. Edge, The number of apparent double points of certain loci. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 28, 285–299 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    B.A. Edwards, Algebraic loci of dimension r − 3 in space of r dimensions, of which a chord cannot be drawn through an arbitrary point of space. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 155–158 (1927)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    L. Ein, Varieties with small dual variety I. Invent. Math. 86, 63–74 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    L. Ein, Vanishing Theorems for Varieties of Low Codimension. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1311 (Springer, New York, 1988), pp. 71–75Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    L. Ein, N. Shepherd-Barron, Some special Cremona transformations. Am. J. Math. 111, 783–800 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    A. Elduque, S. Okubo, On algebras satisfying x 2 x 2 = N(x)x. Math. Z. 235, 275–314 (2000)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    F. Enriques, Sulla massima dimensione dei sistemi lineari di dato genere appartenenti a una superficie algebrica. Atti Reale Acc. Scienze Torino 29, 275–296 (1894)MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    G. Faltings, Formale Geometrie und homogene Räume. Invent. Math. 64, 123–165 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    G. Faltings, Ein Kriterium für vollständige Durchschnitte. Invent. Math. 62, 393–402 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    G. Fano, Sulle varietà algebriche che sono intersezioni complete di più forme. Atti Reale Acc. Torino 44, 633–648 (1909)MATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    J. Faraut, A. Korányi, Analysis on Symmetric Cones (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    G. Fischer, J. Piontkowski, Ruled Varieties—An Introduction to Algebraic Differential Geometry. Advanced Lectures in Mathematics (Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 2001)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    A. Franchetta, Forme algebriche sviluppabili e relative hessiane. Atti Acc. Lincei 10, 1–4 (1951)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    A. Franchetta, Sulle forme algebriche di S 4 aventi hessiana indeterminata. Rend. Mat. 13, 1–6 (1954)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    B. Fu, Inductive characterizations of hyperquadrics. Math. Ann. 340, 185–194 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    B. Fu, J.M. Hwang, Classification of non-degenerate projective varieties with non-zero prolongation and application to target rigidity. Invent. Math. 189, 457–513 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    T. Fujita, Classification Theory of Polarized Varieties. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 155 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    T. Fujita, J. Roberts, Varieties with small secant varieties: the extremal case. Am. J. Math. 103, 953–976 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    W. Fulton, Intersection Theory. Ergebnisse der Math. (Springer, Berlin, New York, 1984)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    W. Fulton, On the topology of algebraic varieties. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 46, 15–46 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    W. Fulton, J. Hansen, A connectedness theorem for projective varieties, with applications to intersections and singularities of mappings. Ann. Math. 110, 159–166 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    W. Fulton, R. Lazarsfeld, Connectivity and Its Applications in Algebraic Geometry. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 862 (Springer, New York, 1981), pp. 26–92Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    D. Gallarati, Sopra una particolare classe di varietà, ed una proprietà caratteristica delle V r razionali rappresentabili sul sistema lineare di tutte le quadriche di S r. Rend. Semin. Mat. Torino 15, 267–280 (1955–1956)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    A. Garbagnati, F. Repetto, A geometrical approach to Gordan–Noether’s and Franchetta’s contributions to a question posed by Hesse. Collect. Math. 60, 27–41 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    C.F. Gauss, Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas. Collected works, vol. 4, reprint of the 1873 original, (Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, 1973)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    A.V. Geramita, T. Harima, J.C. Migliore, Y.S. Shin, The Hilbert function of a level algebra. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 186(872), 139 pp. (2007)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    N. Goldstein, Ampleness and connectedness in complex GP. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 274, 361–373 (1982)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    R. Gondim, On higher hessians and the Lefschetz properties. arXiv: 1506.06387Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    R. Gondim, F. Russo, Cubic hypersurfaces with vanishing hessian. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219, 779–806 (2015), see the corrected version as arXiv: 1312.1618Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    P. Gordan, M. Nöther, Ueber die algebraischen Formen, deren Hesse’sche Determinante identisch verschwindet. Math. Ann. 10, 547–568 (1876)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    P. Griffiths, J. Harris, Algebraic geometry and local differential geometry. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 12, 355–432 (1979)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    A. Grothendieck, Cohomologie locale des faisceaux cohérents et théorèmes de Lefschetz locaux et globaux. Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique (1962) (Publisher North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1968)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    A. Grothendieck, Techniques de construction et théorèmes d’existence en géométrie algébrique IV: les schemas de Hilbert. Seminaire Bourbaki, 1960/61, Exp. 221, Asterisque hors serie 6, Soc. Math. Fr. (1997)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    K. Han, Classification of secant defective manifolds near the extremal case. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142, 39–46 (2014)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    T. Harima, T. Maeno, H. Morita, Y. Numata, A. Wachi, J. Watanabe, The Lefschetz Properties. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2080 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013), xx + 250 pp.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    J. Harris, A bound on the geometric genus of projective varieties. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 8, 35–68 (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    J. Harris, Algebraic Geometry, A First Course. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 133 (Springer, Berlin, 1992)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    R. Hartshorne, Ample Subvarieties of Algebraic Varieties. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 156 (Springer, Berlin, 1970)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    R. Hartshorne, Varieties of small codimension in projective space. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 80, 1017–1032 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52 (Springer, New York, 1977)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    R. Hartshorne, Deformation Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 257 (Springer, New York, 2010)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    O. Hesse, Über die Bedingung, unter welche eine homogene ganze Function von n unabhángigen Variabeln durch Lineäre Substitutionen von n andern unabhángigenVariabeln auf eine homogene Function sich zurück-führen lässt, die eine Variable weniger enthält. J. Reine Angew. Math. 42, 117–124 (1851)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    O. Hesse, Zur Theorie der ganzen homogenen Functionen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 56, 263–269 (1859)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    A. Holme, J. Roberts, Zak’s theorem on superadditivity. Ark. Mat. 32, 99–120 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    J.M. Hwang, Geometry of minimal rational curves on fano manifolds, in “Vanishing Theorems and Effective Results in Algebraic Geometry”. I.C.T.P. Lecture Notes, vol. 6 (2001), pp. 335–393Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    J.M. Hwang, S. Kebekus, Geometry of chains of minimal rational curves. J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelle’s J.) 584, 173–194 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    J.M. Hwang, N. Mok, Rigidity of irreducible Hermitian symmetric spaces of the compact type under Kähler deformation. Invent. Math. 131, 393–418 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    J.M. Hwang, N. Mok, Birationality of the tangent map for minimal rational curves. Asian J. Math. 8, 51–63 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    J.M. Hwang, N. Mok, Prolongations of infinitesimal linear automorphisms of projective varieties and rigidity of rational homogeneous spaces of Picard number 1 under Kähler deformation. Invent. Math. 160, 591–645 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    J.M. Hwang, K. Yamaguchi, Characterization of Hermitian symmetric spaces by fundamental forms. Duke Math. J. 120, 621–634 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    P. Ionescu, Embedded Projective Varieties of Small Invariants. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1056 (Springer, New York, 1984), pp. 142–186Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    P. Ionescu, Birational geometry of rationally connected manifolds via quasi-lines, in Projective Varieties with Unexpected Properties (Siena, 2004), de Gruyter, 2005, pp. 317–335Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    P. Ionescu, On manifolds of small degree. Comment. Math. Helv. 83, 927–940 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    P. Ionescu, D. Naie, Rationality properties of manifolds containing quasi-lines. Int. J. Math. 14, 1053–1080 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    P. Ionescu, F. Russo, Varieties with quadratic entry locus, II. Compos. Math. 144, 949–962 (2008)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    P. Ionescu, F. Russo, Conic-connected manifolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. 644, 145–158 (2010)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    P. Ionescu, F. Russo, Manifolds covered by lines and the Hartshorne Conjecture for quadratic manifolds. Am. J. Math. 135, 349–360 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    P. Ionescu, F. Russo, On dual defective manifolds. Math. Res. Lett. 21, 1137–1154 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    T.A. Ivey, J.M. Landsberg, Cartan for Beginners: Differential Geometry via Moving Frames and Exterior Differential Systems. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 61 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003)Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    N. Jacobson, Structure and Representations of Jordan Algebras. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. XXXIX (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1968)Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    K. Johnson, Immersion and embedding of projective varieties. Acta Math. 140, 49–74 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    P. Jordan, J. von Neumann, E. Wigner, On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism. Ann. Math. 36, 29–64 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    J.P. Jouanolou, Théorèmes de Bertini et applications. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 42 (Birkäuser, Boston, 1983)Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Y. Kachi, E. Sato, Segre’s reflexivity and an inductive characterization of hyperquadrics. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 160 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002)Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    G. Kempf, Algebraic Varieties. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note, vol. 172 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    S.L. Kleiman, Concerning the dual variety, in Proceedings 18th Scandinavian Congress of Mathematicians (Aarhus 1980). Progress in Mathematics, vol. 11 (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1981), pp. 386–396Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    S.L. Kleiman, Tangency and duality, in Proceedings of the 1984 Vancouver Conference in Algebraic Geometry, Canadian Mathematical Society Conference Proceedings, vol. 6 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1986), pp. 163–225Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    J. Kollár, Rational Curves on Algebraic Varieties. Erg. der Math, vol. 32 (Springer, Berlin, 1996)Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    J. Kollár, Y. Miyaoka, S. Mori, Rationally connected varieties. J. Algebraic Geom. 1, 429–448 (1992)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    T.Y. Lam, Introduction to Quadratic Forms over Fields. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 67 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005)Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    J.M. Landsberg, On degenerate secant and tangential varieties and local differential geometry. Duke Math. J. 85, 605–634 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    J.M. Landsberg, On the infinitesimal rigidity of homogeneous varieties. Compos. Math. 118, 189–201 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    J.M. Landsberg, Griffiths–Harris rigidity of compact Hermitian symmetric spaces. J. Diff. Geom. 74, 395–405 (2006)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    J.M. Landsberg, C. Robbles, Fubini–Griffiths–Harris rigidity of homogeneous varieties. Int. Math. Res. Not. 7, 1643–1664 (2012)Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    H. Lange, Higher secant varieties of curves and the theorem of Nagata on ruled surfaces. Manuscripta Math. 47, 263–269 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    R.K. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I, II. Erg. der Math. vols. 48 and 49 (Springer, Berlin, 2004)Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    R. Lazarsfeld, A. van de Ven, Topics in the Geometry of Projective Space, Recent Work by F.L. Zak. DMV Seminar 4 (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984)Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    S. Lefschetz, On certain numerical invariants of algebraic varieties. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 22, 326–363 (1921)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    C. Lossen, When does the Hessian determinant vanish identically? (On Gordan and Noether’s Proof of Hesse’s Claim). Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 35, 71–82 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    T. Maeno, J. Watanabe, Lefschetz elements of Artinian Gorenstein algebras and hessians of homogeneous polynomials. Illinois J. Math. 53, 591–603 (2009)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    D. Martinelli, J.C. Naranjo, G.P. Pirola, Connectedness Bertini Theorem via numerical equivalence. arXiv: 1412.1978Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    H. Matsumura, Commutative Algebra, 2nd edn. (The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, San Francisco, 1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    K. McCrimmon, Axioms for inversion in Jordan algebras. J. Algebra 47, 201–222 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    K. McCrimmon, Jordan algebras and their applications. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 84, 612–627 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    K. McCrimmon, Adjoints and Jordan algebras. Commun. Algebra 13, 2567–2596 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    K. McCrimmon, A taste of Jordan algebras. Universitext (Springer, New York, 2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    N. Mok, Recognizing certain rational homogeneous manifolds of Picard number 1 from their varieties of minimal rational tangents, in Third International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians. Part 1, 2. AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 42, pt.1, 2 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008), pp. 41–61Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    S. Mori, Projective manifolds with ample tangent bundle. Ann. Math. 110, 593–606 (1979)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    S. Mori, Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective. Ann. Math. 116, 133–176 (1982)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    S. Mukai, Biregular classification of Fano threefolds and Fano manifolds of coindex 3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 3000–3002 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    S. Mukai, Simple Lie algebra and Legendre variety. Preprint (1998), http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~mukai
  140. 140.
    D. Mumford, Varieties defined by quadratic equations, in Questions on Algebraic Varieties (C.I.M.E., III Ciclo, Varenna, 1969) (Ed. Cremonese, Rome, 1970), pp. 2 9–100Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    D. Mumford, Some footnotes to the work of C.P. Ramanujam, in C.P. Ramanujam—A Tribute (Springer, New York, 1978), pp. 247–262Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    D. Mumford, The Red Book of Varieties and Schemes. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1358 (Springer, Berlin, 1988)Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    O. Nash, K-Theory, LQEL-manifolds and Severi varieties. Geom. Topol. 18, 1245–1260 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    N.Y. Netsvetaev, Projective Varieties Defined by a Small Number of Equations are Complete Intersections. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1346 (Springer, Berlin, 1988), pp. 433–453Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    M. Ohno, On degenerate secant varieties whose Gauss map have the largest image. Pac. J. Math. 187, 151–175 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    M. Oka, On the cohomology structure of projective varieties, in Manifolds—Tokyo, 1973 (University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1975), pp. 137–143Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    F. Palatini, Sulle superficie algebriche i cui S h (h + 1)-seganti non riempiono lo spazio ambiente. Atti Accad. Torino 41, 634–640 (1906)MATHGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    F. Palatini, Sulle varietá algebriche per le quali sono minori dell’ ordinario, senza riempire lo spazio ambiente, una o alcune delle varietá formate da spazi seganti. Atti Accad. Torino 44, 362–375 (1909)MATHGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    I. Pan, F. Ronga, T. Vust, Transformations birationelles quadratiques de l’espace projectif complexe à trois dimensions. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 51, 1153–1187 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    R. Pardini, Some remarks on plane curves over fields of finite characteristic. Compos. Math. 60, 3–17 (1986)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    U. Perazzo, Sulle varietá cubiche la cui hessiana svanisce identicamente. G. Mat. Battaglini 38, 337–354 (1900)MATHGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    R. Permutti, Su certe forme a hessiana indeterminata. Ricerche di Mat. 6, 3–10 (1957)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    R. Permutti, Su certe classi di forme a hessiana indeterminata. Ricerche di Mat. 13, 97–105 (1964)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    L. Pirio, F. Russo, On projective varieties n-covered by irreducible curves of degree δ. Comment. Math. Helv. 88, 715–756 (2013)Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    L. Pirio, F. Russo, Quadro-quadric Cremona maps and varieties 3-connected by cubics: semi-simple part and radical. Int. J. Math. 24, 13, 33 (2013). doi: 10.1142/S0129167X1350105X 1350105Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    L. Pirio, F. Russo, The XJC-correspondence. J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelle’s J.) (to appear, DOI 10.1515/crelle-2014-0052)Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    L. Pirio, F. Russo, Quadro-quadric cremona transformations in low dimensions via the JC-correspondence. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 64, 71–111 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    L. Pirio, J.-M. Trépreau, Sur les variétés \(X \subset \mathbb{P}^{N}\) telles que par n points passe une courbe de degré donné. Bull. Soc. Math. France 141, 131–196 (2013)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    F. Russo, On a theorem of Severi. Math. Ann. 316, 1–17 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    F. Russo, Varieties with quadratic entry locus, I. Math. Ann. 344, 597–617 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    F. Russo, Lines on projective varieties and applications. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 61, 47–64 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    F. Russo, A. Simis, On birational maps and Jacobian matrices. Compos. Math. 126, 335–358 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    G. Scorza, Sulla determinazione delle varietá a tre dimensioni di S r (r ≥ 7) i cui S 3 tangenti si tagliano a due a due. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 25, 193–204 (1908)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    G. Scorza, Un problema sui sistemi lineari di curve appartenenti a una superficie algebrica. Rend. Reale Ist. Lombardo Scienze e Lettere 41, 913–920 (1908)MATHGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    G. Scorza, Le varietá a curve sezioni ellittiche. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 15, 217–273 (1908)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    G. Scorza, Sulle varietá a quattro dimensioni di S r (r ≥ 9) i cui S 4 tangenti si tagliano a due a due. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 27, 148–178 (1909)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    G. Scorza, Corpi numerici e algebre (Casa Editrice Giuseppe Principato, Messina, 1921)Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    G. Scorza, Opere Scelte, I–IV (Edizioni Cremonese, Roma, 1960)Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    C. Segre, Sulle varietà normali a tre dimensioni composte da serie semplici di piani. Atti della R. Acc. delle Scienze di Torino 21, 95–115 (1885)Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    B. Segre, Bertini forms and Hessian matrices. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 26, 164–176 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    B. Segre, Some Properties of Differentiable Varieties and Transformations. Erg. Math. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1957)Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    B. Segre, Sull’ hessiano di taluni polinomi (determinanti, pfaffiani, discriminanti, risultanti, hessiani) I, II. Atti Acc. Lincei 37, 109–117, 215–221 (1964)Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    J.G. Semple, On representations of the S k’s of S n and of the Grassmann manifold \(\mathbb{G}(k,n)\). Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 32, 200–221 (1931)Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    J.G. Semple, L. Roth, Introduction to Algebraic Geometry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1949 and 1986)Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    E. Sernesi, Deformations of Algebraic Schemes. Grund. der Math. Wiss., vol. 334 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006)Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    F. Severi, Intorno ai punti doppi impropri di una superficie generale dello spazio a quattro dimensioni e ai suoi punti tripli apparenti. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 15, 33–51 (1901)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    F. Severi, Una proprietà delle forme algebriche prive di punti multipli. Rend. Acc. Lincei 15, 691–696 (1906)MATHGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    I.R. Shafarevich, Basic Algebraic Geometry (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1974)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    A. Simis, B. Ulrich, W.V. Vasconcelos, Tangent star cones. J. Reine Angew. Math. 483, 23–59 (1997)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    N. Spampinato, I gruppi di affinità e di trasformazioni quadratiche piane legati alle due algebre complesse doppie dotate di modulo. Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania 67, 80–86 (1935)MATHGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    G. Staglianò, On special quadratic birational transformations of a projective space into a hypersurface. Rend. del Circolo Mat. Palermo 61, 403–429 (2012)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    G. Staglianò, On special quadratic birational transformations whose base locus has dimension at most three. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. 24, 409–436 (2013)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    R.P. Stanley, Weyl groups, the hard Lefschetz theorem, and the Sperner property. SIAM J. Algebra. Discr. Methods 1(2), 168–184 (1980)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    E. Strickland, Lines in GP. Math. Z. 242, 227–240 (2002)Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    A. Terracini, Sulle V k per cui la varieta’ degli S h (h + 1)-secanti ha dimensione minore dell’ ordinario. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 31, 392–396 (1911)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    A. Terracini, Su due problemi concernenti la determinazione di alcune classi di superficie, considerate da G. Scorza e F. Palatini. Atti Soc. Natur. e Matem. Modena 6, 3–16 (1921–1922)Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    A. Terracini, Alcune questioni sugli spazi tangenti e osculatori ad una varietá, I, II, III, in Selecta Alessandro Terracini, vol. I (Edizioni Cremonese, Roma, 1968), pp. 24–90Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    P. Vermeire, Some results on secant varieties leading to a geometric flip construction. Compos. Math. 125, 263–282 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    G. Veronese, Behandlung der projectivischen Verhältnisse der Räume von verschiedenen Dimensionen durch das Princip des Prjjicirens und Schneidens. Math. Ann. 19, 161–234 (1882)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    A.H. Wallace, Tangency and duality over arbitrary fields. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 6, 321–342 (1956)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    A.H. Wallace, Tangency properties of algebraic varieties, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 7, 549–567 (1957)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    J. Watanabe, A remark on the Hessian of homogeneous polynomials, in The Curves Seminar at Queen’s, vol. XIII. Queen’s Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 119 (Queens Univ. Campus, Kingston, 2000), pp. 171–178Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    J. Watanabe, On the theory of Gordan–Noether on homogeneous forms with zero Hessian. Proc. Sch. Sci. Tokai Univ. 49, 1–21 (2014)MATHGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    H. Weyl, Emmy Noether. Scr. Math. 3, 201–220 (1935)MATHGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    J. Wiśniewski, On a conjecture of Mukai. Manuscripta Math. 68, 135–141 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    F.L. Zak, Severi varieties. Math. USSR Sbornik 54, 113–127 (1986)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    F.L. Zak, Some Properties of Dual Varieties and Their Applications in Projective Geometry. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1479 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1991), pp. 273–280Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    F.L. Zak, Tangents and secants of algebraic varieties. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 127 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Russo
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica e InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations