Physarum Wires, Sensors and Oscillators

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Emergence, Complexity and Computation book series (ECC, volume 21)

Abstract

To make an electronic wetware device doing something useful we need sensors to input information, wires to transfer information between distant parts of the devices, and an oscillator to act as a clock and synchronise the device. We show how slime mould wires, optical colour and tactile sensors and oscillators can be made. A Physarum wire is a protoplasmic tube. Given two pins to be connected by a wire, we place a piece of slime mould at one pin and an attractant at another pin. Physarum propagates towards the attractant and thus connects the pins with a protoplasmic tube. A protoplasmic tube is conductive, it can survive substantial over-voltage and can be used to transfer electrical current to electronic loads. We demonstrate experimental approaches towards programmable routing of Physarum wires with chemoattractants and electrical fields, show how to grow the slime mould wires on almost bare breadboards and electronic circuits, and insulate the Physarum. We evaluate feasibility of slime-mould based colour sensors by illuminating Physarum with red, green, blue and white colours and analysing patterns of the slime mould’s electrical potential oscillations. We define that the slime mould recognises a colour if it reacts to illumination with the colour by a unique changes in amplitude and periods of oscillatory activity. In laboratory experiments we found that the slime mould recognises red and blue colour. The slime mould does not differentiate between green and white colours. The slime mould also recognises when red colour is switched off. We also map colours to diversity of the oscillations: illumination with a white colour increases diversity of amplitudes and periods of oscillations, other colours studied increase diversity either of amplitude or period. We design experimental laboratory implementation of a slime mould based tactile bristles, where the slime mould responds to repeated deflection of bristle by an immediate high-amplitude spike and a prolonged increase in amplitude and width of its oscillation impulses. We demonstrate that signal strength of the Physarum tactile bristle sensor averages near six for an immediate response and two for a prolonged response. Finally, we show how to make an electronic oscillator from the slime mould. The slime mould oscillator is made of two electrodes connected by a protoplasmic tube of the living slime mould. A protoplasmic tube has an average resistance of 3 MOhm. The tube’s resistance is changing over time due to peristaltic contractile activity of the tube. The resistance of the protoplasmic tube oscillates with average period of 73 s and average amplitude of 0.6 MOhm. We present experimental laboratory results on dynamics of Physarum oscillator under direct current voltage up to 15 V and speculate that slime mould P. polycephalum can be employed as a living electrical oscillator in biological and hybrid circuits.

Keywords

Average Amplitude Ionic Polymer Metal Composite Potential Oscillation Slime Mould Physarum Polycephalum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamatzky, A.: Steering plasmodium with light: dynamical programming of physarum machine. arXiv:0908.0850 (2009)
  2. 2.
    Adamatzky, A.: Physarum wires: self-growing self-repairing smart wires made from slime mould. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 3(4), 232–241 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adamatzky, A.: Towards slime mould colour sensor: recognition of colours by Physarum polycephalum. Org. Electron. 14(12), 3355–3361 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adamatzky, A.: Slime mould electronic oscillators. Microelectron. Eng. 124, 58–65 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adamatzky, A.: Tactile bristle sensors made with slime mold. Sensors J. IEEE 14(2), 324–332 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adamatzky, A., Jones, J.: On electrical correlates of Physarum polycephalum spatial activity: can we see physarum machine in the dark? Biophys. Rev. Lett. 6(01n02):29–57 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson, J.D.: Galvanotaxis of slime mold. J. Gen. Physiol. 35(1), 1–16 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barth, F.G.: Spider mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14(4), 415–422 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beratan, D.N., Priyadarshy, S., Risser, S.M.: DNA: insulator or wire? Chem. Biol. 4(1), 3–8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berry, V., Saraf, R.F.: Self-assembly of nanoparticles on live bacterium: an avenue to fabricate electronic devices. Angewandte Chemie 117(41), 6826–6831 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bialczyk, J.: An action spectrum for light avoidance by Physarum nudum plasmodia. Photochem. Photobiol. 30(2), 301–303 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Block, I., Wohlfarth-Bottermann, K.E.: Blue light as a medium to influence oscillatory contraction frequency in Physarum. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 5(1), 73–81 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cingolani, E., Ionta, V., Giacomello, A., Marbán, E., Cho, H.C.: Creation of a biological wire using cell-targeted paramagnetic beads. Biophys. J. 102(3), 416a (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cutkosky, M.R., Kim, S.: Design and fabrication of multi-material structures for bioinspired robots. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 367(1894):1799–1813 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dahiya, R.S., Valle, M., Metta, G., Lorenzelli, L.: Bio-inspired tactile sensing arrays. In: SPIE Europe Microtechnologies for the New Millennium, pp. 73650D–73650D. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engel, J., Chen, N., Chen, N., Pandya, S., Liu, C.: Multi-walled carbon nanotube filled conductive elastomers: materials and application to micro transducers. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2006. MEMS 2006 Istanbul, pp 246–249. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Engel, J.M., Chen, J., Liu, C., Bullen, D.: Polyurethane rubber all-polymer artificial hair cell sensor. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 15(4), 729–736 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geddes, L.A., Baker, L.E.: The specific resistance of biological materiala compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med. Biol. Eng. 5(3), 271–293 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guttes, E., Guttes, S., Rusch, H.P.: Morphological observations on growth and differentiation of Physarum polycephalum grown in pure culture. Dev. Biol. 3(5), 588–614 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Häder, D.-P., Schreckenbach, T.: Phototactic orientation in plasmodia of the acellular slime mold, Physarum polycephalum. Plant Cell Physiol. 25(1), 55–61 (1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hamed, A.M., Tse, Z.T.H., Young, I., Davies, B.L., Lampérth, M.: Applying tactile sensing with piezoelectric materials for minimally invasive surgery and magnetic-resonance-guided interventions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H: J. Eng. Med. 223(1), 99–110 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hildebrandt, A.: A morphogen for the sporulation of Physarum polycephalum detected by cell fusion experiments. Exp. Cell Res. 167(2), 453–457 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horowitz, P., Hill, W.: The Art of Electronics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iwamura, T.: Correlations between protoplasmic streaming and bioelectric potential of a slime mold, Physarum polycephalum. Bot. Mag. 62(735–736), 126–131 (1949)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kakiuchi, Y., Takahashi, T., Murakami, A., Ueda, T.: Light irradiation induces fragmentation of the plasmodium, a novel photomorphogenesis in the true slime mold physarum polycephalum: action spectra and evidence for involvement of the phytochrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 73(3), 324–329 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamiya, N., Abe, S.: Bioelectric phenomena in the myxomycete plasmodium and their relation to protoplasmic flow. J. Colloid Sci. 5(2), 149–163 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kato, Y., Mukai, T., Hayakawa, T., Shibata, T.: Tactile sensor without wire and sensing element in the tactile region based on EIT method. In: Sensors, 2007 IEEE, pp. 792–795. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knowles, D.J.C., Carlile, M.J.: The chemotactic response of plasmodia of the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum to sugars and related compounds. J. General Microbiol. 108(1), 17–25 (1978)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lucarotti, C., Oddo, C.M., Vitiello, N., Carrozza, M.C.: Synthetic and bio-artificial tactile sensing: a review. Sensors 13(2):1435–1466 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Merck, V.: An encyclopaedia of chemicals, drugs and biologicals. In: The Merck Index, pp. 3737 (1995)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyer, R., Stockem, W.: Studies on microplasmodia of Physarum polycephalum V: electrical activity of different types of microplasmodia and macroplasmodia. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 3(4), 321–330 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mukai, T., Hirano, S., Kato, Y.: Fast and accurate tactile sensor system for a human-interactive robot. INTECH Open Access Publisher (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nakagaki, T., Yamada, H., Ueda, T.: Modulation of cellular rhythm and photoavoidance by oscillatory irradiation in the Physarum plasmodium. Biophys. Chem. 82(1), 23–28 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ohmukai, M., Kami, Y., Matsuura, R.: Electrode for force sensor of conductive rubber (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Park, Y.-L., Chen, B.-R., Wood, R.J.: Soft artificial skin with multi-modal sensing capability using embedded liquid conductors. In: Sensors, 2011 IEEE, pp. 81–84. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Park, Y.-L., Majidi, C., Kramer, R., Bérard, P., Wood, R.J.: Hyperelastic pressure sensing with a liquid-embedded elastomer. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(12), 125029 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rocha, J.G., Lanceros-Mendez, S.: Sensors: Focus on Tactile Force and Stress Sensors. wwwSciyo.com (2008)
  38. 38.
    Sabah, A., Dakua, I., Kumar, P., Mohammed, W.S., Dutta, J.: Growth of templated gold microwires by self organization of colloids on Aspergillus niger. Digest J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 7, 583–591 (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sauer, H.W., Babcock, K.L., Rusch, H.P.: Sporulation in Physarum polycephalum: a model system for studies on differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 57(2), 319–327 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schreckenbach, T., Walckhoff, B., Verfuerth, C.: Blue-light receptor in a white mutant of Physarum polycephalum mediates inhibition of spherulation and regulation of glucose metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78(2), 1009–1013 (1981)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Starostzik, C., Marwan, W.: A photoreceptor with characteristics of phytochrome triggers sporulation in the true slime mould Physarum polycephalum. FEBS Lett. 370(1), 146–148 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sun, T., Tsuda, S., Zauner, K.-P., Morgan, H.: Single cell imaging using electrical impedance tomography. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, 2009. NEMS 2009, pp. 858–863. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sun, T., Tsuda, S., Zauner, K.-P., Morgan, H.: On-chip electrical impedance tomography for imaging biological cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 25(5), 1109–1115 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tiwana, M.I., Redmond, S.J., Lovell, N.H.: A review of tactile sensing technologies with applications in biomedical engineering. Sensors Actuators A: Phys. 179, 17–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tsuda, S., Jones, J., Adamatzky, A., Mills, J.: Routing Physarum with electrical flow/current. arXiv:1204.1752 (2012)
  46. 46.
    Ueda, T., Mori, Y., Kobatake, Y.: Patterns in the distribution of intracellular atp concentration in relation to coordination of amoeboid cell behavior in Physarum polycephalum. Exp. Cell Res. 169(1), 191–201 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang, C., Pålsson, L.-O., Batsanov, A.S., Bryce, M.R.: Molecular wires comprising \(\pi \)-extended ethynyl-and butadiynyl-2, 5-diphenyl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazole derivatives: synthesis, redox, structural, and optoelectronic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(11), 3789–3799 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang, J., Xu, C., Taya, M., Kuga, Y.: Bio-inspired tactile sensor with arrayed structures based on electroactive polymers. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, pp. 69271B–69271B (2008) International Society for Optics and Photonics (2008)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wettels, N., Santos, V.J., Johansson, R.S., Loeb, G.E.: Biomimetic tactile sensor array. Adv. Robot. 22(8), 829–849 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wohlfarth-Bottermann, K.E., Block, I.: The pathway of photosensory transduction in Physarum polycephalum. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 5(4), 365–373 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wolf, R., Niemuth, J., Sauer, H.: Thermotaxis and protoplasmic oscillations in Physarum plasmodia analysed in a novel device generating stable linear temperature gradients. Protoplasma 197(1–2), 121–131 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wong, R.D.P., Posner, J.D., Santos, V.J.: Flexible microfluidic normal force sensor skin for tactile feedback. Sensors Actuators A: Phys. 179, 62–69 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unconventional Computing CentreUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations