Advertisement

Proportional Cost Buyback Problem with Weight Bounds

  • Yasushi Kawase
  • Xin Han
  • Kazuhisa Makino
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9486)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the proportional cost buyback problem. The input is a sequence of elements \(e_1,e_2,\dots ,e_n\), each of which has a weight \(w(e_i)\). We assume that weights have an upper and a lower bound, i.e., \(l\le w(e_i)\le u\) for any \(i\). Given the ith element \(e_i\), we either accept \(e_i\) or reject it with no cost, subject to some constraint on the set of accepted elements. During the iterations, we could cancel some previously accepted elements at a cost that is proportional to the total weight of them. Our goal is to maximize the profit, i.e., the sum of the weights of elements kept until the end minus the total cancellation cost occurred. We consider the matroid and unweighted knapsack constraints. For either case, we construct optimal online algorithms and prove that they are the best possible.

Keywords

Knapsack Problem Competitive Ratio Element Weight Knapsack Constraint Weight Bound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26887014 and JST, ERATO, Kawarabayashi Large Graph Project. The second author is supported by NFSC(11571060), RGC (HKU716412E) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT15LK10). The last author is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashwinkumar, B.V.: Buyback problem - approximate matroid intersection with cancellation costs. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Colloquium on Automata, Language and Programming (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashwinkumar, B.V., Kleinberg, R.: Randomized online algorithms for the buyback problem. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 529–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babaioff, M., Hartline, J.D., Kleinberg, R.D.: Selling banner ads: online algorithms with buyback. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Ad Auctions (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babaioff, M., Hartline, J.D., Kleinberg, R.D.: Selling ad campaigns: online algorithms with cancellations. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 61–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biyalogorsky, E., Carmon, Z., Fruchter, G.E., Gerstner, E.: Research note: overselling with opportunistic cancellations. Marketing Science 18(4), 605–610 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchbinder, N., Feldman, M., Schwartz, R.: Online submodular maximization with preemption. In: Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1202–1216 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Constantin, F., Feldman, J., Muthukrishnan, S., Pál, M.: An online mechanism for ad slot reservations with cancellations. In: Proceedings of the twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1265–1274 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han, X., Kawase, Y., Makino, K.: Randomized algorithms for removable online knapsack problems. In: Frontiers in Algorithmics and Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, X., Kawase, Y., Makino, K.: Online unweighted knapsack problem with removal cost. Algorithmica 70, 76–91 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, X., Kawase, Y., Makino, K., Guo, H.: Online knapsack problem under convex function. Theor. Comput. Sci. 540–5419, 62–69 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, X., Makino, K.: Online minimization knapsack problem. In: Bampis, E., Jansen, K. (eds.) WAOA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5893, pp. 182–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iwama, K., Taketomi, S.: Removable online knapsack problems. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, p. 293. Springer, Heidelberg (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iwama, K., Zhang, G.: Optimal resource augmentations for online knapsack. In: Charikar, M., Jansen, K., Reingold, O., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) RANDOM 2007 and APPROX 2007. LNCS, vol. 4627, pp. 180–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawase, Y., Han, X., Makino, K.: Unit cost buyback problem. In: Cai, L., Cheng, S.-W., Lam, T.-W. (eds.) Algorithms and Computation. LNCS, vol. 8283, pp. 435–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, Y., Chakrabarty, D., Lukose, R.: Budget constrained bidding in keyword auctions and online knapsack problems. In: Papadimitriou, C., Zhang, S. (eds.) WINE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5385, pp. 566–576. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Software SchoolDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  3. 3.Research Institute for Mathematical ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations