Risk and Risk Management

  • Adrian Stavert-Dobson
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Risk comes in many forms and how we perceive it affects what we are prepared to tolerate. The implementation of Health IT itself is associated with different varieties of risk (e.g. security, reputational, financial as well as clinical). Differentiating these allows us to manage them using the most appropriate techniques. The language we use to derive and quantify risk needs to be precise and consistent in order for practitioners to meaningfully debate and evaluate its degree. This chapter examines the nature of risk, the terms used to describe it and the techniques we can harness to quantify it objectively.

Keywords

Risk Risk management Clinical risk Risk evaluation Risk matrix Risk estimation Hazard Severity Likelihood Consequence 

References

  1. 1.
    Lowrance W. Of acceptable risk: science and the determination of safety. Los Altos: W. Kaufman; 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. A promise to learn – a commitment to act. Improving the safety of patients in England. Br Med J. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_Report.pdf.
  3. 3.
    Wald H, Shojania K. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. July 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oxford English Dictionary. [Online]; 2015. Available from: http://www.oed.com/.
  5. 5.
    International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000:2009, Risk management – Principles and guidelines. 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 1978;9:127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Health and Safety Executive. Reducing risks, protecting people. HSE’s decision making process. 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999. 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TC 215 N1143 – ISO/DTR 17791 – Health informatics — guidance on standards for enabling safety in health software. 2013.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paté-Cornell M. The engineering risk analysis method and some applications. Chapter 16. [Online]. [cited June 2015; http://www.usc.edu/dept/create/assets/002/50856.pdf]. Available from: http://www.usc.edu/dept/create/assets/002/50856.pdf.
  11. 11.
    International Organization for Standardization. EN ISO 14971:2012. Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices. 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UK National Patient Safety Agency. A risk matrix for risk managers. London: UK National Patient Safety Agency; 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 25238:2007 (Health informatics – classification of safety risks from health software). Technical Specification. 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC/TR 80002-1:2009. Medical device software, Part 1, Guidance on the application of ISO 14971 to medical device software. 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Stavert-Dobson
    • 1
  1. 1.SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations