Developing Control Strategies

  • Adrian Stavert-Dobson
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Controls are put in place to reduce clinical risk. The safety case needs to evidence both the presence of controls and their effectiveness, but some controls are better than others in achieving risk reduction. At one end of the scale are those controls which are deliberately included in the system’s design to encourage or force users to take a safe course of action. In contrast, those controls which rely on the provision of information and user training are less likely to be effective. Controls can of course introduce risk in their own right and where risk reduction measures compromise usability or performance then a careful balance needs to be struck. This chapter examines the relative effectiveness of controls and looks at what can be done to improve the success of those mitigations reliant on user training.

Keywords

Controls Mitigations Control hierarchy Control effectiveness Elimination Substitution Engineered controls Administrative controls Information provision User training Adult learning Control validation 

References

  1. 1.
    Health and Safety Executive. Management of risk when planning work: the right priorities. Head office for HSE is Merseyside, UK. http://www.hse.gov.uk/construction/lwit/assets/downloads/hierarchy-risk-controls.pdf.
  2. 2.
    Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. 1984. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. ISBN-10:0132952610.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohan V, Gold J. Collaborative intelligent case design model to facilitate simulated testing of clinical cognitive load. Portland: Oregon Health and Science University; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Stavert-Dobson
    • 1
  1. 1.SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations