The Pros and Cons of XBRL Adoption in Italy: A Field Study

  • Francesco Avallone
  • Paola Ramassa
  • Elisa Roncagliolo
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 14)

Abstract

Our study responds to the call for more field-based research on XBRL focusing on the effects of its adoption with regard to: (i) knowledge and actual direct use of XBRL; (ii) existing limitations and future necessary improvements; and (iii) actual costs and benefits. In pursuit of these objectives, we have carried out a descriptive study based on interviews with different actors involved in the financial communication process in Italy, where the XBRL filing of financial statements has been mandatory for unlisted companies since 2009. Results suggest that five years of adoption have not led to a widespread awareness of XBRL features and potential benefits among professionals. Moreover, interviews highlight that so far the XBRL mandatory adoption has not achieved an overall substantial impact on real practice yet, if we exclude some financial statement users (e.g. financial analysts). Our findings have relevant implications for regulators, users, and companies as well.

Keywords

XBRL Information systems Financial reporting Field research 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Debreceny, R., Gray, G.L.: The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the internet: XML and XBRL. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2, 47–74 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonsón, E.: The role of XBRL in Europe. Int. J. Digit. Account. Res. 1, 101–110 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonsón, E., Cortijo, V., Escobar, T.: Towards the global adoption of XBRL using international financial reporting standards (IFRS). Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 10, 46–60 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinsker, R., Li, S.: Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: early evidence. Commun. ACM 51, 47–50 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hodge, F.D., Kennedy, J.J., Maines, L.A.: Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting? Acc. Rev. 79, 687–703 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baldwin, A.A., Trinkle, B.S.: The impact of XBRL: a delphi investigation. Int. J. Digital Account. Res. 11, 1–24 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doni, F., Inghirami, I.E.: Strategy Management Systems e XBRL: mutui rapporti e interconnessioni. In: Zambon, S. (ed.) XBRL e informativa aziendale. Traiettorie, innovazioni e sfide, Part III, pp. 286–311. Franco Angeli, Milano (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piechocki, M., Felden, C., Gräning, A., Debreceny, R.: Design and standardisation of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency. Int. J. Discl. Gov. 6, 224–240 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ward, G.: How XBRL can enhance the credibility of audited financial statements. IFAC, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boritz, E.J., No, W.G.: Security in XML-based financial reporting services on the internet. J. Account. Public Policy 24, 11–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pinsker, R.: XBRL awareness in auditing: a sleeping giant? Manag. Auditing J. 18, 732–736 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, C., Wang, T., Yao, L.J.: XBRL’s impact on analyst forecast behavior: an empirical study. J. Account. Public Policy 33, 69–82 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Efendi, J., Park, J.D., Smith, L.M.: Do XBRL filings enhance informational efficiency? Early evidence from post-earnings announcement drift. J. Bus. Res. 67, 1099–1105 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoon, H., Zo, H., Ciganek, A.P.: Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry? J. Bus. Res. 64, 157–163 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, J.W., Lim, J.-H., No, W.G.: The effect of first wave mandatory XBRL reporting across the financial information environment. J. Inf. Syst. 26, 127–153 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, C., Luo, X.R., Sia, C.L., O’Farrell, G., Teo, H.H.: The impact of XBRL adoption in PR China. Decis. Support Syst. 59, 242–249 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alles, M., Debreceny, R.: The evolution and future of XBRL research. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 13, 83–90 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dunne, T., Helliar, C., Lymer, A., Mousa, R.: Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK. Br. Account. Rev. 45, 167–182 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ossevatorio ICT&Professionisti: Se parliamo di Professionisti, in realtà, parliamo di imprese! Politecnico di Milano (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hopwood, A.G.: On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Acc. Organ. Soc. 8, 287–305 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rubin, H.J., Rubin, I.S.: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCracken, G.: The long interview. Sage University Paper Series on Qualitative Research Methods. Beverly Hills, Sage (1988)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stoner, G., Holland, J.: Using case studies in finance research. In Humphrey, C., Lee, B. (eds.) The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind-the-Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, Section One, pp. 37–56. Elsevier, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Avallone
    • 1
  • Paola Ramassa
    • 1
  • Elisa Roncagliolo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Business StudiesUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations