Generation of a Partitioned Dataset with Single, Interleave and Multioccupancy Daily Living Activities

  • Francisco J. Quesada
  • Francisco Moya
  • Javier Medina
  • Luis Martínez
  • Chris Nugent
  • Macarena Espinilla
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9454)


The advances in electronic devices have entailed the development of smart environments which have the aim to help and make easy the life of their inhabitants. In this kind of environments, an important task is the process of activity recognition of an inhabitant in the environment in order to anticipate the occupant necessities and to adapt such smart environment. Due to the cost to checking activity recognition approaches in real environments, usually, they use datasets generated from smart environments. Although there are many datasets for activity recognition in smart environments, it is difficult to find single, interleaved or multioccupancy activity datasets, or combinations of these classes of activities according to the researchers’ needs. In this work, the design and development of a complete dataset with 14 sensors and 9 different activities daily living is described, being this dataset divided into partitions with different classes of activities.


Dataset Activity recognition Smart environments Single activities Interleave activities Multioccupancy activities 



This contribution was supported by Research Projects TIN-2012-31263, CEATIC-2013-001, UJA2014/06/14 and by the Doctoral School of the University of Jaén. Invest Northern Ireland is acknowledge for partially supporting this project under the Competence Centre Program Grant RD0513853 - Connected Health Innovation Centre.


  1. 1.
    Chen, L., Hoey, J., Nugent, C.D., Cook, D.J., Yu, Z.: Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 42(6), 790–808 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, L., Nugent, C.: Ontology-based activity recognition in intelligent pervasive environments. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. 5(4), 410–430 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Wang, H.: A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24(6), 961–974 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook, D., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Crandall, A., Sanders, C., Thomas, B.: Collecting and disseminating smart home sensor data in the casas project. In: Proceedings of the CHI Workshop on Developing Shared Home Behavior Datasets to Advance HCI and Ubiquitous Computing Research, pp. 1–7 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook, D.J., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., et al.: Assessing the quality of activities in a smart environment. Methods Inf. Med. 48(5), 480–485 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu, T., Wang, L., Wu, Z., Tao, X., Lu, J.: A pattern mining approach to sensor-based human activity recognition. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23(9), 1359–1372 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jurek, A., Nugent, C., Bi, Y., Wu, S.: Clustering-based ensemble learning for activity recognition in smart homes. Sensors 14(7), 12285–12304 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lepri, B., Mana, N., Cappelletti, A., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M.: What is happening now? detection of activities of daily living from simple visual features. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 14(8), 749–766 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, C., Lin, M., Yang, L.T., Ding, C.: Integrating the enriched feature with machine learning algorithms for human movement and fall detection. J. Supercomput. 67(3), 854–865 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moshtaghi, M., Zukerman, I., Russell, R.: Statistical models for unobtrusively detecting abnormal periods of inactivity in older adults. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 25(3), 231–265 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roggen, D., Calatroni, A., Rossi, M., Holleczek, T., Forster, K., Troster, G., Lukowicz, P., Bannach, D., Pirkl, G., Ferscha, A., et al.: Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In: 2010 Seventh International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS), pp. 233–240. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singla, G., Cook, D.J., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.: Tracking activities in complex settings using smart environment technologies. Int. J. Biosci. Psychiatry Technol. (IJBSPT) 1(1), 25 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singla, G., Cook, D.J., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.: Recognizing independent and joint activities among multiple residents in smart environments. J. Ambient Intell. Humanized Comput. 1(1), 57–63 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Streitz, N., Nixon, P.: The disappearing computer. Commun. ACM 48(3), 32–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tapia, E.M., Intille, S.S., Larson, K.: Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 158–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Kasteren, T., Noulas, A., Englebienne, G., Kröse, B.: Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 1–9. ACM (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco J. Quesada
    • 1
  • Francisco Moya
    • 1
  • Javier Medina
    • 1
  • Luis Martínez
    • 1
  • Chris Nugent
    • 2
  • Macarena Espinilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of JaénJaénSpain
  2. 2.School of Computing and MathematicsUniversity of UlsterJordanstownUK

Personalised recommendations