Advertisement

Introduction: Understanding the Importance of the Disputes in the South China Sea

  • Enrico Fels
  • Truong-Minh Vu
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

When looking at Asia-Pacific, a regional power shift seems to be taking place. Probably the most notable feature of this is the rise of China as an economic powerhouse, a major military power as well as a proactive player in various multilateral institutions and fora. Multiple authors have rightly described China as one of the most important forces for change both at the regional and global level. China’s widely discussed rise and the changing regional power balance caused by the Middle Kingdom’s impressive development have indeed altered the global perceptions of the geo-politics and geo-economics of Asia-Pacific. On the one hand, this is due to the greater role China is now playing beyond its own region. More importantly, however, this is one the other hand also strongly related to the growing possibility that the US-led regional order in Asia-Pacific may be challenged (and permanently altered) by an increasingly confident Chinese leadership. This cannot only be exemplified by the installation of new intergovernmental bodies by China. At least equally important in this regard is the fact that China has actively been working towards shifting the established order in its nearby neighborhood. Developments in the South China Sea (SCS) are of primary importance in this regard. Accordingly, the disputes in the SCS need to be better understood in order to develop a more comprehensive grasp of the broader power play that takes place in Asia-Pacific.

Keywords

South China Sea Rising China United States Sino-US competition Conflict management 

References

  1. Allison, G. (2012, August, 21). Thucydides trap has been sprung in the Pacific. Financial Times. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5d695b5a-ead3-11e1-984b-00144feab49a.html#axzz3UOWmaOx2
  2. Babones, S. (2011). The middling kingdom. Foreign Affairs, 90(5), 79–88.Google Scholar
  3. Caceres, S. B. (2014). China’s strategic interests in the South China Sea. Power and resources (p. 89). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, T. J. (2011). Worse than a Monolith. Alliance politics and problems of coercive diplomacy in Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Churchill, R., & Lowe, V. (1999). The Law of the Sea (3rd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Copeland, D. C. (2012). Realism and Neorealism in the study of regional conflict. In T. V. Paul (Ed.), International relations theory and regional transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory. India and its contradictions. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  8. Fawn, R. (2009). Regions’ and their study: Wherefrom, what for and whereto? Review of International Studies, 35(S. 1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea. The struggle for power in Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hayton, B. (2015). The South China Sea. The struggle for power in Asia (p. 149). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Holslag, J. (2015). China’s coming war with Asia. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, J. H. (2010). China’s place in today’s world. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 35(2), 167–223.Google Scholar
  13. Kirchberger, S. (2015). Assessing China’s naval power: Technological innovation, technological constraints, and strategic implications. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kissinger, H. (2011). China. Zwischen Tradition und Herausforderung. München: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, N. (2005). Dispute settlement in the United Nation Convention on Law of the Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Layne, C. (2009). The waning of US hegemony—Myth or reality? A review essay. International Security, 34(1), 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mardell, M. (2012, November 18). US pivots, China bristles. BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20387131
  18. Marsh. (2014). 613 and Sloan, Elinor (2011): ‘US-China military and security developments’. International Journal, 66(2), 265–283.Google Scholar
  19. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the west’s fault. The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. Morrison, W. M. (2013). China’s economic rise: History, trends, challenges, and implications for the United States. CRS Report for Congress, No. RL33534, 17th December 2013. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33534.pdf (10.09.2015).
  21. Oertel, J. (2014). China and the United Nations. Chinese UN policy in the areas of peace and development in the era of Hu Jintao. Baden-Baden: Nomos, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  22. Office of the Secretary of Defence. (2014) Military and Security Developments Involving the People’ Republic of China. Annual Report to Congress. Retrieved September 17, 2014, from http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2014_DoD_China_Report.pdf
  23. Perlo-Freeman, S., & Solmirano, C. (2014, April). Trends in world military expenditure, 2013. SIPRI Fact Sheet, p. 4.Google Scholar
  24. Reuters. (2012, October 23). ‘Debating China’, U.S. President Barack Obama and Republican rival Mitt Romney outline China policy in final Presidential debate. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from http://www.reuters.com/video/2012/10/23/debating-china?videoId=238602596
  25. Roach, S. S. (2009). The next Asia. Opportunities and challenges for a new globalization. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Roach, S. (2014). Unbalance. The codependency of America and China. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Roy, D. (2013). Return of the dragon. Rising China and regional security. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sakhuja, V. (2011). Asian maritime power in the 21st century. Strategic transactions—China, India and Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Sally, R. (2010). The shift to the East. Economic Affairs, 30(3), 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Samuelson, R. J. (2014, May, 14). Economic power shifting in China’s favor. The Washington Post. Retrieved July 9 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-economic-power-shifting-in-chinas-favor/2014/05/14/bee0d608-daf3-11e3-b745-87d39690c5c0_story.html
  31. Smith, M. A. (2012). Power in the changing global order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stratfor. (2010). China: Power and perils. Austin: Stratfor Press.Google Scholar
  33. Szalwinski, A. (2014). Asia’s maritime disputes. In A. Tellis, A. M. Denmark, & G. Chaffin (Eds.), Strategic Asia 2014–15 US alliances and partnerships at the center of global power (pp. 348–350). Seattle: NBR.Google Scholar
  34. Thirlway, H. (2010). The sources of international law. In M. D. Evans (Ed.), International law (3rd ed., pp. 95–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagener, M. (2011). Die aufgeschobene Konfrontation: Warum die USA mit China (noch) kooperieren. Internationale Politik, (2), 112–119.Google Scholar
  36. Waldron, A. (2014). China’s ‘peaceful rise’ enters turbulence. Orbis, 58(2), 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. White, H. (2010, September). Power Shift. Australia’s future between Washington and Beijing. Quarterly Essay, 39, 2.Google Scholar
  38. Wolfrum, R. (2014). Freedom of navigation: New challenges. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/statements_of_president/wolfrum/freedom_navigation_080108_eng.pdf. Accessed 27 November 2015.
  39. Yong, D., & Moore, T. G. (2004). China views globalization: Toward a new great-power politics? The Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 117–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Global StudiesRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Saigon Center for International StudiesUniversity of Social Sciences and HumanitiesHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations