Photodegradation of Pollutants in Water over TiO2 Supported on Molecular Sieves

Chapter
Part of the Nanostructure Science and Technology book series (NST)

Abstract

Dispersion of TiO2 on supported materials has been reported to be an effective approach to increase the catalytic activity of TiO2 in photodegradation of pollutants. Among the different supports, silica molecular sieves have the advantages of ordered porous structure, high surface area and high chemical stability. In this chapter, the preparation methods of TiO2 supporting on different types of silica-based molecular sieves and the resulting structures are demonstrated. The catalytic performances of these catalysts for photodegradation of organic pollutants in water are also discussed. The photocatalytic activity of supported TiO2 can be significantly enhanced by the molecular sieves as the supporting materials including zeolites, macro and mesoporous SiO2, and clays. The enhancement of the activity is mainly attributed to more active sites of TiO2 on the larger surface areas of the catalysts and the higher adsorption capabilities to organic molecules of the supported TiO2 in most of the cases. On the other hand, optimization of TiO2 loading, which in turn affecting the size of TiO2 particles, was found to be crucial to maximize the photocatalytic activity of the catalyst.

Keywords

Methylene Blue Photocatalytic Activity Methylene Orange TiO2 Nanoparticles TiO2 Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Pan JH, Dou HQ, Xiong ZG, Xu C, Ma JZ, Zhao XS (2010) Porous photocatalysts for advanced water purifications. J Mater Chem 20:4512–4528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao DY, Jaroniec M, Hsiao BS (2010) Editorial for themed issue on “advanced materials in water treatments”. J Mater Chem 20:4476–4477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoffman A, Carraway ER, Hoffman M (1994) Photocatalytic production of H2O2 and organic peroxides on quantum sized semiconductor colloids. Environ Sci Technol 28:776–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pelaez M, Nicholas TN, Suresh C et al (2012) A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl Catal B Environ 125:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emilio CA, Litter MI, Kunst M, Bouchard M, Colbeau-Justin C (2006) Phenol photodegradation on platinized-TiO2 photocatalysts related to charge-carrier dynamics. Langmuir 22:3606–3613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95:69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang Y, Huang Y, Ho W, Zhang L, Zou Z, Lee S (2009) Biomolecule-controlled hydrothermal synthesis of C-N-S-tridoped TiO2 nanocrystalline photocatalysts for NO removal under simulated solar light irradiation. J Hazard Mater 169:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Su C, Tseng C-M, Chen L-F, You B-H, Hsu B-C, Chen S-S (2006) Sol-hydrothermal preparation and photocatalysis of titanium dioxide. Thin Solid Films 498:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao J, Wu T, Wu K, Oikawa K, Hidaka H, Serpone N (1998) Photoassisted degradation of dye pollutants. 3. Degradation of the cationic dye rhodamine B in aqueous anionic surfactant/TiO2 dispersions under visible light irradiation: evidence for the need of substrate adsorption on TiO2 particles. Environ Sci Technol 32:2394–2400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Asahi R, Taga Y, Mannstadt W, Freeman AJ (2000) Electronic and optical properties of anatase TiO2. Phys Rev B 61:7459–7465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amtout A, Leonelli R (1995) Optical properties of rutile near its fundamental band gap. Phys Rev B 51:6842–6851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koelsch M, Cassaignon S, Thanh Minh CT, Guillemoles J-F, Jolivet J-P (2004) Electrochemical comparative study of titania (anatase, brookite and rutile) nanoparticles synthesized in aqueous medium. Thin Solid Films 451:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Al-Ekabi H, Sperpone N, Pelizzetti E, Minero C (1989) Kinetic studies in heterogeneous photocatalysis. 2. Titania-mediated degradation of 4-chlorophenol alone and in a three-component mixture of 4-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and 2,4,5-trichlorophenol in air-equilibrated aqueous media. Langmuir 5:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turchi CS, Ollis DF (1989) Mixed reactant photocatalysis - intermediates and mutual rate inhibition. J Catal 119:483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tachikawa T, Fujitsuka M, Majima T (2007) Mechanistic insight into the TiO2 photocatalytic reactions: design of new photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C 111:5259–5275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi W, Termin A, Hoffmann MR (1994) The role of metal ion dopants in quantum-sized TiO2: correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics. J Phys Chem B 98:13669–13679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gomathi Devi L, Kavitha R (2013) A review on non metal ion doped titania for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under UV/solar light: role of photogenerated charge carrier dynamics in enhancing the activity. Appl Catal B Environ 140:559–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nishimoto SI, Ohtani B, Kajiwara H, Kagiya T (1985) Correlation of the crystal structure of titanium dioxide prepared from titanium tetra-2-propoxide with the photocatalytic activity for redox reactions in aqueous propan-2-ol and silver salt solutions. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 81:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tanaka K, Hisanaga T, Rivera AP (1993) Photocatalytic purification and treatment of water and air. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fox MA, Dulay MT (1993) Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95:341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tran TH, Nosaka AY, Nosaka Y (2006) Adsorption and photocatalytic decomposition of amino acids in TiO2 photocatalytic systems. J Phys Chem B 110:25525–25531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oosawa Y, Grätzel M (1988) Effect of surface hydroxyl density on photocatalytic oxygen generation in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1(84):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang J, Liu X, Li R et al (2012) TiO2 nanoparticles with increased surface hydroxyl groups and their improved photocatalytic activity. Catal Commun 19:96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoneyama H, Yamanaka S, Haga S (1989) Photocatalytic activities of microcrystalline TiO2 incorporated in sheet silicates of clay. J Phys Chem 83:4833–4837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Z, Wang CC, Zakaria R, Ying J (1998) Role of particle size in nanocrystallined TiO2-based. Photocatalysis. J Phys Chem B 102:10871–10878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ooka C, Yoshida H, Horio M, Suzuki K, Hattori T (2003) Adsorptive and photocatalytic performance of TiO2 pillared montmorillonite in degradation of endocrine disruptors having different hydrophobicity. Appl Catal B Environ 41:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu C, Tzeng L, Kuo Y, Shu CH (2002) Enhancement of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 film via surface modification of the substrate. Appl Catal A Gen 226:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sakthivel S, Shankar MV, Palanichamy M, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V (2002) Photocatalytic degradation of leather dye: comparative study of TiO2 supported on alumina and glass beads. J Photochem Photobiol A 148:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nam H-J, Amemiya T, Murabayashi M, Itoh K (2004) Photocatalytic activity of sol–gel TiO2 thin films on various kinds of glass substrates: the effects of Na+ and primary particle size. J Phys Chem B 108:8254–8259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen Y, Dionysiou DD (2005) Effect of calcination temperature on the photocatalytic activity and adhesion of TiO2 films prepared by the P-25 powder-modified sol-gel method. J Mol Catal A 244:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Takeda N, Torimoto T, Sampath S, Kuwabata S, Yoneyama H (1995) Effect of inert supports for titanium dioxide loading on enhancement of photodecomposition rate of gaseous propionaldehyde. J Phys Chem 99:9986–9991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sato S (1988) Effects of surface modification with silicon oxides on the photochemical properties of powdered titania. Langmuir 4:1156–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anderson C, Bard AJ (1995) An improved photocatalyst of TiO2/SiO2 prepared by a sol-gel synthesis. J Phys Chem 99:9822–9825Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoneyama H, Torimoto T (2000) Titanium dioxide/adsorbent hybrid photocatalysts for photodestruction of organic substances of dilute concentrations. Catal Today 58:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shi J, Zheng J, Wu P, Ji X (2008) Immobilization of TiO2 films on activated carbon fiber and their photocatalytic degradation properties for dye compounds with different molecular size. Catal Commun 9:1846–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Takeda N, Iwata N, Torimoto T, Yoneyama H (1998) Influence of carbon black as an absorbent used in TiO2 photocatalyst films on photodegradation behaviors of propyzamide. J Catal 177:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Matos J, Laine J, Herrmann JM (1998) Synergy effect in the photocatalytic degradation of phenol on a suspended mixture of titania and activated carbon. Appl Catal B Environ 18:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ao CH, Lee SC (2004) Combination effect of activated carbon with TiO2 for the photodegradation of binary pollutants at typical indoor air level. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 161:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yu Y, Yu JC, Chan C-Y et al (2005) Enhancement of adsorption and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by using carbon nanotubes for the treatment of azo dye. Appl Catal B Environ 61:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu B, Zeng HC (2008) Carbon nanotubes supported mesoporous mesocrystals of anatase TiO2. Chem Mater 20:2711–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li F, Jiang Y, Xia M et al (2009) A high-stability silica–clay composite: synthesis, characterization and combination with TiO2 as a novel photocatalyst for azo dye. J Hazard Mater 165:1219–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zanjanchi MA, Golmojdeh H, Arvand M (2009) Enhanced adsorptive and photocatalytic achievements in removal of methylene blue by incorporating tungstophosphoric acid–TiO2 into MCM-41. J Hazard Mater 169:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wittmann G, Demeestere K, Dombi A, Dewulf J, Langenhove HV (2005) Preparation, structural characterization and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous Ti-silicates. Appl Catal B Environ 61:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li G, Zhao XS (2006) Characterization and photocatalytic properties of titanium-containing mesoporous SBA-15. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:3569–3573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guo P, Wang P, Guo H (2009) TiO2/Na-HZSM-5 nano-composite photocatalyst: reversible adsorption by acid sites promotes photocatalytic decomposition of methyl orange. Appl Catal B Environ 90:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kuwahara Y, Aoyama J, Miyakubo K et al (2012) TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of organic compounds in water and air supported on highly hydrophobic FAU zeolite: structural, sorptive, and photocatalytic studies. J Catal 285:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kamegawa T, Ishiguro Y, Seto H, Yamashita H (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic properties of TiO2-loaded porous silica with hierarchical macroporous and mesoporous architectures in water purification. J Mater Chem A 3:2323–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mazinani B, Beitollahi A, Masrom AK et al (2012) Characterization and evaluation of the photocatalytic properties of wormhole-like mesoporous silica incorporating TiO2, prepared using different hydrothermal and calcination temperatures. Res Chem Intermed 38:1733–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jang JS, Choi SH, Kim HG, Lee JS (2008) Location and state of Pt in platinized CdS/TiO2. J Phys Chem C 112:17200–17205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hsien Y-H, Chang C-F, Chen Y-H, Cheng S (2001) Photodegradation of aromatic pollutants in water over TiO2 supported on molecular sieves. Appl Catal B Environ 31:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tanev PT, Chibwe M, Pinnavala TJ (1994) Titanium-containing mesoporous molecular sieves for catalytic oxidation of aromatic compounds. Nature 368:321–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Koyano KA, Tatsumi T (1997) Synthesis of titanium-containing MCM-41. Micro Mater 10:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Grieken RV, Mariscal R (2000) Surface modified amorphous titanosilicate catalysts for liquid phase epoxidation. Catal Today 61:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen Y, Han X, Bao X (2004) Direct synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of titanium-substituted SBA-15 mesoporous molecular sieves. Appl Catal A Gen 273:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kang M, Park MS (2004) Synthesis of high concentration titanium-incorporated nanoporous silicates (Ti-NPS) and their photocatalytic performance for toluene oxidation. Appl Catal B Environ 53:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Li F, Jiang Y, Yu L et al (2005) Surface effect of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Appl Surf Sci 252:1410–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shankar MV, Anandan S, Venkatachalam N, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V (2006) Fine route for an efficient removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) by zeolite-supported TiO2. Chemosphere 63:1014–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lee YC, Cheng S (2006) One-pot synthesis and photocatalysis of encapsulated TiO2 in mesoporous SiO2. J Chin Chem Soc 53:1355–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Colborn T, Vom Saal FS, Soto AM (1993) Developmental effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Env Imp Ass Rev 14:469–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pichat J, D’Oliveria JC, Maffre JF, Mas D (1993) Destruction of 2,4-D in water by TiO2–UV, H2O2–UV, or direct photolysis. In: Ollis DF, Al-Ekabi H (eds) Photocatalytic purification and treatment of water and air. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 683–687Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Keith LH (1998) Environmental endocrine disruptors. Pure Appl Chem 70:2319–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sun L, Lee HK (2003) Stability studies of propoxur herbicide in environmental water samples by liquid chromatography–atmospheric pressure chemical ionization ion-trap mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1014:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Stanley CW, Thorton JS (1972) Gas-chromatographic method for residues of Baygon and its major metabolite in animal tissues and milk. J Agric Food Chem 20:1269–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    de la Guardia M, Khalaf KD, Carbonell V, Rubio AM (1995) Clean analytical method for the determination of propoxur. Anal Chim Acta 308:462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Noorjahan M, Durga Kumari V, Subrahmanyam M, Boule P (2004) A novel and efficient photocatalyst: TiO2-HZSM-5 combinate thin film. Appl Catal B Environ 47:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Corma A (1997) From microporous to mesoporous molecular sieve materials and their use in catalysis. Chem Rev 97:2373–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Beck JS (1992) Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 359:710–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Beck JS, Higgins JB, Schlenker JL (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114:10834–110843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schlenker D, Stucky GD (1998) Nonionic Triblock and Star Diblock Copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J Am Chem Soc 120:6024–6036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Auerbach SM, Carrado KA, Dutta PT (2005) Handbook of zeolite science and technology. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Tayade RJ, Kulkarni RG, Jasra RV (2007) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2-coated NaY and HY zeolites for the degradation of methylene blue in water. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sankararaman S, Yoon KB, Yabe T, Kochi JK (1991) Control of back electron transfer from charge-transfer ion pairs by zeolite supercages. J Am Chem Soc 113:1419–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mahalakshmi M, Vishnu Priya S, Banumathi A, Palanichamy M, Murugesan V (2009) Photocatalytic degradation of aqueous propoxur solution using TiO2 and Hβ zeolite-supported TiO2. J Hazard Mater 161:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Anpo M, Shima T, Kodama S (1987) Photocatalytic hydrogenation of propyne with water on small-particle titania: size quantization effects and reaction intermediates. J Phys Chem 91:4305–4310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hagfeldt A, Gratzel M (1995) Light-Induced redox reactions in nanocrystalline systems. Chem Rev 95:49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yeber MC, Rodriguez J, Freer J (2000) Photocatalytic degradation of cellulose bleaching effluent by supported TiO2 and ZnO. Chemosphere 41:1193–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lei Q, Hinestroza JP (2004) Application of nanotechnology for high performance textiles. J Text Apparel Technol Manag 4:1–7Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Furube A, Asahi T, Masuhara H, Yamashita H, Anpo M (1999) Charge carrier dynamics of standard TiO2 catalysts revealed by femtosecond diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 103:3120–3127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kominami H, Murakami S, Kato J, Kera Y, Ohtani B (2002) Correlation between some physical properties of titanium dioxide particles and their photocatalytic activity for some probe reactions in aqueous systems. J Phys Chem B 106:10501CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations